HP HPE7-A02 Dumps

On Aruba Mobility Controllers, dataplane captures can include wireless frames encapsulated inside GRE (for example, ERM / remote mirroring or tunneled 802.11 data). If Wireshark does not have GRE dissection enabled, these packets may appear as generic IP/UDP payloads, and the inner traffic (client frames) will not decode correctly.

MC dataplane is exactly where GRE-encapsulated user traffic is likely to appear. Enabling GRE in Wireshark allows you to see and decode the inner payload (802.11/Ethernet/IP).

MC control plane traffic is generally not GRE encapsulated data traffic.

For gateways, captures exported as ERM over UDP often require different decoding (e.g., ARUBA_ERM, not generic GRE).

Thus, the most appropriate case to ensure GRE is enabled is when the capture came from the MC dataplane → Option D.

A typical use case for using HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Onboard is to provision unmanaged devices to succeed at certificate-based 802.1X authentication. ClearPass Onboard allows users to securely configure their personal devices with the necessary certificates and network settings to authenticate on the network using 802.1X, which enhances security and simplifies the onboarding process for unmanaged devices.

1.Certificate-Based Authentication: ClearPass Onboard simplifies the process of issuing and installing certificates on unmanaged devices, ensuring they can authenticate securely using 802.1X.

2.User-Friendly Onboarding: The Onboard process is user-friendly, guiding users through the steps needed to configure their devices for network access.

3.Enhanced Security: By using certificates for authentication, the solution provides a higher level of security compared to traditional username/password methods.

Custom Device Fingerprinting on CPPM:

To create a custom fingerprint, you first need to connect a known device of that type to the network.

CPPM will discover the device in its Endpoints Repository, allowing you to analyze its attributes (e.g., MAC OUI, DHCP options) and create custom profiling rules.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Correct. Discovering a known device in the Endpoints Repository is a prerequisite for creating accurate custom fingerprint rules.

Option B: Incorrect. CPDI integration is not required for custom fingerprints on CPPM.

Option C: Incorrect. XML rules are not pre-defined; they are created dynamically based on observed attributes.

Option D: Incorrect. The "Automatically download Endpoint Profiler Fingerprints" setting is unrelated to custom profiling.

To configure the HPE Aruba Networking VIA solution for remote employees who need to download their VIA connection profile from the VPN Concentrator (VPNC) and ensure that only those who authenticate with their domain credentials through ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) can do so, you need to set up a VIA Authentication Profile. This profile should use the CPPM's RADIUS server group. Once the VIA Authentication Profile is created, you need to reference this profile in the VIA Web Authentication Profile. This configuration ensures that the authentication process requires employees to validate their credentials via CPPM before they can download the VIA connection profile.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation

A non-default device posture is applied in scenarios where specific checks on a device's compliance or security state (posture) are required to grant or deny access. The correct answer is:

B. Checking whether a client has antivirus software as a condition for receiving access to resources.

This use case explicitly requires device posture assessment, which involves evaluating the device for attributes like antivirus software, patch levels, or other compliance criteria.

Non-default device posture rules are configured to assess these conditions and enforce the appropriate policy based on the device's state.

Other Options:

A. Applying threat inspection: Threat inspection rules operate independently of device posture and apply based on traffic content, not device compliance.

C. Redirecting compromised clients: This action is typically triggered based on a security event or threat detection, not directly related to device posture evaluation.

D. Integrating with ClearPass OnGuard: While OnGuard can contribute to posture assessment, it does not require a non-default device posture in the SSE rule directly.

References

HPE Aruba SSE Posture-Based Access Control documentation.

Aruba ClearPass and SSE Integration Deployment Guide.

To enforce 802.1X authentication for Windows domain computers to HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) and have the computers authenticate as both machines and users in the same session, you should set up TEAP (Tunneled EAP) as the authentication method. TEAP supports both machine and user authentication within a single 802.1X session, making it suitable for scenarios where both types of authentication are required simultaneously.

Why MD5 Authentication on Lag 1 is Preferred:

Lag 1 is the primary link between Switch-2 and Switch-1, both of which are Layer 3 switches running OSPF.

By enabling MD5 authentication, OSPF routers exchange authenticated packets, preventing unauthorized or rogue OSPF routers from forming adjacencies or injecting routes.

MD5 is a secure authentication method and ensures the integrity and authenticity of OSPF communications.

Other Options Analysis:

A. Configure OSPF authentication on VLANs 10-19 in password mode: While configuring authentication on VLAN interfaces could secure VLAN-specific OSPF traffic, it is less effective because the main threat of rogue OSPF comes from unauthorized L3 devices connected via the backbone (Lag 1).

C. Disable OSPF entirely on VLANs 10-19: Disabling OSPF on these VLANs is not a preferred solution because OSPF is needed to route traffic in this design.

D. Configure passive-interface as the OSPF default and disable OSPF passive on Lag 1: While passive interfaces prevent OSPF from forming adjacencies, it does not directly prevent rogue routers. Passive mode only limits OSPF advertisements on specific interfaces.

To ensure that HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) applies tag-based rules to a client immediately after learning the client has that tag, verify that both 802.1X services have the "Profile Endpoints" option enabled and an appropriate Change of Authorization (CoA) profile selected in the Profiler tab. This setup ensures that when a device is profiled and tagged, CPPM can immediately enforce the updated policies through CoA.

1.Profile Endpoints: Enabling this option ensures that endpoint profiling is active, allowing CPPM to gather and use device information dynamically.

2.CoA Profile: Selecting an appropriate CoA profile ensures that CPPM can push policy changes immediately to the network devices, applying the new rules without delay.

3.Real-Time Enforcement: This configuration allows for the immediate application of new tags and associated policies, ensuring compliance with security requirements.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation

The configuration includes the command aaa authentication allow-fail-through, which specifies that if the TACACS+ server fails to respond (e.g., times out), the switch will proceed to the next authentication method in the sequence, which is local. In this scenario:

The switch first attempts to authenticate the user against the TACACS+ server.

When the TACACS+ server fails to respond, the switch falls back to local authentication.

The user netadmin is a local account configured on the switch and belongs to the operators group.

As a result, the user is successfully authenticated locally and is granted operator level access.

References

Aruba AOS-CX User Guide: Authentication fallback mechanisms.

TACACS+ fallback behavior for HPE Aruba switches.

Aruba firewall / role access rules are evaluated top-down, first-match wins; once a rule matches, no later rules are processed.

Let’s walk the packet through the ordered rules:

The traffic is SSH, not UDP/67 ⇒ rule 1 does not match.

Destination 10.1.7.12 is not in 10.1.4.0/23 ⇒ rule 2 does not match.

10.1.7.12 is in 10.1.0.0/18 ⇒ rule 3 matches first.

Rule 3 action: Deny any to 10.1.0.0/18 + log.

Because rule 3 already matched, the later “Deny SSH to 10.1.0.0/21 + denylist” rule is never evaluated, so no denylist is applied.

Aruba documentation for session ACLs and firewall rules explicitly states that rules are evaluated from top to bottom and “the first match terminates further evaluation,” and logging/denylist flags on a rule are applied only when that specific rule matches.

So the outcome is: the SSH traffic is dropped and logged, but the client is not denylisted → Option B.

Syslog Integration with CPPM:

ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) can integrate with third-party firewalls via Syslog messages to detect and respond to internal threats.

The Syslog integration enables CPPM to gather context on suspicious activity and enforce appropriate policies such as isolating attackers by working with network devices like Aruba switches and APs.

Option A: Correct. This method allows for dynamic response to threats and leverages existing infrastructure without requiring major reconfiguration.

Option B: Incorrect. CPDI is primarily used for profiling devices, not directly for threat response based on Syslog information.

Option C: Incorrect. While it is possible for CPPM to poll information, this approach is less dynamic and not focused on immediate threat response.

Option D: Incorrect. Tunnel mode SSIDs and UBT are designed for forwarding user traffic securely but do not directly enhance threat detection or mitigation.

ClearPass OnGuard uses a Posture Policy object to define:

Which checks are performed (e.g., AV installed, firewall status, patches)

How the results map to posture tokens such as “Healthy,” “Quarantined,” etc.

The official OnGuard configuration workflow states that you must first “Define the posture policy”, and that these posture policies contain the rules for evaluating health and determining posture tokens.

Service enforcement policies then consume the posture token (e.g., Tips:Posture = Healthy) but do not define the posture conditions themselves. The “Posture” tab on a service is used to enable posture and associate it with the posture policy; the detailed rules live in the posture policy object.

Therefore, posture logic is defined by creating rules within a posture policy → Option A.

ClearPass Device Insight Integration:

To integrate ClearPass Device Insight (CPDI) with ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM), you must enable the Insight feature in the CPPM server configuration settings.

This ensures CPPM can share and receive profiling data with CPDI for device identification.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Incorrect. Root CA certificates are not required for this integration.

Option B: Correct. Enabling Insight on CPPM is essential for the integration to function.

Option C: Incorrect. WMI, SSH, and SNMP are not part of the CPDI integration prerequisites.

Option D: Incorrect. The Data Collector token is relevant to Aruba Central, not CPDI integration.

When configuring 802.1X authentication on edge ports of an AOS-CX switch and assigning VoIP phones to a "voice" role, the correct approach is to configure VLAN 12 as the allowed trunk VLAN in the "voice" role. This setup ensures that traffic tagged for VLAN 12 is appropriately managed by the role applied to the VoIP phones. In AOS-CX switches, the role-based VLAN configuration allows for more granular control and ensures that the VoIP phones' traffic is handled correctly without altering the edge port settings, which typically operate with default settings for authentication.

To block all clients connected through HPE Aruba Networking Central-managed APs from accessing YouTube, you should enable DPI (Deep Packet Inspection) and then create application rules to deny YouTube on the firewall roles. DPI allows the network to inspect and classify traffic based on application signatures, making it possible to enforce application-specific policies. By creating rules that specifically block YouTube traffic, you can effectively prevent clients from accessing the service.

RADIUS Accounting:

RADIUS accounting enables network devices to report client session details (e.g., IP addresses, session duration, bandwidth usage) to CPPM.

Interim updates ensure CPPM receives ongoing updates about the client’s session, enabling accurate tracking.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Incorrect. Syslog logging sends general system logs, not client session details.

Option B: Incorrect. Dynamic authorization (CoA) handles session changes but does not provide usage tracking.

Option C: Correct. RADIUS accounting with interim updates tracks client IP addresses and bandwidth utilization.

Option D: Incorrect. IF-MAP interfaces are used for metadata sharing, not for RADIUS-based tracking.

When using "Tips

" conditions within an 802.1X service's enforcement policy, you should enable caching roles and posture attributes from previous sessions in the service's enforcement settings. This ensures that ClearPass retains posture information from previous authentications, which is necessary for making decisions based on the current posture state of an endpoint. By caching these attributes, ClearPass can apply appropriate enforcement actions based on the device's posture status.

When you have created a rule in a ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) service's enforcement policy to quarantine devices with endpoint conflicts, it is important to consider whether the company has devices that use PXE boot. PXE booting devices can create conflicts in the profiler because they may temporarily have different network attributes (e.g., MAC address or IP address) before fully booting and obtaining their final configuration. Understanding whether PXE boot is in use can help determine if profiler parameters need to be adjusted to ignore such temporary conflicts, ensuring that devices are not incorrectly quarantined.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation

To prohibit users from uploading and downloading files from Dropbox using HPE Aruba Networking SSE (Secure Service Edge), you need to configure web access policies. This typically involves:

Adding a web category to the SSE configuration that includes Dropbox.

The SSE solution uses category-based filtering to block access to specific applications or services, such as Dropbox, based on their classification.

Other Options:

B. Installing the SSE root certificate is required for enabling SSL inspection, but this does not directly control access to Dropbox.

C and D. Deploying a connector is not necessary for this purpose as the enforcement is done via SSE policies, not by directly interfacing with Dropbox or remote users.

References

Aruba Networking SSE documentation on web filtering policies.

HPE Aruba SSE Application Control Best Practices Guide.

To show the security team information about MAC spoofing attempts detected by HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM), you should use ClearPass Insight to run an Active Endpoint Security report. ClearPass Insight provides comprehensive reporting capabilities that include detailed information on security incidents, such as MAC spoofing attempts. By generating this report, you can provide the security team with a clear overview of the detected spoofing activities, including the endpoints involved and the context of the events.

Centralized Role Configuration on CPPM:

CPPM can assign roles to clients dynamically during authentication.

However, the actual ACL policies (e.g., firewall policies) must already exist and be referenced locally on the switch.

CPPM cannot directly configure ACL details on AOS-CX switches.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Correct. The role is defined on CPPM, but it references a policy pre-configured on the switch.

Option B: Incorrect. This does not align with Aruba's centralized role-based access control design.

Option C: Incorrect. CPPM cannot configure the ACL policies and classes directly; they must exist locally.

Option D: Incorrect. Policies can be referenced centrally but not fully configured on CPPM.

To tunnel VoIP phone traffic from AOS-CX switches to an HPE Aruba Networking gateway, you need to configure a User-Based Tunneling (UBT) reserved VLAN on the switches. This VLAN is dedicated for tunneling purposes and ensures that the VoIP traffic is correctly identified and tunneled to the gateway where security policies can be applied.

1.UBT Configuration: Setting a UBT reserved VLAN ensures that the switch knows which VLAN to use for tunneling traffic to the gateway.

2.Traffic Tunneling: The reserved VLAN helps in segregating the VoIP traffic, ensuring it is handled securely and according to the configured policies at the gateway.

3.Policy Application: By tunneling the traffic, the gateway can apply advanced security policies to the VoIP traffic.

To follow best security practices for 802.1X authentication settings in Windows domain clients:

Specify at least two server names under "Connect to these servers":

Admins should explicitly list trusted RADIUS server names (e.g., radius.example.com) to prevent the client from connecting to unauthorized or rogue servers.

This mitigates man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks where an attacker attempts to present their own RADIUS server.

Select the desired Trusted Root Certificate Authority and "Don't prompt users":

Select the Trusted Root CA that issued the RADIUS server's certificate. This ensures clients validate the correct server certificate during the EAP-TLS/PEAP authentication process.

Enabling "Don't prompt users" ensures end users are not confused or tricked into accepting certificates from untrusted servers.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option C: Incorrect. Wildcards in server names (e.g., *.example.com) weaken security and allow broader matching, increasing the risk of rogue servers.

Option D: Incorrect. Clearing "Use simple certificate selection" requires users to select certificates manually, which can lead to errors and usability issues. Simple certificate selection is recommended when properly configured.

Recommended Settings for Best Security Practices:

Server Validation: Specify the exact RADIUS server names in the "Connect to these servers" field.

Root CA Validation: Ensure only the correct Trusted Root Certificate Authority is selected.

User Prompts: Enable "Don't prompt users" to enforce automatic and secure authentication without user intervention.

An HPE Aruba Networking AP's Device (TPM) certificate is signed by an HPE Aruba Networking Certificate Authority (CA) and is trusted by many HPE Aruba Networking solutions. This certificate is used for secure communications and device authentication within the Aruba network ecosystem.

1.CA-Signed Certificate: The Device (TPM) certificate is signed by a trusted Aruba CA, ensuring its authenticity and integrity.

2.Trust Across Solutions: Because it is signed by an Aruba CA, it is recognized and trusted by various Aruba solutions, facilitating secure interactions and communications.

3.Security: Using a CA-signed certificate enhances the security of the network by preventing unauthorized access and ensuring that communications are secure.

To support 802.1X authentication and download user roles from HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) on AOS-CX switches, you must install the root CA certificate for CPPM's RADIUS certificate in a Trust Anchor (TA) profile on the switches. This ensures that the switches trust the RADIUS server certificate presented by CPPM during the authentication process.

1.Root CA Certificate: Installing the root CA certificate ensures that the switch can verify the authenticity of the RADIUS server certificate provided by CPPM.

2.Trust Anchor Profile: The TA profile on the switch holds the root CA certificate, establishing a trust relationship between the switch and the CPPM RADIUS server.

3.Secure Authentication: This setup is essential for securing the 802.1X authentication process and enabling the download of user roles.

To control which commands managers are allowed to execute on AOS-CX switches using ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) as a TACACS+ server, you must configure the Shell service in the TACACS+ enforcement profile. The Shell service provides the ability to define granular access controls for commands. It supports policy-driven command authorization, which is essential in controlling administrative tasks based on roles.

References

Official HPE Aruba ClearPass documentation on TACACS+ integration and command authorization.

Industry best practices for AAA (Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting) configuration in network security architectures.

Contextual Exchange for Better Decisions:

HPE Aruba ClearPass can integrate with third-party solutions like MDM and firewalls to exchange contextual information about endpoints (e.g., device type, posture, location).

This integration allows ClearPass and the third-party solutions to make better access control and security decisions.

For example:

An MDM can inform CPPM about device compliance, and CPPM can adjust enforcement policies dynamically.

Firewalls can receive updated context about users and devices to enforce policies more effectively.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Correct. Exchanging contextual information improves access control decisions.

Option B: Incorrect. CPPM does not provide signature-based threat detection.

Option C: Incorrect. CPPM does not offload policy decisions; it integrates for collaboration.

Option D: Incorrect. CPPM does not replace third-party traffic filtering capabilities.

To further protect the company from internal threats, you can recommend having the third-party SRX firewall send Syslogs to HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM). ClearPass can analyze these logs to detect potential security incidents and coordinate with network devices to respond to threats. By integrating Syslog data from the firewall, CPPM can identify malicious activities and take actions such as locking internal attackers out of the network or triggering specific security policies. This approach enhances the company's internal threat detection and response capabilities.

Hub-Spoke VPN Configuration:

HPE Aruba Central SD-WAN Orchestrator enables hub-spoke topology where branch gateways (BGWs) connect to VPN concentrators (VPNCs) located at data centers.

A key step in configuring this is defining which VPNCs the BGWs will prefer for connectivity.

The DC Preference List is configured in the BGW groups to prioritize the data centers to which BGWs connect.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Incorrect. VPN pools control IP allocation, not which branches connect to VPNCs.

Option B: Incorrect. IKE policies define key exchange mechanisms but are not part of the connection preference process.

Option C: Correct. Admins configure a DC preference list in BGW groups to determine connectivity priorities with VPNCs.

Option D: Incorrect. IPsec policies define encryption parameters at a global level, but this is not specific to the hub-spoke connection configuration.

An HPE Aruba Networking Secure Web Gateway (SWG) is designed to provide secure internet access by monitoring and controlling web traffic. It primarily focuses on protecting users from malicious content and ensuring compliance with corporate security policies, particularly for hybrid and remote workers.

Explanation of Each Option

A. The organization needs a faster way to quarantine clients that have generated threats, as detected by third-party firewalls.

Incorrect:

Quarantining clients based on detected threats is typically managed by endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions or next-generation firewalls (NGFWs).

While an SWG can monitor and block risky web activity, it does not manage threat quarantine actions directly.

B. Hybrid workers are exposing their computers to risky internet sites and infection by malware when they work from home.

Correct:

SWGs monitor and control web traffic to block malicious websites and prevent exposure to malware.

They enforce web usage policies even when users work remotely, protecting against phishing, drive-by downloads, and other web-based threats.

With the proliferation of hybrid work environments, an SWG ensures that users are protected from risky sites regardless of their location.

C. Remote workers need access to private data center applications without exposing those applications to unauthorized users.

Incorrect:

This use case falls under secure access service edge (SASE) solutions with Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), not an SWG.

ZTNA focuses on granting secure, conditional access to applications, while SWGs focus on internet traffic security.

D. The organization currently has no way to prevent users from exfiltrating sensitive data from SaaS applications.

Incorrect:

Data loss prevention (DLP) tools or cloud access security brokers (CASBs) are designed for monitoring and preventing data exfiltration from SaaS applications.

While SWGs can block access to specific websites or categories, they do not offer advanced DLP capabilities for SaaS environments.

References

Aruba Secure Web Gateway Documentation.

HPE Aruba SASE Solutions Guide.

Best Practices for Hybrid Workforce Security with Aruba SWG.

To set up HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) to enforce certificate-based authentication for clients using Tunneled EAP (TEAP), you need to select an EAP-TLS-type authentication method for TEAP's inner method. TEAP allows for a combination of certificate-based (EAP-TLS) and password-based (EAP-MSCHAPv2) authentication. By choosing EAP-TLS as the inner method, you ensure that the clients are authenticated using their certificates, thus enforcing certificate-based authentication within the TEAP framework.

ClearPass Device Profiler gathers information (DHCP, HTTP user-agent, MAC OUI, RADIUS, etc.) to identify device types and roles—especially non-user devices. Aruba documentation describes using profiling to recognize and categorize devices such as IP cameras, printers, and IoT “bots”, and to supply this identity context to access control policies. ExamTopics

Typical use cases include:

Automatically identifying a device as a security camera, printer, IP phone, etc.

Using that profile to assign an appropriate role/VLAN and enforcement profile in CPPM (e.g., restricted video-surveillance VLAN).

ClearPass literature explicitly calls out that Device Profiler is used to “automatically profile devices and provide an identity context (such as cameras, printers, or bots)” that can be used in policy decisions.

Options B, C, and D are handled by vulnerability scanners, directory services, or posture/OnGuard, not by Device Profiler itself. Therefore the correct use case is Option A.

1. Understanding the Role Mapping Evaluation:

Role mapping is set to "Evaluate: Select first," meaning the first rule that matches the client attributes will determine the role(s) assigned.

Contractors group: Since the client is in the Contractors group (not Managers), Rule 1 in the Role Mapping Policy does not match.

TEAP-Method-1-Status EQUALS Success: This condition matches Rule 2, so the client is assigned the domain-comp role.

No other rules match, so the default role [Other] is not applied.

2. Resulting Role from Role Mapping Policy:

The client is assigned the domain-comp role.

3. Enforcement Policy Evaluation:

Enforcement policy is also set to "Evaluate: Select first," so the first matching rule determines the enforcement profile.

Rule 1 (Tips Role = manager AND domain-comp):

The client only has the domain-comp role, not manager, so this rule does not match.

Rule 2 (Tips Role = manager):

The client does not have the manager role, so this rule does not match.

Rule 3 (Tips Role = domain-comp):

This rule matches the client's role, but it is not evaluated because the enforcement policy already skipped to the default action after failing the first two rules.

4. Default Enforcement Profile:

Since no rule explicitly matches and the policy evaluation stops at the default, the default profile [Deny Access Profile] is applied.

Final Outcome:

The client is denied access because none of the matching rules satisfy the conditions.

References

Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager Role Mapping and Enforcement Policies Guide.

Role and Policy Evaluation Logic for ClearPass Authentication Services.

The "Detect Valid SSID Misuse" event in Aruba's Wireless Intrusion Detection System (WIDS) indicates that a valid SSID, associated with your network, is being broadcast from an unauthorized source. This scenario often signals a potential rogue access point attempting to deceive clients into connecting to it (e.g., for credential harvesting or man-in-the-middle attacks).

1. Explanation of Each Option

A. Clients are failing to authenticate to corporate SSIDs. You should first check for misconfigured authentication settings and then investigate a possible threat:

Incorrect:

This event is not related to authentication failures by legitimate clients.

Misconfigured authentication settings would lead to events like "authentication failures" or "radius issues," not "valid SSID misuse."

B. Admins have likely misconfigured SSID security settings on some of the company's APs. You should have them check those settings:

Incorrect:

This event refers to an external device broadcasting your SSID, not misconfiguration on the company’s authorized APs.

WIDS differentiates between valid corporate APs and rogue APs.

C. Hackers are likely trying to pose as authorized APs. You should use the detecting radio information and immediately track down the device that triggered the event:

Correct:

This is the most likely cause of the "detect valid SSID misuse" event. A rogue AP broadcasting a corporate SSID could lure clients into connecting to it, exposing sensitive credentials or traffic.

Immediate action includes:

Using the radio information from the event logs to identify the rogue AP's location.

Physically locating and removing the rogue device.

Strengthening WIPS/WIDS policies to prevent further misuse.

D. This event might be a threat but is almost always a false positive. You should wait to see the event over several days before following up on it:

Incorrect:

While false positives are possible, "valid SSID misuse" is a critical security event that should not be ignored.

Delaying action increases the risk of successful attacks against your network.

2. Recommended Steps to Address the Event

Review Event Logs:

Gather details about the rogue AP, such as SSID, MAC address, channel, and signal strength.

Locate the Rogue Device:

Use the detecting AP's radio information and signal strength to triangulate the rogue AP's physical location.

Respond to the Threat:

Remove or disable the rogue device.

Notify the security team for further investigation.

Prevent Future Misuse:

Strengthen security policies, such as enabling client whitelists or enhancing WIPS protection.

References

Aruba WIDS/WIPS Configuration and Best Practices Guide.

Aruba Central Security Event Analysis Documentation.

Wireless Threat Management Using Aruba Networks.

TACACS+ Enforcement Profile:

The profile specifies a Service Attribute under Aruba:Common with:

Name: Aruba-Admin-Role

Value: operators

AOS-CX Role Mapping:

On Aruba AOS-CX switches, the Aruba-Admin-Role attribute maps the authenticated user to predefined roles:

operators: Operator-level privileges (read-only access, limited commands).

administrators: Full administrator privileges.

Other roles like auditors may exist based on configuration.

Analysis:

The value operators explicitly maps the user to operator-level privileges, granting read-only access to the AOS-CX switch.

Since the Aruba-Admin-Role is correctly set and recognized, the switch assigns the appropriate role without errors.

Option Breakdown:

Option A: Correct. The switch assigns operator-level privileges based on the Aruba-Admin-Role value.

Option B: Incorrect. Administrator-level privileges require the role value to be administrators.

Option C: Incorrect. The manager is successfully authenticated and authorized; there is no error.

Option D: Incorrect. There is no reference to an auditor role in the configuration shown.

Conclusion:

The operators value in the TACACS+ enforcement profile ensures that the manager is assigned operator-level privileges on the AOS-CX switch.

The exhibit reveals duplicate IP addresses detected for 10.1.140.6, associated with two different MAC addresses:

88:56:56:ab:c6:89

88:13:30:a3:02:00

Key observations:

Duplicate IP Address Detection:

The message "Duplicate IP address detected for 10.1.140.6" clearly indicates two devices claiming the same IP address.

This typically occurs when one device spoofs the MAC address of another device to intercept or disrupt traffic.

MAC Spoofing Context:

MAC spoofing is a tactic used to impersonate another device's hardware address to gain unauthorized access to a network.

By spoofing a legitimate IP-MAC pairing, an attacker can bypass security mechanisms or cause denial-of-service conditions.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect:

Option B (Mirroring Misconfigured): While mirroring misconfiguration can duplicate traffic, it does not lead to a "duplicate IP detected" alert.

Option C (Misconfigured DHCP): Misconfigurations usually result in DHCP conflicts, but they do not typically involve two different MAC addresses for the same IP.

Option D (ARP Poisoning/MITM): ARP poisoning involves falsified ARP tables, but it does not directly trigger duplicate IP address detection. Instead, ARP packets flood the network.

Conclusion:

The evidence strongly suggests MAC spoofing, as two different MAC addresses are claiming the same IP address (10.1.140.6). This behavior is typical of attempts to gain unauthorized access or disrupt network operations.

The use case for the HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass OnGuard dissolvable agent is implementing a one-time compliance scan. The dissolvable agent is designed to perform a compliance check without requiring a permanent installation on the client device. This is ideal for environments where a quick, temporary assessment of the device's security posture is needed without the overhead of a persistent agent.

1.Dissolvable Agent: The dissolvable agent is downloaded and executed on the client device for a single session, performing the necessary compliance checks before being removed automatically.

2.One-time Compliance Scan: This method is particularly useful for guest or unmanaged devices where a temporary compliance scan is sufficient to ensure security standards are met.

3.Minimal Impact: Since the agent does not persist on the client device, it minimizes the impact on the user's system and does not require ongoing maintenance or updates.

To ensure that HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) can apply the correct access levels based on a client's device category after discovering new clients, you need to enable the "Profile Endpoints" option in the Service tab. This option allows CPPM to profile and categorize endpoints dynamically, ensuring that the appropriate access levels are applied based on the device's characteristics. Enabling this feature ensures that new devices are accurately profiled and that access policies can be enforced based on the updated device information.

Integration of CPDI and CPPM for Zero Trust:

CPDI (ClearPass Device Insight) identifies and profiles devices and applications on the network.

CPDI can tag devices based on their behavior or detected applications.

CPPM uses these tags to enforce policies, such as quarantining clients that violate security rules (e.g., using prohibited applications).

Option Analysis:

Option A: Incorrect. CPPM does not inform CPDI about role assignments; CPDI provides device context to CPPM.

Option B: Correct. CPDI tags clients, and CPPM uses those tags to enforce quarantine or other Zero Trust actions.

Option C: Incorrect. Custom fingerprint definitions are not part of this integration.

Option D: Incorrect. CPDI provides information about devices, not user identities.

HPE Aruba Networking ZTNA (delivered as part of Aruba SSE) replaces traditional network-level VPN access with application-level access. Key security advantages highlighted in Aruba ZTNA/SSE collateral include:

Applications are no longer exposed directly to the internet; instead, they are fronted by the ZTNA service.

Inbound connectivity to private apps is outbound-only via connectors, eliminating open listening ports and shrinking the external attack surface. www6.h3c.com

Users are granted access only to specific applications, not entire subnets, thereby limiting lateral movement and the blast radius of a compromise.

Aruba documentation explicitly notes that ZTNA “reduces the overall attack surface” and avoids the broad network exposure inherent in classic client-to-site VPNs.

Thus, the most accurate advantage is: ZTNA shrinks the attack surface, eliminating publicly exposed ports and reducing the extent of the private network exposed to remote users → Option D.