Microsoft GH-900 Dumps

GitHub Projects is a newer, more powerful version of project management within GitHub, offering enhanced features over the classic version.

Multiple Layout Views:

Option A is correct because GitHub Projects supports multiple views, such as board, table, and timeline views, allowing users to visualize their work in different ways according to their needs.

Insights:

Option B is correct because GitHub Projects provides insights and analytics, enabling teams to track progress and make data-driven decisions.

Incorrect Options:

Option C is incorrect because while GitHub Copilot is a tool for code suggestions, it is not directly integrated with GitHub Projects as a feature.

Option D is incorrect because both GitHub Projects and GitHub Projects Classic can be connected to third-party tools, so it is not an exclusive advantage of the newer GitHub Projects.

GitHub Pages is a feature provided by GitHub that allows you to create webpages hosted and published through GitHub repositories. It is commonly used for hosting project documentation, personal websites, or blogs directly from a GitHub repository. It integrates seamlessly with the repository, making it easy to deploy and manage website content.

=================

After 30 minutes of inactivity, a GitHub Codespace will time out. This is designed to conserve resources when the Codespace is not being actively used. The session will be paused, and you'll need to reconnect to resume your work. However, the Codespace is not deleted, and any unsaved changes might not be lost but should be committed or saved to prevent data loss.

=================

When using GitHub Codespaces, you can customize several aspects of the development environment:

Shell: You can choose the default shell to be used in the Codespace, such as Bash, Zsh, or PowerShell.

Name: Users can customize the name of their Codespace for easier identification.

Default editor: You can choose which editor to use within the Codespace, such as Visual Studio Code or others that may be supported.

Branch protections and the operating system are not customizable for an individual Codespace within GitHub, making the options Shell, Name, and Default editor the correct answers.

=================

To locate an existing GitHub Action provided by a GitHub-approved vendor, you can use the following methods:

Verification Badge:

Option C is correct because actions provided by GitHub-approved vendors will typically have a verification badge. This badge indicates that the action is from a trusted source, giving users confidence in its security and reliability.

Search the GitHub Marketplace:

Option F is correct because GitHub Marketplace is the official location to find and install actions, including those provided by third-party vendors. You can search for actions by the vendor's name to find the specific one you need.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is not necessary to locate an existing action; creating a workflow file is for implementing the action, not locating it.

Option B is incorrect because searching the vendor’s website for a github.yaml index is not a standard practice for finding actions.

Option D is incorrect because installing a GitHub App is unrelated to finding an existing action.

Option E is incorrect because adding a vendor as an allowed Actions Source is a configuration step for using the action, not for locating it.

GitHub provides repository admins with a feature called "Insights" where they can view various pre-built visualizations and analytics related to the repository.

Insights:

Option C is correct because the "Insights" tab in a GitHub repository offers various pre-built visualizations, including contributions, traffic, code frequency, dependency graphs, and more. This helps admins and maintainers track the project's activity and health.

Other Options:

Option A (Settings) is incorrect because the Settings tab is where you configure repository settings, permissions, and integrations, but it does not provide visualizations of repository data.

Option B (Issues) is incorrect because the Issues tab is used for tracking bugs, enhancements, and other tasks but does not provide data visualizations.

Option D (Charts) is incorrect as there is no "Charts" tab or section in GitHub. The correct location for data visualizations is under "Insights."

As mentioned in the answer to Question no. 66, GitHub Actions workflows can reference actions from a variety of sources:

Any Public Repository:

Option A is correct. Actions can be sourced from any public GitHub repository.

The Same Repository as Your Workflow File:

Option B is correct. Actions within the same repository as the workflow file can be referenced directly.

A Published Docker Container Image on Docker Hub:

Option E is correct. Workflows can also use actions provided as Docker container images from Docker Hub.

Incorrect Options:

Option C and D are not relevant for directly referencing actions in workflows.

A gist on GitHub is essentially a Git repository, albeit a simplified one, designed for sharing snippets of code, notes, or other text content. Gists support version control and can be public or secret.

Gist as a Git Repository:

Option B is correct because each gist is a Git repository, meaning you can clone it, commit changes, and even fork it, just like any other Git repository.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is incorrect because a gist is not an app; it’s a feature of GitHub that provides a simplified repository.

Option C is incorrect because while a gist may contain Markdown documents, it is fundamentally a repository that can hold various file types.

Option D is incorrect because GitHub Pages is a separate service for hosting websites, not related to gists.

Forking a repository on GitHub is a common practice, especially when contributing to open-source projects or when you want to build on existing work. Here are the two main reasons for forking a repository:

B. To propose changes to the base repository:

One of the primary reasons for forking a repository is to make changes or improvements that you can later propose to the original repository (often called the "upstream" repository). This is typically done through a pull request. By forking the repository, you get your own copy of the project where you can freely experiment, make changes, and then propose those changes back to the original project.

C. To create a new repository based on an existing one:

Forking is also used to create a new repository that is a copy of an existing one. This allows you to work on the project independently of the original repository, effectively creating a new direction for the project or using it as a starting point for a different purpose. This is particularly useful for customization, experimentation, or when you want to build something different while still leveraging the existing codebase.

Explanation of Other Options:

A. To create an issue or open a discussion:

This is incorrect because creating an issue or opening a discussion can be done directly on the original repository without needing to fork it. Forking is unnecessary for these actions.

D. To create a new branch to develop a new feature:

While creating a new branch is related to development, it does not require a fork. Branches are typically created within the same repository to work on new features. Forking is used when you need an entirely separate copy of the repository.

Given this information, the correct answers are B and C.

GitHub provides a powerful search syntax to filter and find specific issues across repositories in an organization.

Search Query Syntax:

Option A is correct because the query org:Avocado is:issue label:guacamole "404 error" is the best way to search for all issues within the "Avocado" organization that contain the text "404 error" and are labeled with "guacamole". This query is precise and leverages GitHub’s advanced search capabilities.

Incorrect Options:

Option B is incorrect because it requires manual filtering in a specific repository rather than searching across the entire organization.

Option C is incorrect because selecting "Issues" in the filter by section is redundant when using the query is:issue.

Option D is incorrect because accessing organization settings to look for repository labels is not relevant to searching for issues.

Forking a gist is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist while maintaining the history of the original gist. When you fork a gist, you create a new gist in your own account that retains a link to the original, allowing you to track changes and contribute back if desired.

Forking a Gist:

Option A is correct because forking is a straightforward way to create your own copy of another user's gist while preserving the history and making it easy to track updates.

Incorrect Options:

Option B is incorrect because creating a new gist and copying the content would not preserve the history or link back to the original gist.

Option C is incorrect because cloning is typically associated with repositories, not gists, and is more complex than forking for this purpose.

Option D is incorrect because requesting to be added to the existing gist is not a standard GitHub feature.

For private repositories on GitHub, the Wiki is accessible to anyone who has Read access to the repository. This means that if you can view the code and files in the repository, you can also view its Wiki. This makes Wikis a useful tool for documenting projects in a way that is available to all collaborators without requiring special permissions beyond those needed to access the repository itself.

=================

In GitHub, labels are used to categorize issues and pull requests, and certain default labels are provided to help manage tasks:

Help Wanted Label:

Option C is correct. The "Help wanted" label is used to indicate that the maintainer of the repository needs assistance on a particular issue or pull request. This label helps in attracting contributors who might be interested in helping with specific tasks.

Other Options:

Option A ("Enhancement") is incorrect because it indicates a request for a new feature or improvement rather than a call for help.

Option B ("Question") is incorrect because it is used to flag issues or pull requests that seek clarification or additional information, not necessarily requiring assistance.

Option D ("Documentation") is incorrect because it labels issues or PRs related to documentation, not for seeking help.

To highlight a post at the top of the Discussions page on GitHub, you can Pin the discussion. Pinning a discussion ensures it remains prominently visible at the top of the list, making it easier for others to find and participate in that discussion. This is particularly useful for important announcements or frequently referenced topics.

=================

To contribute to a GitHub repository, a user typically needs to be able to create branches, push changes, and open pull requests. These actions require Write access, which is the minimum level of access needed to contribute code directly to a repository.

Write Access:

Option D is correct because "Write" access allows users to contribute to the repository by pushing changes, creating branches, and opening pull requests. This is the minimum required access level for contributing code.

Incorrect Options:

Option A (Read) is incorrect because "Read" access only allows viewing the repository, not making changes.

Option B (Triage) is incorrect because while Triage access allows managing issues and pull requests, it does not allow pushing code.

Option C (Maintain) is incorrect because "Maintain" access includes additional permissions beyond those needed for basic contributions, such as managing repository settings.

GitHub is a cloud-based platform that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers tools for collaboration, project management, and security to create a safe and productive environment for developers.

GitHub Overview:

Option B is correct because GitHub is primarily known as a cloud-based hosting service for Git repositories, offering a collaborative environment where developers can work together on projects, manage version control, and implement security practices.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is incorrect because GitHub is not proprietary in the sense of being closed off from version control standards; it is widely recognized as an open platform for collaboration.

Option C is incorrect because, while GitHub is accessible to new developers, it is designed for developers of all skill levels and not specifically tailored for beginners.

Option D is incorrect because GitHub is not a centralized version control system; it supports Git, which is distributed.

GitHub supports various syntax formats that align with Markdown and HTML conventions. Here's a breakdown of the provided options:

Comment Syntax:

Option C is correct. The syntax is used in Markdown files to insert comments. These comments will not be rendered in the final output, making them useful for adding notes or instructions within the code or documentation.

Incorrect Options:

Option A (* This is a heading) is incorrect because an asterisk (*) denotes an unordered list item, not a heading. A heading in Markdown is typically created with one or more hash symbols (#).

Option B (This is a link) is incorrect because this is plain text and not the syntax for creating a link. The correct syntax would be [This is a link](URL).

Option D (This is bolded text) is incorrect because this is plain text, not the correct Markdown syntax for bold text, which should be **This is bolded text** or __This is bolded text__.

Option E (1. This is an ordered list) is incorrect as it does represent an ordered list item, but it was not the syntax format asked about in the question. The question specifically focuses on matching associated text with syntax, where only the comment option is correct.

GitHub provides several pre-defined repository roles that determine the level of access and permissions a user has within a repository. The roles that are included by default are:

Triage: Allows users to manage issues and pull requests without write access to the code.

Maintain: Provides more extensive access, including managing settings, but without full administrative control.

Write: Grants permission to push changes and manage issues and pull requests.

Roles like "Security" and "Delete" are not standard pre-defined roles, and "View" is generally referred to as "Read" in GitHub's permission structure.

=================

Two recommended ways to improve the discoverability of a repository on GitHub are:

B. Create a README file describing the repository: A well-written README file provides essential information about the project, such as what it does, how to use it, and how to contribute. This is often the first thing potential users or contributors will see, making it critical for discoverability.

D. Add topics to classify the repository: Adding topics to your repository helps classify it under specific categories, making it easier for others to find it through GitHub’s search and exploration features. Topics act like tags, helping to connect your project with users interested in similar subjects.

Registering a repository with GitHub search and adding labels are not applicable actions for improving discoverability in the broader sense.

=================

Pull requests are created to propose changes from one branch to another. These branches must be different; otherwise, there would be no changes to propose. Typically, pull requests are made from a feature or topic branch to a main branch (such as main or master), allowing for code review and integration before the changes are merged.

=================

GitHub Flow is a simple, yet powerful, branching strategy that is widely used in modern software development. It emphasizes collaboration and flexibility.

GitHub Flow:

Option C is correct because GitHub Flow is a lightweight workflow designed for safe experimentation and collaboration. It involves creating branches for new features or fixes, opening pull requests for review, and merging changes back into the main branch after approval.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is incorrect because GitHub Flow uses a single main branch, not multiple primary branches.

Option B is incorrect because GitHub Flow is not specifically designed around releases; it is more focused on continuous development and integration.

Option D is incorrect because GitHub Flow is not strict or linear; it encourages branching and pull requests rather than direct changes on the main branch.

The terms Alpha and Beta are often used in software development to describe different stages of feature testing and release.

Alpha Features:

Option A is correct because Alpha features are typically in the early stages of development and are not available to the public. They are usually tested internally or by a limited audience.

Incorrect Options:

Option B is incorrect because Alpha features are often undocumented as they are in the early development phase.

Option C is incorrect because Alpha and Beta features usually do not offer Service Level Agreements (SLAs) due to their experimental nature.

Option D is incorrect because Beta features might offer limited support, but it is not guaranteed, especially compared to fully released features.