National Payroll Institute PF1 Dumps

“Net taxable income” for payroll withholding purposes is the amount of income on which income tax is calculated for the pay period. It generally starts with the employee’s gross taxable earnings for the period (regular wages plus any taxable benefits/allowances that must be included in income), then subtracts only those deductions that are deductible for tax at source (for example, certain registered pension plan contributions, union dues, etc., if applicable). A cash taxable benefit is treated like additional remuneration and is included in taxable income. (canada.ca)

Here, Anthony’s weekly taxable earnings are:

$750.00 wages + $25.00 cash taxable benefit = $775.00.

Being exempt from CPP contributions affects whether CPP is deducted, but CPP is not a “net taxable income” subtraction in this question (and in any case, no CPP is being deducted). The question also does not mention any other tax-deductible payroll deductions (like RPP contributions), so there is nothing to subtract from taxable earnings.

Therefore, Anthony’s net taxable income for the week is $775.00.

In Quebec, employees must complete a Quebec-specific source deductions form so the employer can calculate Québec income tax to withhold. Revenu Québec identifies Form TP-1015.3-V (Source Deductions Return) as the form employees complete and provide to their employer/payer for this purpose. It is part of the onboarding/payroll setup process in Quebec and is used to determine personal tax credits and any additional withholding instructions for Québec provincial income tax.

The other options are not the standard Quebec source deductions return for new employees: T1213 is a CRA form used to request a reduction in tax deductions at source (federal), TD1-AB is a provincial TD1 for Alberta (not Quebec), and T2222 is not the Quebec source deductions return. From a payroll communication standpoint, the employer should request both the applicable federal TD1 and the Quebec TP-1015.3-V, then retain them on file to support accurate withholding calculations.

Regular salary, vacation pay, and commissions are generally treated as income from employment because they are amounts paid for services performed during employment. In contrast, what many people call “severance pay” is often classified by the CRA as a retiring allowance—an amount paid when or after an employee retires or loses their job, in recognition of long service or for the loss of employment.

This distinction matters in payroll because a retiring allowance has its own rules for withholding and potential RRSP/RPP transfer eligibility, and it is not treated the same way as normal employment income earned while actively employed. CRA technical guidance also draws lines between amounts that are employment income versus retiring allowance depending on the nature/timing of the payment.

So, among the options listed, severance pay (when it is a retiring allowance) is the one that is not considered income from employment in the way salary/vacation pay/commissions are.

Bonuses and incentives are treated as taxable remuneration, so they are generally subject to the same core statutory deductions as regular earnings: CPP/QPP, EI, and income tax (and in Quebec, QPIP also applies when the remuneration is subject to EI). The CRA specifically notes that you must deduct EI premiums from bonuses/retroactive pay (up to the annual maximum), and the CRA’s guidance for bonuses/irregular amounts uses tools (PDOC/formulas) that calculate CPP contributions, EI premiums, and income tax on these payments.

In Quebec payroll, remuneration that is subject to EI premiums is generally also subject to QPIP premiums, so bonuses/incentives that are EI-insurable are typically QPIP-insurable as well.

In the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, there is also a statutory territorial payroll tax that employers must withhold/remit where applicable, and the NWT guidance explicitly lists bonuses as part of employment income subject to payroll tax.

In Block 6 (Pay period type), Service Canada instructs employers to enter the employee’s actual pay period type—one of the standard types such as weekly, biweekly, semi-monthly, monthly, or 13 pay periods a year.

Service Canada identifies a special rule only for employees “paid solely on commission or on salary plus irregularly paid commission”: in those cases, the employer must use a weekly pay period and average earnings using the weekly averaging formula.

Because this question specifies salary plus regularly paid commission (not irregularly paid commission), the “special situation” rule does not apply. Therefore, you enter the pay period type that matches the employer’s normal payroll cycle for that employee (for example, weekly, biweekly, semi-monthly, monthly, etc.).

CRA requires separating a retiring allowance into an eligible and non-eligible portion. The eligible portion is the maximum that can be transferred to an RRSP/RPP under the special rules (without using regular RRSP room). The formula is: $2,000 for each year (or part-year) of service before 1996, plus an additional $1,500 for each year (or part-year) before 1989 in which the employee had no employer pension/DPSP benefit vested at the time of payment (or previously paid).

Rosa worked from 1983 to 1995 (inclusive) for pre-1996 service: 13 years × $2,000 = $26,000.

For the extra pre-1989 amount: she joined the pension plan in 1986 and was fully vested when paid the retiring allowance in 2015, so 1986–1988 do not qualify for the extra $1,500. However, 1983–1985 were years before 1989 when she had no vested employer pension benefit, so 3 years × $1,500 = $4,500.

Eligible portion = $26,000 + $4,500 = $30,500.

Non-eligible portion = $62,500 − $30,500 = $32,000.

A strong hire-authorization/onboarding checklist ensures payroll and HR collect documents needed to pay the employee accurately and enroll them in required programs. Abenefit enrollment formis a practical, common checklist item because many employers offer benefit plans that require employee elections (for example, health/dental coverage levels, beneficiary information, dependent details, etc.). Indeed’s Canadian onboarding guidance explicitly notes employers often collectbenefits enrollmentpaperwork as part of essential new employee forms and onboarding checklists.

By contrast, aT1213(Request to Reduce Tax Deductions at Source) is not routinely required for all hires; it is only used when an employee applies for CRA authorization to reduce tax withheld. A “clearance certificate” is not a standard Canada-wide payroll onboarding requirement for typical employment relationships. Therefore, “All of the above” is not correct.

Selectingbenefit enrollment formbest matches the purpose of a hiring authorization checklist: ensuring all employment setup steps are completed (pay setup, statutory forms, and benefits enrollment where offered) so payroll deductions and coverage are handled correctly from the start.

The special$1,500transfer eligibility connected to retiring allowances is based specifically onyears (or part-years) of service before 1989where the employee hadno vested employer pension/DPSP benefitsfor those years. CRA explains that, in addition to the $2,000-per-year pre-1996 rule, you can also transfer an additional$1,500 for each year or part-year before 1989that meets the vesting condition.

Phan’s employment began in1992, which isafter 1989. Because he haszeroservice before 1989, there arenoyears that can qualify for the $1,500 portion—regardless of whether he belonged to a pension plan.

Therefore, the number of eligible years for the$1,500component is0(option A). Payroll must base this calculation on actual service dates, including any related-employer service if applicable, but here the start date alone makes the $1,500 portion ineligible.

The CRA form used to adjust payroll income tax withholdings at source for employees who earn commission income and have commission expenses is Form TD1X – Statement of Commission Income and Expenses for Payroll Tax Deductions. The CRA explains that an employee completes TD1X if they receive commission income (or salary plus commission) and want the employer to adjust tax deductions to take commission expenses into account.

This is different from:

TD1, which is the Personal Tax Credits Return used to claim basic/personal credits and determine standard withholding (not commission-expense adjustments).

T777, which is used to claim employment expenses on the employee’s personal tax return (not to reduce payroll withholding at source).

TP-1015.R.13.1-V, which is a Quebec form used to request a reduction of Quebec income tax withholding in specific situations (not the CRA commission-expense at-source form).

Operationally, payroll should keep the TD1X on file and apply it to income tax withholding calculations until the employee updates or replaces it.

Legislated wages in lieu of notice are treated as pensionable employment earnings for CPP purposes, so they are included with the employee’s final regular pay when calculating CPP deductions (assuming no CPP exemption applies).

Step 1: Determine total pensionable earnings for the week:

$7,760.00 + $875.00 = $8,635.00.

Step 2: Subtract the CPP basic exemption (Year’s Basic Exemption is $3,500 annually). For a weekly payroll, the basic exemption is prorated:

$3,500 ÷ 52 = $67.31.

CPP contributory earnings for the week:

$8,635.00 − $67.31 = $8,567.69.

Step 3: Apply the 2026 CPP employee contribution rate of 5.95% (base CPP). The question states the annual maximum will not be exceeded, so no capping is required in this calculation.

CPP contribution:

$8,567.69 × 5.95% = $509.7777…, rounded to $509.78.

CRA’s automobile benefit calculations require multiple data points because there are usuallytwo components: thestandby charge(vehicle availability) and theoperating expense benefit(personal driving where the employer pays operating costs). CRA’s guidance on employer-provided automobiles explains that standby charge calculations use the automobile’scost (capital cost) including applicable taxesand the time the vehicle wasavailableto the employee, while the reduced standby charge and operating benefit depend onkilometres drivenand the split betweenbusiness and personal use.

To determine whether areduced standby chargeapplies, you need availability plusbusiness-use requirements(which are evidenced through total/business kilometres). To calculate the operating expense benefit, you needpersonal kilometres(often derived from total kilometres minus business kilometres) or detailed personal km directly.

Therefore, the complete and correct set of required inputs is:capital cost (with sales tax), availability, total kilometres, business kilometres, and personal kilometres—which is optionD.

Piecework (also called piece-rate pay) is a pay method where an employee’s earnings are determined by output—they are paid a set amount per unit produced or completed, rather than by hours worked or a fixed salary. This aligns directly with option C. A time-based hourly/daily wage (option A) is a different earnings method, and a fixed pay-per-period arrangement (option B) describes salary. Therefore, “all of the above” is incorrect because these are three distinct compensation structures.

In payroll calculations, piecework earnings are typically calculated as: piece rate × number of units produced in the pay period. Employers still have to ensure compliance with employment standards, such as minimum wage and overtime rules, even where piecework is used. A Canadian payroll educational reference defines piecework as payment for each unit produced “regardless of the amount of time taken.”

Regular earnings for an hourly employee are calculated as hourly rate × hours worked. Because “bi-weekly” means two weeks of work paid together, you calculate one week’s regular earnings and then multiply by two (assuming the hours are the same each week and there is no overtime premium indicated).

Step 1: Weekly regular earnings:

$10.10 × 37.5 hours = $10.10 × 37 + $10.10 × 0.5

= $373.70 + $5.05

= $378.75.

Step 2: Bi-weekly regular earnings (2 weeks):

$378.75 × 2 = $757.50.

So Matt’s regular bi-weekly earnings are $757.50.

In payroll documentation, “regular earnings” are the employee’s base wages before statutory deductions (CPP/QPP, EI, income tax) and before other deductions, and they exclude any separately calculated earnings like overtime premiums or taxable benefits unless stated. This approach (rate × hours, then adjust for pay period) is the standard method used to compute gross/regular pay for hourly employees before moving on to deductions and net pay.

Block 11 on the ROE is “Last day for which paid.” Service Canada instructs employers to enter the last day for which the employee received insurable earnings. This date usually coincides with the last day of work, unless the employee continues to receive insurable earnings after the last day worked (for example, paid leave like vacation/sick leave or salary continuance).

In Tanya’s case, she gave notice on April 2, but her resignation is effective April 27. There’s no information indicating paid leave after April 27 or salary continuance. So Block 11 should be April 27 (the last day she worked/received insurable earnings).

The question also mentions the pay period ending April 28—that date belongs in Block 12 (Final pay period ending date), which is the end date of the final pay period that includes the Block 11 date, and is often different from Block 11.

An expense reimbursement is a repayment to an employee for business costs they already paid personally (for example, meals, mileage, supplies), typically supported by receipts or an expense report. CRA’s guidance explains that a reimbursement is a payment made to repay amounts the employee spent while conducting the employer’s business, and that a reasonable reimbursement is generally not included in the employee’s income.

That’s why reimbursements are generally not part of “earnings” for payroll calculations—they are not compensation for work performed; they are repayment of a business expense. This differs from an allowance, which is usually a fixed amount paid without requiring receipts; allowances are often taxable unless a specific CRA exception applies.

So the correct term for “dollar amounts paid to cover job expenses incurred, but not considered earnings” is expense reimbursements (option D). Payroll best practice is to ensure reimbursements are properly documented and reasonable to support non-taxable treatment.

Step 1 — Block 6

Bi-weekly

Step 2 — Block 8

435837159

Step 3 — Block 10

September 19, 2007 → 19092007

Step 4 — Block 11

October 28, 2019 → 28102019

Step 5 — Block 12

October 28, 2019 → 28102019

Step 6 — Block 15A (Total insurable hours)

80.00 × 27 = 2160

Block 15A = 2160

Step 7 — Block 15B (Total insurable earnings)

$1,884.62 × 27 = $50,884.74

Block 15B = 50,884.74

Step 8 — Block 17A (Vacation pay)

$52,050.00 × 6% = $3,123.00

Block 17A = 3,123.00

Step 9 — Block 17C (Pay in lieu of notice)

Weekly earnings = $1,884.62 ÷ 2 = $942.31

Pay in lieu = $942.31 × 8 = $7,538.48

Block 17C (Pay in lieu of notice) = 7,538.48

Step 10 — Block 17C (Severance)

Severance = $942.31 × 10 = $9,423.10

Block 17C (Severance) = 9,423.10

On the ROE, separation payments are reported in Block 17. Service Canada explains that Block 17C – Other monies is used to record “any other payments or benefits…paid…because of the separation,” whether or not they are insurable.

The ROE Guide specifically lists “Severance pay” as a type of separation money to enter in Block 17C (“Enter ‘Severance pay’ and the amount”).

Crucially, Block 15B and Block 15C are for insurable earnings totals/by pay period. The ROE Guide notes that some amounts reported in Block 17 (like vacation pay) are insurable and must be added into Blocks 15B/15C; however, retirement leave credits/retiring allowances (a form of severance-type payment) are not insurable and are not added to Blocks 15B/15C even though they are recorded in Block 17C.

So, severance is reported in Block 17C only.

The CRA defines a retiring allowance (also called severance pay) as an amount paid to an employee when or after they retire or lose their job, in recognition of long service or for the loss of office or employment. This matches option A.

The other options are specifically not retiring allowances under CRA guidance. The CRA states a retiring allowance does not include salary, wages, bonuses, or overtime, which rules out bonus or incentive pay and accumulated overtime. The CRA also states it does not include payments for accumulated vacation leave not taken before retirement, which rules out vacation pay.

This classification matters in payroll because retiring allowances have distinct rules: for example, they are not subject to CPP or EI deductions, and part of a retiring allowance may be eligible for direct transfer to an RRSP/RPP under special rules (based on pre-1996 service).

Service Canada’s ROE guidance states that an employer must issue an ROE each time an employee experiences an interruption of earnings and when Service Canada requests one. This makes option A true.

For paper ROEs, the ROE guide is explicit about deadlines: you must issue a paper ROE within 5 calendar days of (1) the first day of an interruption of earnings, or (2) the day the employer becomes aware that an interruption of earnings has occurred. This confirms option B.

An interruption of earnings generally occurs under the 7-day rule—when an employee has had or is anticipated to have 7 consecutive calendar days with no work and no insurable earnings from the employer. That’s why option C is also true: once the employer becomes aware the 7-day threshold is met (or will be met), the ROE requirement is triggered, and the paper ROE must be issued within the time limit above.

The Northern residents deductions (often referred to as the “prescribed zone” deduction on the personal tax return) are not limited to the three territories. While all places in Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories are in a prescribed northern zone (Zone A), the rules also designate prescribed northern and intermediate zones in parts of several provinces (for example, parts of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, and others).

The governing framework is in the Income Tax Regulations, which define prescribed zones using geographic descriptions (latitudes/longitudes) covering areas in multiple provinces, as well as the territories.

From a payroll/HR communications perspective, the key is that this deduction is generally claimed by the individual on their income tax return (it does not change the employer’s province-of-employment withholding rules). Employees who believe they qualify should verify their community’s zone status using CRA’s prescribed zone lists before claiming the deduction.

For CRA automobile benefit purposes (standby charge on an employer-owned automobile), the “cost” used is the capital cost, which includes more than just the sticker price. CRA guidance states the cost includes the trade-in amount (if applicable), additions, and GST/HST and PST as part of the cost base used in the standby charge calculation.

Option D is the best match because it includes vehicle options/accessories, sales taxes, and additions that add to depreciation value. Importantly, CRA also notes that certain specialized equipment added to meet the requirements of a disabled person or employment (examples include heavy-duty suspension and power winches) is not considered part of the automobile’s cost for standby charge purposes. This directly rules out options A and C, since they treat specialized equipment as part of capital cost. Option B is incorrect because CRA includes sales taxes (GST/HST and PST) in the cost base.