Exin CITM Dumps

Requests for password resets from unknown individuals suggestsocial engineeringattacks, such as phishing or impersonation, where attackers manipulate users to gain unauthorized access. An information security awareness program should focus on educating staff about social engineering tactics to recognize and prevent such incidents.

E-mail usage (A), instant messaging (B), and internet usage (C) may be vectors for attacks, but the core issue is social engineering, which encompasses tactics used across these channels.

For a recurring incident,problem managementinITILaims to identify the root cause to prevent future occurrences. The5-Whystechnique (C) is recommended as it involves repeatedly asking “why” to drill down to the root cause of the issue. This simple, effective method is suitable for a group of technical specialists analyzing a recurring problem, such as an incident occurring every Monday, which may stem from a specific process, configuration, or system issue.

Kepner-Tregoe (A):A structured decision-making and problem-solving method, more complex and less focused on root cause analysis alone.

Technical observation post (B):Not a standard problem management technique; likely a distractor.

Fault isolation (D):Focuses on isolating faulty components, more applicable to hardware issues than recurring process-related incidents.

The 5-Whys technique is widely used in ITIL problem management for its simplicity and effectiveness in collaborative root cause analysis.

To reduce the risk of fraud in large financial transactions, the security principle ofintegrity(C) requires the highest attention.Integrity, as perISO/IEC 27001’s CIA triad (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability), ensures that data is accurate, complete, and unaltered. Fraud often involves manipulating transaction data, so controls like data validation, checksums, or audit trails are critical to maintain integrity and prevent unauthorized changes.

Confidentiality (A):Protects data from unauthorized access, less directly related to fraud prevention.

Availability (B):Ensures system access, not the primary concern for fraud.

Reliability (D):Not a standard CIA triad principle; may relate to system performance but not fraud.

For a government system handling land title transfers, the key requirements arespeed of transmissionandprivacy. Aprivate blockchainis most suitable because it restricts access to authorized participants, ensuring privacy and confidentiality of sensitive data such as land ownership records. Private blockchains are controlled by a single organization or a limited group, allowing faster transaction processing compared to public blockchains, which require consensus from a large, decentralized network. This aligns with the need for quick and secure transactions in a controlled environment.

Public blockchains (B) are open to anyone, which compromises privacy for sensitive government data. Community blockchain (A) is not a standard term in blockchain technology, and consortium blockchains (D), while involving multiple organizations, are less suitable for a single government entity needing full control.

InITIL’s service catalog management, data points required for IT services are used tomeasure the performance of IT services delivered(A). These data points (e.g., uptime, response times, incident resolution rates) enable the IT provider to monitor and report on service quality, ensuring alignment with service level agreements (SLAs) and customer expectations. A needs analysis identifies key performance indicators (KPIs) to track service effectiveness.

Identify data used by the customer (B):Focuses on customer data usage, not service performance.

Determine life expectancy (C):Relates to service lifecycle planning, not data points.

Establish operating hours (D):Operating hours are a service attribute, not the primary purpose of data points.

Alessons learned reportin project management is designed to document both positive and negative experiences from a project to improve future projects. According to theProject Management Institute (PMI)and frameworks like PMBOK, the purpose is to capture insights, successes, challenges, and recommendations to enhance processes, avoid repeating mistakes, and replicate successes in future initiatives.

Option A focuses only on reporting achievements, which is too narrow. Option B emphasizes accountability for mistakes, which is not the primary goal, as the report aims to improve rather thanblame. Option C is incorrect because identifying risks is part of risk management, not the primary focus of lessons learned. Option D correctly captures the intent to benefit future projects by analyzing both positive and negative aspects.

A high failure rate of changes duringPost Implementation Review (PIR)inITIL’s change management process suggests a deficiency in theassessment and evaluation of change requests(A). Proper assessment involves analyzing risks, impacts, and feasibility before approving changes. If this step is inadequate (e.g., overlooking conflicts or underestimating impacts), changes are more likely to fail, as they may not align with objectives or be poorly planned.

Insufficient resources (B):May cause delays but is less directly tied to failed objectives compared to poor assessment.

CAB meetings not taking place (C):The CAB reviews changes, but the scenario doesn’t indicate meetings are absent; poor assessment can occur even with CAB involvement.

Insufficient budget (D):May limit implementation but is less likely the primary cause of failed objectives.

To deliverknowledgesupportingcross-functional business units, bothinformation management(A) anddata management(B) are required (C).Data managementensures raw data is collected, stored, and organized (e.g., databases, data quality), whileinformation managementtransforms data into meaningful knowledge (e.g., through analytics, reporting, or knowledge bases) accessible to business units. According toCOBITorIT strategy frameworks, integrating data and information management enables cross-functional collaboration by providing actionable insights and knowledge sharing.

Information management alone (A):Focuses on knowledge delivery but relies on well-managed data.

Data management alone (B):Provides raw data but lacks the processes to turn it into usable knowledge.

Ause caseoruser storydescribes interactions between a user (role) and the system to achieve a specific goal, defining what the system must do. This corresponds to afunctional requirement(A), which specifies the system’s features or capabilities (e.g., “the system shall allow users to submit a return request”). According toSDLCand requirements engineering, functional requirements focus on specific functionalities, as captured in use cases.

Behavioral requirement (B):Not a standard term; it may refer to system behavior but is less specific than functional requirements.

Non-functional requirement (C):Covers performance, scalability, or usability (e.g., response time), not specific user interactions.

Security requirement (D):A subset of non-functional requirements focused on security, not general use case interactions.

Security awareness programs require ongoing engagement to remain effective. If security incidents decrease initially but increase after eight months, the most likely cause is thatmessage materials are few and static, and renewal is not taking place(C). Static content becomes outdated or ignored over time, reducing its impact. Regular updates, new campaigns, and varied delivery methods (e.g., videos, quizzes) are essential to maintain employee awareness and adapt to evolving threats, as perISO/IEC 27001orNISTsecurity awareness guidelines.

Insufficient budget (A):While budget constraints could limit program scope, there’s no evidence in the scenario to suggest this is the primary issue.

Scope too narrow (B):A narrow scope might limit effectiveness initially, but the initial success suggests the scope was adequate; the issue is sustaining engagement.

Lack of resources for instructor-led sessions (D):Instructor-led sessions are one delivery method, but the core issue is likely outdated content rather than delivery format.

InITIL(Information Technology Infrastructure Library), anemergency changeis implemented to address urgent issues that significantly impact business operations, such as a processing error during financial year closing. Emergency changes are fast-tracked to restore service or prevent further disruption, bypassing some standard change management processes while still requiring approval.

Normal changes (A) follow the full change management process, standard changes (B) are pre-approved and routine, and exceptional (C) is not a standard ITIL term. Emergency change (D) fits the scenario of urgent action to avoid business delays.

Awhite box testinvolves testing the internal structure and code of an application, requiring access to its source code. The stakeholders’ demand for anindependent white box testindicates their primary concern is thequality of the source code(C). This type of testing, conducted by an independent party, ensures the code is well-structured, secure, and free of defects that could lead to vulnerabilities or inefficiencies.

Capacity (A):Refers to the system’s ability to handle load, typically tested via performance or stress testing, not white box testing.

Performance (B):Focuses on speed and responsiveness, evaluated through performance testing, not white box testing.

Functionality (D):Is tested via black box testing, which focuses on inputs and outputs without examining the code.

White box testing is a technical process often aligned withSDLCquality assurance practices, ensuring code reliability and maintainability, which is critical for stakeholders concerned about long-term system integrity.

Inrisk management, after controls are implemented to mitigate risks, the remaining risk that the organization is willing to accept is calledresidual risk(C). According to frameworks likeISO/IEC 27001andCOBIT, residual risk represents the level of risk that persists after applying controls, deemed acceptable based on the organization’s risk appetite. For example, if a control reduces the likelihood or impact of a threat (e.g., data breach), the remaining exposure is the residual risk, which the organization monitors but does not further mitigate unless necessary.

Reduced risk (A):Not a standard term; implies a general decrease but lacks specificity.

Lowered risk (B):Similar to reduced risk, not a recognized term in risk management frameworks.

Modified risk (D):Implies risk alteration but is not a standard term for post-control risk levels.

Residual risk is a critical concept in risk management, ensuring organizations understand and accept the remaining exposure after mitigation efforts.

ACritical Success Factor (CSF)inIT services review, as perITIL’s service management framework, is toevaluate deliverables before meeting the customer for an IT service review(A). This ensures that the IT service provider has thoroughly assessed service performance, identified issues, and prepared actionable insights or recommendations to discuss with the customer. Pre-evaluating deliverables enables a productive review meeting, ensuring alignment with customer expectations and service level agreements (SLAs).

Suitable location (B):Logistical factors like location are not critical to the success of the review process.

Explain shortcomings and bottlenecks (C):While transparency is important, focusing only on issues without prior evaluation may undermine the review’s effectiveness.

Inform customers on improvements (D):Informing about improvements is part of the review but not the CSF; evaluation of deliverables is the foundation for meaningful discussions.

Ahigh-level assessmentto list risks in order of priority for treatment is best conducted usingqualitative analysis(D). According toISO 31000, qualitative risk analysis assesses risks based on their likelihood and impact using non-numerical methods (e.g., risk matrices, high/medium/low ratings). This approach is suitable for high-level assessments, as it quickly prioritizes risks without requiring detailed quantitative data, aligning with senior management’s needs for a prioritized risk list.

Quantitative analysis (A):Uses numerical data (e.g., cost estimates, probabilities) for detailed analysis, not ideal for high-level overviews.

Semi-quantitative analysis (B):Combines qualitative and quantitative methods, but is more detailed than needed for a high-level assessment.

Ad hoc analysis (C):Not a standard risk analysis method; implies informal analysis, unsuitable for structured prioritization.