Juniper JN0-650 Dumps

Junos OS 24.4 provides several server-failover options for 802.1X authentication to maintain network availability when the RADIUS server is unreachable.

Fallback Behavior (Option D):Theuse-cachefallback action allows the switch to consult its local cache of previously authenticated MAC addresses.

If a device was already authorized and its information is in the cache, the switch willcontinue to permit accessbased on those cached credentials.

However, if a new device (not in the cache) attempts to connect while the server is down, the switch cannot verify its credentials and willdeny the access attempt. This matches the specific requirement to permit authorized devices while denying new ones.

Other Fallback Options:

permit (Option C):This would allowalldevices (even new ones) to access the network, typically in a restricted "guest" or "bypass" VLAN.

deny (Option A):This would drop all traffic from all devices on the port if the server is unreachable.

vlan-name (Option B):This moves authenticated or unauthenticated users into a specific fallback VLAN.

To interoperate with Cisco switches runningPer-VLAN Spanning Tree Plus (PVST+), Juniper devices must useVLAN Spanning Tree Protocol (VSTP).

PVST+ Compatibility:VSTP is specifically designed to handle the per-VLAN BPDU requirements of Cisco's PVST+. It generates a separate spanning tree instance for each VLAN and uses the same multicast destination MAC address as Cisco devices.

Other Protocols:MSTP (B) is used for grouping VLANs into regions; RSTP (D) is a single-instance protocol (IEEE 802.1w) and is generally incompatible with per-VLAN BPDU requirements without additional configuration.

The exhibit shows a customBehavior Aggregate (BA) classifiernamed my-classifier for the Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) protocol.

Importing Defaults (Statement C):The configuration line import default; is crucial. In Junos OS, when you create a custom classifier, you can use this statement toimport the default mapping tablefor all code points that you have not explicitly defined in the current block. This ensures that only the specific traffic types you care about are customized while the rest follows industry-standard defaults.

Logical Interface Association (Statement A):In the Junos class-of-service hierarchy, classifiers are typically applied tological interfaces(e.g., ge-0/0/0.0). While they can sometimes be applied at a higher level, the standard practice for enterprise routing and switching is to associate them with the logical unit to provide granular control over subinterfaces or VLAN-tagged traffic.

Why others are incorrect:Statement B is less accurate because the primary binding point in Junos is the unit (logical interface). Statement D is incorrect because the specific classifications defined in the custom blockoverridethe defaults; they are not overwritten by them.

The exhibit illustrates an Autonomous System (AS 65512) receiving the same prefix ($203.0.113.0/24$) from two different neighbors, ISP A and ISP B. To influence outbound traffic from AS 65512 so that ISP A is preferred, you must manipulate the BGP Local Preference attribute.BGP Path Selection and Local Preference: Local preference is the first attribute evaluated by BGP after checking if the next hop is reachable. A higher local preference value is always preferred over a lower one. The default value in Junos OS is 100.Applying the Preference (Option B): By applying an import policy on router R1 to set a local preference higher than 100 (e.g., 200) for routes from ISP A, R1, R2, and R3 will all prefer the path through R1 to reach ISP A.Applying the Preference (Option C): Alternatively, you can achieve the same result by applying an import policy on R2 to set a local preference lower than 100 (e.g., 50) for routes from ISP B. Since the routes from R1 remain at the default of 100, the path through ISP A (100) will be preferred over ISP B (50).Why A and D are incorrect: Setting a lower preference for ISP A (Option A) or a higher preference for ISP B (Option D) would result in ISP B being preferred for outbound traffic, which is the opposite of the requirement.

The exhibit illustrates anEVPN-VXLANfabric using multi-homing. Server1 is dual-homed to Leaf1 and Leaf2 using anEthernet Segment Identifier (ESI)in an active-active or active-standby configuration. Server2 is single-homed to Leaf3.

In EVPN environments, specific mechanisms are used to prevent loops and duplicate traffic when dealing with Broadcast, Unknown Unicast, and Multicast (BUM) traffic:

Broadcast Propagation (Option A):When Server2 (connected to Leaf3) generates a broadcast frame, Leaf3 encapsulates this traffic into a VXLAN tunnel and forwards it to all other VTEPs (Virtual Tunnel End Points) that participate in that specific Virtual Network Instance (VNI). Therefore, both Leaf1 and Leaf2 will receive the broadcast frame from the core fabric.

Designated Forwarder (DF) Election (Option C):To prevent a multi-homed device (like Server1) from receiving duplicate copies of the same broadcast frame from multiple leaf switches, EVPN utilizes aDesignated Forwarder (DF). For a given ESI, only one leaf switch is elected as the DF.

The exhibit explicitly states thatLeaf2 is the Designated Forwarder.

According to the Junos EVPN implementation, only the DF is responsible for decapsulating BUM traffic received from the core and forwarding it to the local access segment.

While Leaf1 receives the frame (Option A), it will see that it is not the DF for that segment and will drop the frame rather than forwarding it to Server1. This ensures Server1 receives exactly one copy of the broadcast, delivered by Leaf2.

Option B is incorrectbecause in a standard ingress replication or multicast-based underlay, all VTEPs in the VNI receive the broadcast.

Option D is incorrectbecause Leaf1 is the non-designated forwarder (non-DF) for this segment and is prohibited from forwarding BUM traffic to the ESI.

Private VLANs (PVLANs) provide Layer 2 isolation between ports within the same broadcast domain. When a PVLAN spans multiple switches, a special type of trunk configuration is required to maintain the isolation and community logic across the inter-switch links.

Isolated VLAN Trunking (Option D):To extend an isolated VLAN across multiple switches, you must configure the trunk port on each switch to allow the isolated VLAN ID. In Junos OS, this is specifically achieved by configuring the interface as a trunk and associating it with the primary VLAN and the specific isolated VLAN. The correct syntax for enabling this inter-switch communication is to configure trunk ports that recognize the isolated VLAN tag (e.g., set interfaces unit 0 family ethernet-switching vlan members [ primary-vlan isolated-vlan ]).

Forwarding Rules:Traffic from an isolated port on Switch A must reach a promiscuous port (often on Switch B) to exit the PVLAN. The inter-switch trunk carries this traffic using the secondary (isolated) VLAN ID, ensuring that it remains isolated from other host ports on the remote switch.

Option A (inter-switch-link):In standard Junos switching, the inter-switch-link statement is used in Virtual Chassis or specific fabric designs, but for standard PVLAN extension, standard 802.1Q trunking with secondary VLAN IDs is the mechanism used.

Options B and C:These describe specific portroles(isolated vs. community) rather than the method used to enable trunking between switches.

OSPF stub areas are used to reduce the size of the Link-State Database (LSDB) in routers with limited resources by restricting the flooding of external routes.

Virtual Links (Option C):According to OSPF standards (both v2 and v3),virtual links cannot pass through stub areas. A virtual link must transit a "transit area," which must be a standard (non-stub) area with a full routing table.

Totally Stubby Areas (Option D):A stub area (which blocks Type 5 External LSAs) can be further restricted into atotally stubby area. In Junos OS, this is done by adding the no-summaries statement to the stub configuration. This blocks both Type 5 and Type 3 (Inter-area) LSAs, replacing them with a single default route.

Incorrect Statements:Option Ais incorrect because standard stub areas cannot contain an ASBR; only Not-So-Stubby Areas (NSSA) allow for an ASBR.Option Bis incorrect because an area is either a Stub or an NSSA; they are mutually exclusive configurations for the same area.

In an EVPN-VXLAN architecture, the interaction between the control plane (EVPN) and the data plane (VXLAN) is defined by specific functional components:

VTEP (VXLAN Tunnel End Point):These are the entities responsible for theencapsulation and de-encapsulationof Layer 2 Ethernet frames into Layer 3 UDP/IP packets. A VTEP can be a physical switch (like a QFX or EX series) or a software-based entity. When traffic enters the fabric, the ingress VTEP wraps it in a VXLAN header; the egress VTEP removes this header before delivering it to the destination host. (Option B)

VNI (Virtual Network Identifier):The VNI is a 24-bit field in the VXLAN header that allows for up to 16 million unique identifiers. It is used toidentify specific broadcast domains(or VLANs) within the overlay network. Each VNI effectively represents a virtualized Layer 2 segment that is stretched across the Layer 3 underlay. (Option D)

Incorrect statements:Option Ais incorrect because VNIs are identifiers, not the "engine" that performs encapsulation—that is the VTEP's job.Option Cis incorrect because VTEPs identify the endpoints of a tunnel, not the individual broadcast domains themselves.

The exhibit displays the default-switch.evpn.0 routing table, which is used on Juniper leaf devices to store EVPN Type 2 (MAC/IP) routes.

Route Distinguisher (Option C):In EVPN, theRoute Distinguisher (RD)is an 8-byte prefix added to a route to make it unique within the BGP control plane. The RD format in the exhibit is :.

For example, the prefix 2:192.168.100.1:1::5010::... indicates an EVPN Type 2 route (2:) where 192.168.100.1:1 is theRoute Distinguisher.

This RD identifies the specific routing instance on the originating VTEP that advertised the MAC/IP address.

Option A is incorrect:The RD 192.168.100.2:1 does not necessarily mean thehostdevice has that IP; it means theoriginating switchhas that router ID/IP used for its RD.

Option B is incorrect:While the RD oftenincorporatesthe router ID, the RD itself is the full string (e.g., 192.168.100.1:1), which is distinct from the raw Router ID used in the BGP summary.

Option D is incorrect:Looking at the entries for 10.1.1.1 and 10.1.2.3, they are associated with different identifiers in the RD strings (5010 and 5020 respectively), which typically map to different VNIs or bridge domains.

In External BGP (EBGP), there is a default safety mechanism that requires the peer's next hop to be on a directly connected network.

TTL Constraint: By default, EBGP packets are sent with a Time-to-Live (TTL) value of 1. If the next hop is not directly connected (e.g., when peering via loopback interfaces or across a multi-hop path), the packet will expire before reaching the destination, causing the route to be discarded or the session to fail.

The Multihop Solution (Option B): To override this behavior, you must configure the multihop statement under the BGP neighbor or group hierarchy. This allows the BGP session to establish by increasing the TTL (typically to 64 or a user-defined value) and bypasses the "directly connected" check.

Incorrect Options: Option A (accept-remote-nexthop) is used in internal BGP or specific routing-instance scenarios to resolve next hops that aren't in the local routing table, but it doesn't solve the EBGP TTL/direct-connection requirement. Option C (advertise-inactive) allows BGP to advertise routes that are not the best path in the routing table, which is irrelevant to next-hop reachability. Option D (multipath) is used for load-sharing across multiple paths.

In Junos OS Class of Service (CoS) processing, there is a specific order of operation for packet classification.

Precedence of Multifield (MF) Classifiers:When both a Behavior Aggregate (BA) classifier and a Multifield (MF) classifier are applied to an interface, theMF classifier takes precedence.

Processing Order:

The BA classifier (e.g., DSCP or 802.1p) inspects the packet header and assigns an initial forwarding class and loss priority.

The MF classifier (which looks at multiple fields like source/destination IP and port) is processed later in the pipeline.

The "Final Word":Because the MF classifier is evaluated later, its resultsoverwriteany previous assignments made by the BA classifier. Therefore, if a packet matches both, the MF classifier determines the final forwarding class assignment.

Junos OS 24.4 handles multicast traffic using two distinct models based on whether the source is known in advance.

Knowledge and Sources (Option A):PIM-ASM (Any Source Multicast)is designed for "many-to-many" communication where receivers join a group ($*,G$) and rely on a Rendezvous Point (RP) to discover active sources. In contrast,PIM-SSM (Source-Specific Multicast)is for "one-to-many" scenarios where receivers must alreadyknow the exact source IP($S,G$) before joining.

Protocol and RP Logic (Option D):PIM-SSMbypasses the RP entirely. It relies onIGMPv3messages from the host, which explicitly include both the source address and the group address. This allows the last-hop router to build a Shortest Path Tree (SPT) directly toward the source immediately.

Register Process (Option B):While PIM-ASM does use registers, it is the First-Hop Router (Designated Router on the source segment) that sends the register to the RP, not the receiver's DR.

RP Role (Option C):This is exactly backwards; PIM-ASMrequiresan RP for source discovery, whereas PIM-SSM does not use one at all.

To secure a Layer 2 network runningMultiple VLAN Registration Protocol (MVRP)against unauthorized VLAN propagation from rogue devices, you must control the registration state of the ports.

Forbidden Registration Mode (Option D):This mode is specifically designed to prevent an interface from participating in the MVRP exchange.

When a port is set to forbidden, it willneither register nor declare VLANs(except those statically configured on the interface).

If a rogue device sends MVRP PDUs to this interface, the distribution switch willignore those PDUs, preventing the rogue device from dynamically creating or learning VLANs through that port.

Registration Hierarchy:In Junos OS 24.4, this is configured at the [edit protocols mvrp interface registration forbidden] level.

Other Modes:normal (default) allows full participation, while restricted ignores joins for VLANs not already statically defined on the switch but still declares its own.

The exhibit shows an OSPF network where Area 1 is configured as a Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA). R5 is an Autonomous System Boundary Router (ASBR) injecting an External Route (203.0.113.0/24) into this area.

NSSA ASBR Behavior (Option D): Within an OSPF NSSA, external routes cannot be advertised as standard Type 5 LSAs because stubby areas do not support them. Instead, the ASBR (R5) advertises the external prefix using a Type 7 LSA (NSSA External LSA). This LSA is flooded throughout Area 1.

ABR Translation Behavior (Option C): When the Type 7 LSA reaches the Area Border Router (R1), the ABR is responsible for translating it into a Type 5 LSA (AS External LSA). This allows the external route to be propagated into the backbone (Area 0) and subsequently to the rest of the OSPF domain.

Incorrect Statements (A & B): Option A is incorrect because Type 7 LSAs are local to the NSSA and are never advertised into Area 0. Option B is incorrect because Type 5 LSAs are strictly prohibited within an NSSA.

To simplify VLAN management and automate the creation and pruning of VLANs across a network, Juniper utilizes theMultiple VLAN Registration Protocol (MVRP).

MVRP on Trunk Interfaces (Option C):MVRP is the IEEE 802.1ak standard that replaces the older, proprietary GVRP. It is designed to run ontrunk interfacesbetween switches.

Dynamic Creation:When a VLAN is added to one switch, MVRP advertises its existence to neighboring switches. If those switches need to reach that VLAN, they can dynamically create it in their database.

Pruning:If a switch no longer has any active ports or downstream neighbors interested in a specific VLAN, it stops advertising that VLAN on its trunks. This "prunes" the VLAN traffic from those links, saving bandwidth.

Incorrect Options:Option A and Bare incorrect because GVRP is legacy and no longer the recommended protocol for modern Junos deployments.Option Dis incorrect because MVRP is meant for inter-switch trunk links to manage the fabric, not for edge access ports where VLAN membership is usually static.

Private VLANs (PVLANs) allow for granular port isolation within a single broadcast domain. When extending a PVLAN across multiple switches (S1 to S2), the secondary VLANs (Community or Isolated) must be preserved across the trunk links.

802.1Q Tagging (Option B):For traffic from aCommunity VLAN (RND)to reach members on a different switch, the Community VLAN must have its own802.1Q VLAN tag (VLAN ID)associated with it. When a frame from a community port on S1 traverses the trunk to S2, it is tagged with this specific secondary VLAN ID. S2 receives the tagged frame, identifies it as belonging to the RND community, and forwards it to the appropriate community or promiscuous ports.

Why it fails without a tag:If the RND community is only defined locally on S1 without a global VLAN ID, the trunk port will not know how to distinguish that traffic from the Primary VLAN or other communities.

Incorrect Options:Option Ais incorrect because the community VLANmusthave a different tag than the parent (Primary) VLAN to maintain the internal PVLAN logic.Option Cis incorrect because stripping tags would lead to the traffic being merged into the native VLAN or dropped.Option Dis incorrect because RND is a community VLAN; changing it to an isolated VLAN would change its behavior (preventing communication between members of that same group).

In Junos OS, particularly in BGP-based environments like EVPN-VXLAN or MPLS, the router often needs to perform arecursive lookupto resolve the BGP next-hop of a route.

Next-Hop Resolution (Option C):When an EVPN route (found in default-switch.evpn.0) is received, the protocol next-hop is typically the loopback IP of the remote VTEP. To actually forward traffic, the switch must know how to reach that loopback IP.

Theinet.3table is the default table in Junos used to store egress interface information for BGP next-hops.

While inet.0 handles standard unicast routing, inet.3 is specifically consulted for resolving the path toward BGP peers. In an EVPN context, this ensures that the VXLAN tunnel endpoint is reachable and properly resolved through the underlay.

Other Tables:*inet.2 (Option A)is used for Multicast RPF checks.

default-switch.evpn.0 (Option B)stores the EVPN routes themselves (MAC/IP), but it is thesourceof the lookup, not the table where the recursive resolution occurs.

vxlan.inet (Option D)is an internal table used to track active VXLAN tunnels but is not the primary table for recursive BGP next-hop validation.

In an end-to-end CoS (Class of Service) design, there is a clear distinction betweenclassificationat the ingress andrewrite rulesat the egress.

The Problem:Your edge devices are successfully classifying traffic (assigning packets to internal forwarding classes). However, the core devices—which useBA (Behavior Aggregate) classifiers—are not classifying correctly. BA classifiers look at the bits in the packet header (like DSCP or 802.1p) to determine priority.

The Missing Link (Option C):When a packet leaves the edge device, its internal forwarding class and loss priority must be "written" back into the packet header so that the next-hop (the core device) can see it. By default, Junos may not preserve or set these bits correctly on egress. You must applyrewrite ruleson the edge switches' egress interfaces facing the core. These rules ensure the DSCP values in the headers match the forwarding class determined by the edge's MF classifier, allowing the core's BA classifier to function properly.

Other Options:Option A(policer) handles rate limiting, not classification.Option Bis incorrect because core devices often have different hardware or scaling needs than edge switches, and standard BA configuration is preferred over templates in the core.Option Dis incorrect because MF classifiers are standard for edge devices where deep packet inspection is needed to identify traffic types.

When 802.1X server fail fallback is enabled with the vlan-name feature, the switch provides a specific survival mechanism for both existing and new sessions when the RADIUS server becomes unreachable.

Existing Clients (Statement B): Clients that have already successfully authenticated are unaffected by the server's unavailability in the short term. They maintain their current network access until their specific re-authentication timer expires. Only then will the switch attempt to contact the server again and trigger the fallback action if the server remains down.

New Clients (Statement D): For any new device attempting to connect while the RADIUS server is down, the switch cannot perform a standard authentication. Under the vlan-name fallback configuration, these new clients are automatically placed into the specified fallback VLAN and granted access based on the local policy defined for that VLAN.

Why others are incorrect: Statement A is incorrect because disconnecting active users would cause unnecessary service disruption. Statement C is incorrect because new clients cannot "request" a VLAN during the 802.1X handshake; the switch assigns it based on the fallback configuration.