ISTQB CT-AI Dumps

The ISTQB CT-AI syllabus (Section4.3 – Test Environments for AI Systems) describes that, unlike conventional software testing, testing AI systems may requirespecialized toolsfor analyzing and explaining the decisions of ML models. This includes visualization tools, explainability frameworks, and diagnostic utilities to understand why the AI made a certain prediction. Since AI decisions may be non-transparent, the test environment must supportexplainability, making OptionBcorrect.

Option A is incorrect: the syllabus does not state that an autonomous AI system requires an autonomous test environment. Option C is incorrect because test environments mustnot learn; they must remain stable to avoid unpredictable testing conditions. Option D is incorrect because multi-agent systems often involve stochastic interactions, and determinism is neither required nor realistic.

Thus,Option Bis the syllabus-accurate choice.

 Technology Most Typically Used to Implement AI:Genetic algorithms are a well-known technique used in AI. They are inspired by the process of natural selection and are used to find approximate solutions to optimization and search problems. Unlike search engines, procedural programming, or case control structures, genetic algorithms are specifically designed for evolving solutions and are commonly employed in AI implementations.

 Reference:ISTQB_CT-AI_Syllabus_v1.0, Section 1.4 AI Technologies, which identifies different technologies used to implement AI​​.

Flexibility in AI systems is crucial for various reasons, particularly because it allows for easier modification and adaptation of the system as a whole.

AI systems are inherently flexible (A): This statement is not correct. While some AI systems may be designed to be flexible, they are not inherently flexible by nature. Flexibility depends on the system's design and implementation.

AI systems require changing operational environments; therefore, flexibility is required (B): While it's true that AI systems may need to operate in changing environments, this statement does not directly address the importance of flexibility for the modification of the system.

Flexible AI systems allow for easier modification of the system as a whole (C): This statement correctly describes the importance of flexibility. Being able to modify AI systems easily is critical for their maintenance, adaptation to new requirements, and improvement.

Self-learning systems are expected to deal with new situations without explicitly having to program for it (D): This statement relates to the adaptability of self-learning systems rather than their overall flexibility for modification.

Hence, the correct answer isC. Flexible AI systems allow for easier modification of the system as a whole.

The syllabus discusses using AI-based tools to reduce GUI test brittleness:

"AI can be used to reduce the brittleness of this approach, by employing AI-based tools to identify the correct objects using various criteria (e.g., XPath, label, id, class, X/Y coordinates), and to choose the historically most stable identification criteria."

(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 11.6.1)

The syllabus defines overfitting as:

“Overfitting is when the ML model learns the training data so well that it is unable to generalize to accommodate new data.”

This occurs when the model memorizes the training data, including noise, instead of learning the general patterns.

(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 3.5.1, page 31 of 99)

The ISTQB CT-AI syllabus (Section5.3 – AI Support for Defect Analysis) explains that AI can categorize defect reports using natural language processing or classification models. Categorization helps route defects efficiently and determine which areas of the system are affected. Thus, OptionCis correct: AI canidentify defect categories, supporting assignment and triage.

Option A is incorrect because ML cannot infer severity or consequence without domain-specific risk modeling. Option B inaccurately ties duplicate detection to criticality; the syllabus separatesduplicate detectionfromseverity analysis. Option D is incorrect because AI may assist in routing defects using categories, but the syllabus does not claim AI identifies specific developers.

Thus,Option Cis the syllabus-accurate statement.

The syllabus highlights that on-device training and processing require considerable computational power, which may exceed the capabilities of some mobile devices:

"Self-learning and continuous learning systems require large amounts of computational power, which can impact system performance and stability if the hardware is not powerful enough."

(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 2.3, page 22 of 99)

AI test environments have several unique characteristics that differentiate them from traditional test environments. Let’s evaluate each option:

A. Challenges resulting from low accuracy of the models.

Low accuracy is a common challenge in AI systems, especially during initial development and training phases. Ensuring the model performs accurately in varied and unpredictable scenarios is a critical aspect of AI testing.

B. The challenge of mimicking undefined scenarios generated due to self-learning.

AI systems, particularly those that involve machine learning, can generate undefined or unexpected scenarios due to their self-learning capabilities. Mimicking and testing these scenarios is a unique challenge in AI environments.

C. The challenge of providing explainability to the decisions made by the system.

Explainability, or the ability to understand and articulate how an AI system arrives at its decisions, is a significant and unique challenge in AI testing. This is crucial for trust and transparency in AI systems.

D. Challenges in the creation of scenarios of human handover for autonomous systems.

While important, the creation of scenarios for human handover in autonomous systems is not a characteristic unique to AI test environments. It is more related to the operational and deployment challenges of autonomous systems rather than the intrinsic technology-related characteristics of AI.

Given the above points, optionDis the correct answer because it describes a challenge related to operational deployment rather than a technology-related characteristic unique to AI test environments.

The syllabus mentions that experience-based testing and EDA are effective for detecting biases:

“Experience-based testing can be used to verify that the training dataset is operationally relevant and identify potential sources of bias. EDA is also useful for exploring the data and understanding any relationships that might lead to bias in the model.”

(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 8.3, page 58 of 99)

The syllabus explains that EDA can be used to analyze data to identify outliers and unusual patterns, which can indicate adversarial attacks like data poisoning:

"Testing to detect data poisoning is possible using EDA, as poisoned data may show up as outliers."

(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 9.1.2, page 67 of 99)

The ISTQB CT-AI syllabus describes theML data preparation workflowin Section2.2 – Data Preparation. Data preparation consists ofdata gathering,cleaning,transformation, andsampling. The syllabus emphasizes that one significant challenge duringdata gatheringis combining data frommultiple heterogeneous sources, which often differ in structure, quality, and format. Ensuring the resulting dataset is accurate, complete, and representative can be complex, making this a critical challenge in the ML workflow. This aligns directly with OptionC.

Option A is incorrect because erroneous data correction is part ofcleaning, not transformation. Option B contradicts the syllabus: while automation can help,not all steps should be automateddue to the need for expert oversight, especially in detecting subtle data quality issues. Option D is incorrect because sampling continues to involve risk—particularly around representativeness—and the syllabus emphasizes caution, not complacency.

Thus, OptionCis the only statement that accurately reflects the syllabus.

Section2.10 – Explainability and Transparencyof the ISTQB CT-AI syllabus describes explainable AI as the ability of a system to provide human-understandable insight into its decisions. The syllabus referencesThe Royal Society’s reportas a foundational source explaining why explainability is important. Among the stated motivations is the need toincrease user trust and confidencein AI systems by making their decisions understandable and justifiable. Therefore, OptionCdirectly reflects the syllabus content .

Option A is incorrect because interpretability doesnotrefer to determining correctness of outputs; rather, it refers to understandinghowthe model arrives at outputs. Option B incorrectly frames explainability as the ability to investigate algorithms or training data; explainability is aboutunderstanding the model’s decision-making, not reverse engineering its components. Option D is incorrect because explainability doesnoteliminate the need for risk and vulnerability assessments; the syllabus clearly emphasizes that testing, risk assessment, and robustness checks remain critical even when a model is explainable.

Thus, the only statement consistent with the syllabus isOption C.

The ISTQB CT-AI syllabus (Section5.2 – AI for Testing) explains that various AI approaches can support testing activities. Probabilistic methods—one of the three major AI technique groups—are used topredict system failures, especially when dealing with uncertainty, likelihood estimation, and reliability analysis. This aligns precisely with OptionB.

Option A is incorrect because regression test optimization is typically performed usingsearch-based optimization, not classification. Option C is incorrect because fuzzy logic is more suited to reasoning under vagueness, not generating test cases. Option D is incorrect: defect prediction relies on statistical learning or classification models, not computational optimization.

Thus,Option Bis the most syllabus-consistent mapping of AI techniques to testing tasks.

The syllabus states:

“A/B testing can be used to test updates to an AI-based system where there are agreed acceptance criteria, such as ML functional performance metrics, as described in Chapter 5. A/B testing is used to compare the updated variant with the previous variant.”

(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 9.4, page 68 of 99)

The syllabus states:

"Concept drift occurs when the operational environment changes without the trained model changing correspondingly. The outputs of the model become less accurate and less useful. Therefore, the operational model should be regularly evaluated against its acceptance criteria."

(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 7.6, Page 54 of 99)

A. Feature selection

Feature selection is the process of selecting the most relevant features from the data. While important, it is not directly about handling excess data.

B. Data sampling

Data sampling involves selecting a representative subset of the data for training. When there is more data than needed, sampling can be used to create a manageable dataset that maintains the statistical properties of the full dataset.

C. Data labeling

Data labeling involves annotating data for supervised learning. It is necessary for training models but does not address the issue of having excess data.

D. Data augmentation

Data augmentation is used to increase the size of the training dataset by creating modified versions of existing data. It is useful when there is insufficient data, not when there is excess data.

Therefore, the correct answer isBbecause data sampling is the most relevant activity when dealing with an excess amount of data for training​​.

Setting model and algorithm hyperparameters is an essential step in the machine learning workflow, primarily occurring during the tuning phase.

Evaluating the model (A): This stage involves assessing the model's performance using metrics and does not typically include the setting of hyperparameters.

Deploying the model (B): Deployment is the stage where the model is put into production and used in real-world applications. Hyperparameters should already be set before this stage.

Tuning the model (C): This is the correct stage where hyperparameters are set. Tuning involves adjusting the hyperparameters to optimize the model's performance.

Data testing (D): Data testing involves ensuring the quality and integrity of the data used for training and testing the model. It does not include setting hyperparameters.

Hence, the most appropriate stage of the ML workflow to set model and algorithm hyperparameters isC. Tuning the model.

The ISTQB CT-AI syllabus explains supervised learning under Section1.6 – Machine Learning Approaches. It definesclassificationas predictingcategorical labels, whereasregressionpredictscontinuous numerical values. OptionB—deciding whether an object is a bicycle or a motorcycle—fits the definition of classification precisely because the model chooses between discrete categories. The syllabus also uses similar examples to illustrate classification tasks, reinforcing that this is the correct interpretation .

Option A is incorrect because image recognition of a dog is aclassificationtask, not regression. Option C is incorrect because predicting a 10% price rise involves forecasting anumerical value, which is aregressionproblem. Option D is incorrect because classification can involveany number of classes, not only two. Multiclass classification is explicitly mentioned in the syllabus.

Therefore, OptionBis the only answer aligned with the syllabus’ definitions.

The ISTQB CT-AI syllabus explains in Section3.2 – Functional Performance Criteria of ML Modelsthat accuracy becomes unreliable whenclass imbalanceexists. In fraud detection, more than 99% of transactions are non-fraudulent, meaning the dataset is extremely imbalanced. Because accuracy counts all correct non-fraudulent classifications, it will appear artificially high, even if the fraud detection performance is poor. Therefore, accuracy is not suitable for evaluating fraud detection systems.

The syllabus further explains thatsensitivity (recall)captures the proportion of correctly identified fraudulent cases. This metric is important, as missing fraudulent events can cause high financial loss. However, the client also stresses thatlegitimate transactions must be correctly identified, meaningfalse positives must be minimizedto maintain customer satisfaction.

TheF1 score, defined as the harmonic mean ofprecision and recall, balances both:

Precision protects legitimate customers by minimizing false alarms.

Recall ensures fraudulent transactions are detected.

Section 3.2 emphasizes that when both false positives and false negatives have significant consequences, and the data is highly imbalanced,F1 is the most appropriate metricbecause it reflects the combined importance of detecting fraud while avoiding unnecessary alerts. Thus,Option Cis the correct choice.

The ISTQB CT-AI syllabus states in Section2.10 – Explainability, Transparency, and Interpretabilitythat interpretability isuser-dependent, meaning different users understand explanations differently. This is because interpretability depends not only on the ML algorithm but also on the user’s domain knowledge, experience, and expectations. OptionBdirectly reflects this syllabus principle: interpretability testing must consideruser background, and explanations must be comprehensible to the intended user group.

Option A is incorrect because explainability testing requires substantial information about the model, data, and expected behavior—not just exploratory effort. Option C is incorrect because explainability isnotgenerally quantifiable through dynamic testing alone, and the syllabus does not assert model-type specificity in this way. Option D exaggerates LIME’s capabilities. LIME offers approximate local explanations, but cannotpreciselystate root causes; the syllabus emphasizes itslimitationsand that explanations areapproximations, not exact reasons.

Therefore,Option Bis the most syllabus-aligned and correct statement.

According to the syllabus, pre-trained models often inherit biases and limitations from the data and processes used in their original training, which may not align with the new use case. Specifically, the syllabus states:

"When using a pre-trained model, the training data and process cannot be fully controlled or known by the user of the model. As a result, the model can inherit biases or inaccuracies that were part of its original development and training process."

(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 1.8.3)

The syllabus defines back-to-back testing as a method to compare a modified AI system to the previous version, which is ideal in this scenario:

"Back-to-back testing is performed by comparing the outputs of two systems that are supposed to provide the same outputs, one being a known and trusted system and the other being the test system. This approach can be used to test ML systems after re-training to verify that improvements have not introduced regressions."

(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 9.3, page 67 of 99)

 A. This statement is incorrect. Current AI is true AI and there is no reason to believe that this fact will change over time.

AI is an evolving field, and the definition of what constitutes AI can change as technology advances.

 B. This statement is correct. In general, what is considered AI today may change over time.

The term AI is dynamic and has evolved over the years. What is considered AI today might be viewed as standard computing in the future. Historically, as technologies become mainstream, they often cease to be considered "AI".

 C. This statement is incorrect. What is considered AI today will continue to be AI even as technology evolves and changes.

This perspective does not account for the historical evolution of the definition of AI. As new technologies emerge, the boundaries of AI shift.

 D. This statement is correct. In general, today the term AI is utilized incorrectly.

While some may argue this, it is not a universal truth. The term AI encompasses a broad range of technologies and applications, and its usage is generally consistent with current technological capabilities.

Section4.2 – Test Coverage Criteria for AI Modelsof the ISTQB CT-AI syllabus describes neural network–specific coverage methods. Among the techniques,threshold coverageis explicitly noted asadaptable, meaning testers may choose different thresholds to determine whether neuron activation is considered “covered.” This flexibility makes threshold coverage adjustable to the model architecture, problem domain, and required test thoroughness.

Options A and B (Sign–Sign and Sign–Change coverage) are more rigid structural criteria and are not described as adaptable within the syllabus. They focus on sign patterns of neuron activations and do not allow altering thresholds. Option D, neuron coverage, measures the proportion of neurons activated at least once. Although simple, it is not defined as an adaptable criterion. Its limitations are documented: it provides shallow insight and too easily achieves high coverage.

Onlythreshold coverageallows testers to adjust activation thresholds for more refined coverage measurement, makingOption Cthe correct choice.

The ISTQB CT-AI syllabus (Section4.3 – Test Design for AI-Based Systems) highlights pairwise testing as an effectivetest-case reduction techniquefor systems with many input parameters. Lane-keeping assist systems typically include environmental, sensor, and vehicle-dynamic parameters, making exhaustive testing infeasible. Pairwise testing significantly reduces the number of test cases while still capturingall 2-way interactions, which are responsible for a large proportion of software defects.

OptionBaligns with this syllabus description: pairwise testing reduces otherwise extremely large parameter combinations, making test effort manageable.

Option A overstates feasibility guarantees; the syllabus never claims pairwise testing always makes testing “typically feasible.” Option C is unsupported and incorrect because pairwise testing doesnotrestrict parameters to driver-controlled ones. Option D is incorrect because, although some defects arise from higher-order interactions, pairwise testing captures many relevant defects and is widely recognized as a pragmatic compromise.

Thus,Option Bis the correct statement.

TheAI Effectis clearly defined in theISTQB Certified Tester AI Testing Syllabus v1.0under Section1.1 – Definition of AI and AI Effect. The document explains that society’s understanding of what qualifies as “AI” changes over time. Technologies once considered AI—such as expert systems from the 1970s and 1980s or early chess-playing systems—are no longer viewed as AI today. This phenomenon is explicitly labeled the“AI Effect,”described as“the changing perception of what constitutes AI.”The syllabus states that as AI capabilities become routine or widely implemented, they often stop being perceived as true artificial intelligence .

Options B, C, and D do not capture this definition. While AI learning from data (B) is a property of ML, it does not describe the shifting perception of AI. Option C describes a technological achievement, not a perceptual shift. Option D references a historical AI milestone (Deep Blue defeating Kasparov) that the syllabus specifically uses as an example of technology that is no longer considered AI due to the AI Effect. Therefore, onlyOption Aaccurately reflects the AI Effect as defined by the ISTQB syllabus.

The ISTQB CT-AI syllabus explains in Section1.6 – Machine Learning Approachesthatsupervised learningis appropriate when labeled data exists and the goal is to predict an output based on known historical examples. Predicting a customer’spurchase probabilityis aclassificationtask when the output corresponds to discrete categories such as“likely to purchase”vs.“not likely to purchase.”The syllabus gives similar examples in describing classification as the process of assigning instances to predefined classes based on learned patterns in labeled data. Because the retail company wants to determine whether a customer will make a purchase based on marketing actions, classification is the most appropriate choice .

Option A (regression) predicts continuous numeric values and is less suitable because the task centers oncategorical likelihood, not estimating exact monetary values. Option C (unsupervised learning) is used when labels are not available—here, the company has labeled purchase histories. Option D (reinforcement learning) requires an interactive environment with reward-driven behavior, which is not applicable to this scenario.

Thus,supervised learning (classification)is the most suitable approach according to the syllabus.

 Testing Autonomy:Testing for human handover when it should not be relinquishing control is the least appropriate because it contradicts the very definition of autonomous systems. The other tests are relevant to ensuring smooth operation and transitions between human and AI control.

 Reference:ISTQB_CT-AI_Syllabus_v1.0, Sections on Testing Autonomous AI-Based Systems and Testing for Human-AI Interaction​​​​. ​

A/B testing, also known as split testing, is a method used to compare two versions of a product or system to determine which one performs better. It is widely used in web development, marketing, and machine learning to optimize user experiences and model performance. Here’s why option C is the least descriptive of an A/B testing scenario:

Understanding A/B Testing:

In A/B testing, two versions (A and B) of a system or feature are tested against each other. The objective is to measure which version performs better based on predefined metrics such as user engagement, conversion rates, or other performance indicators.

Application in Machine Learning:

In ML systems, A/B testing might involve comparing two different models, algorithms, or system configurations on the same set of data to observe which yields better results.

Why Option C is the Least Descriptive:

Option C describes comparing the performance of an ML system on two different input datasets. This scenario focuses on the input data variation rather than the comparison of system versions or features, which is the essence of A/B testing. A/B testing typically involves a controlled experiment with two versions being tested under the same conditions, not different datasets.

Clarifying the Other Options:

A. A comparison of two different websites for the same company to observe from a user acceptance perspective: This is a classic example of A/B testing where two versions of a website are compared.

B. A comparison of two different offers in a recommendation system to decide on the more effective offer for the same users: This is another example of A/B testing in a recommendation system.

D. A comparison of the performance of two different ML implementations on the same input data: This fits the A/B testing model where two implementations are compared under the same conditions.

The question refers to a problem where data used for an object detection ML system was labelled incorrectly. This issue is most closely related to "accuracy issues." Here's a detailed explanation:

Accuracy Issues: The primary goal of labeling data in machine learning is to ensure that the model can accurately learn and make predictions based on the given labels. Incorrectly labeled data directly impacts the model's accuracy, leading to poor performance because the model learns incorrect patterns.

Why Not Other Options:

Security Issues: This pertains to data breaches or unauthorized access, which is not relevant to the problem of incorrect data labeling.

Privacy Issues: This concerns the protection of personal data and is not related to the accuracy of data labeling.

Bias Issues: While bias in data can affect model performance, it specifically refers to systematic errors or prejudices in the data rather than outright incorrect labeling.

The question asks which combination of tests would be most appropriate to include in the strategy for optimal detection in a workflow system using multiple ML models.

Pairwise testing of combinations (I): This method is useful for testing interactions between different components in the workflow to ensure they work well together, identifying potential issues in the integration.

Testing each individual model for accuracy (II): Ensuring that each model in the workflow performs accurately on its own is crucial before integrating them into a combined workflow.

A/B testing of different sequences of models (III): This involves comparing different sequences to determine which configuration yields the best results. While useful, it might not be as fundamental as pairwise and individual accuracy testing in the initial stages.

The syllabus highlights that testing for unnecessary human intervention is a key focus for autonomous AI-based systems:

"For autonomous AI-based systems, testers must ensure that the system does not prompt for unnecessary human intervention, as this contradicts the autonomy concept."

(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 8.2, page 59 of 99)

A. This is an example of expert system bias.

Expert system bias refers to bias introduced by the rules or logic defined by experts in the system, not by the data distribution.

B. This is an example of sample bias.

Sample bias occurs when the training data is not representative of the overall population that the model will encounter in practice. In this case, the over-representation of ethnicity A (70%) compared to B, C, and D (30%) creates a sample bias, as the model may become biased towards better performance on ethnicity A.

C. This is an example of hyperparameter bias.

Hyperparameter bias relates to the settings and configurations used during the training process, not the data distribution itself.

D. This is an example of algorithmic bias.

Algorithmic bias refers to biases introduced by the algorithmic processes and decision-making rules, not directly by the distribution of training data.

Based on the provided information, optionB(sample bias) best describes the situation because the training data is skewed towards ethnicity A, potentially leading to biased model performance​​.

The ISTQB CT-AI syllabus describes severaldata quality aspectsthat affect ML performance. In Section2.2 – Data Preparation, it explains that datasets may suffer from issues such asincomplete data,irrelevant data,incorrect data,unbalanced data, or data lacking preprocessing. “Incomplete data” means thatportions of the required data are missing, often because some time periods, records, or sources were not captured. This aligns exactly with Option A, which correctly identifies missing intervals as incomplete data.

Option B is incorrect: “data not preprocessed” refers to data that has not undergone normalization, cleaning, or transformation—not data recorded incorrectly. Option C is wrong because irrelevant datadoesnegatively affect ML models by introducing noise and unnecessary features. The syllabus explicitly states that including irrelevant features can degrade model learning. Option D is incorrect: “unbalanced data” relates todisproportionate class distribution, not recency or freshness of data.

Thus, OptionAis the only statement that correctly matches the syllabus definition of this data quality aspect.

According to the syllabus,conventional AIsystems are limited to specific, pre-defined tasks and do not have generalized intelligence:

"Conventional AI systems are limited in their scope and typically only perform specific tasks within the domain for which they have been designed. They do not exhibit general AI behavior."

(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 1.2)

Section1.7 – Neural Networksof the ISTQB CT-AI syllabus explains that neural networks consist of neurons connected by weighted links. During training,learning occurs by adjusting the weights on these connections. This is the essence of gradient descent and backpropagation. Option B correctly states this behavior: only theweightsare modified, not the activation functions, neuron counts, or architectural structure.

Option A is incorrect because a neuron’sbiasis not determined by previous activations; it is an independent trainable parameter added to the weighted input sum. Option C is incorrect because the syllabus states that asingle-layer perceptron is a valid type of neural network, although limited to linearly separable problems. Option D is incorrect because no rule requires the number of input neurons to exceed or equal the number of output neurons. Instead, input neurons correspond to thenumber of features, while output neurons correspond totasks or classes.

Therefore,Option Bprecisely reflects the syllabus definition of what changes during neural network training.