Oracle 1z0-1080-25 Dumps

In Oracle Planning 2024’s Workforce module, certain configuration tasks are mandatory to enable basic functionality, while others are optional depending on the organization’s needs. The task that is not mandatory is:

A. Employee Type: Incorrect. Defining Employee Type (e.g., full-time, part-time) is mandatory because it establishes the categories of employees to be planned, forming the foundation of workforce data.

B. Planning and Forecast Preparation: Incorrect. This task is mandatory as it sets up the planning periods, scenarios, and versions, which are essential for Workforce to function within the broader Planning application.

C. Benefits and Taxes: Correct. Configuring Benefits and Taxes is optional. While Workforce provides predefined options to calculate benefits (e.g., health insurance) and taxes (e.g., payroll taxes), organizations can choose not to configure these if they do not need detailed compensation planning beyond salaries.

D. Workforce Assumptions: Incorrect. Workforce Assumptions (e.g., hiring rates, salary increases) are mandatory to drive calculations and populate employee data over time.

The Oracle documentation specifies that while Benefits and Taxes enhance Workforce planning, they are not required for core functionality, making C the non-mandatory task.

When designing a report in Reports for Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud and encountering an error (indicated by a red bar above the report header), the issue often stems from report object configuration. The two possible causes are:

A. The report name is blank when you use a text function to display the name: Incorrect. A blank report name might cause display issues, but it’s not a common cause of a report object error flagged by a red bar—errors typically relate to objects or data sources, not naming.

B. The report object overlaps with another report object: Correct. Overlapping objects (e.g., grids, charts) can cause rendering or validation errors in Report Designer, triggering an error indicator like a red bar due to layout conflicts.

C. The data source connection for the report is no longer valid: Correct. If the data source (e.g., a cube or grid definition) becomes invalid (e.g., deleted, renamed, or inaccessible), the report cannot retrieve data, resulting in an error marked by a red bar.

D. The size of the inserted graphic is too large: Incorrect. While large graphics might affect performance or formatting, they do not typically cause a report object error flagged by a red bar—size issues are more likely to impact display than functionality.

The Oracle documentation identifies B (object overlap) and C (invalid data source) as frequent causes of errors in Report Designer, making them the correct answers.

In Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation, form validation rules ensure data integrity and usability by defining how forms are validated when loaded or saved. The platform supports multiple validation options tailored to performance, security, and user access, as outlined below:

A. Validate only for cells and pages to which a user has access: This option restricts validation to the data cells and form pages that the logged-in user has permission to view or edit, based on security settings. It enhances performance by limiting the validation scope and ensures users only interact with relevant data.

C. Validate for all page combinations and all existing or potential blocks: This comprehensive validation option checks all possible page combinations and data blocks (both existing and potential) within the form. It is useful for ensuring complete data consistency across the application, though it may impact performance due to its extensive scope.

E. Validate only for pages with existing blocks: This option limits validation to pages that already contain data blocks, ignoring potential blocks that could be created. It strikes a balance between performance and thoroughness, focusing validation efforts on existing data.

B. Validate rules as Service Administrator, regardless of logged-in user, when the form is loaded or saved: While Service Administrators have elevated privileges, this is not a distinct form validation rule option. Validation rules are applied based on form settings and user access, not specifically tied to the Service Administrator role overriding the logged-in user’s context.

D. Validate only for users with access to this form: This option overlaps with A but is less precise. Validation is tied to cell-level and page-level access rather than a broad "users with access to this form" criterion, making A the more accurate choice per Oracle’s terminology.

References

Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud Documentation: "Designing Forms – Validation Rules" (docs.oracle.com, updated 2024). Describes validation options including "cells and pages a user has access to," "all page combinations and blocks," and "pages with existing blocks."

Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: Lists the three supported validation options (A, C, E) under form design and validation settings, aligning with security and performance optimization features.

In Oracle Planning 2024’s Workforce module, Merit-Based Planning involves planning salary increases or adjustments based on employee performance (merit). To perform this, you need workforce data at a level of granularity that includes individual employee details. The two levels required are:

A. Merit: Incorrect. "Merit" is not a granularity level; it’s a planning concept or assumption applied to employee data, not a structural level of detail.

B. Employee and Job: Correct. This level combines employee-specific data (e.g., individual identity) with job-specific data (e.g., role, grade), enabling merit-based adjustments tailored to both the person and their position.

C. Job: Incorrect. Job-level granularity (e.g., aggregated data for a role) lacks individual employee details, which are necessary for merit-based planning.

D. Employee: Correct. Employee-level granularity provides the individual data (e.g., current salary, performance rating) needed to calculate merit increases for specific employees.

Merit-Based Planning requires at least Employee-level detail, and often Employee and Job for more precise planning (e.g., tying merit to job roles or grades). The Oracle documentation confirms these as the key granularity levels for this functionality, making B and D the correct answers.

In Oracle Planning 2024, pushing data between cubes (e.g., from one cube to another within the same application) can be accomplished using specific tools. The two methods that facilitate this are:

A. Data Integration: Incorrect. Data Integration is used to import data from external sources (e.g., files, other systems) into Planning, not to push data between cubes within the same application.

B. Data Maps: Correct. Data Maps allow you to define mappings and push data between cubes (or applications) using Smart Push or manual execution. This is a primary method for intra-application data movement.

C. Copy Data: Correct. The Copy Data feature enables administrators to copy data from one cube to another within the same Planning application, specifying dimensions and members to transfer.

D. Import Data: Incorrect. Import Data is designed to bring external data into a cube from a file, not to push data between existing cubes.

Both Data Maps (with Smart Push for real-time updates) and Copy Data (for batch-style transfers) are explicitly supported for moving data between cubes, as per Oracle’s documentation, making B and C the correct answers.

To set up weekly planning for 18 continuous months in Oracle Planning 2024’s Financials module, specific options must be selected when initially enabling features via the Configure card. The three required options are:

A. Time Frame Granularity: Incorrect. This is not a specific option in the Enable Features page; granularity (e.g., weeks) is controlled by Weekly Planning, not a separate setting.

B. Rolling Forecast: Correct. Enabling Rolling Forecast allows planning over a continuous 18-month horizon, dynamically updating as time progresses, which aligns with the requirement for ongoing weekly planning.

C. Weeks to Months Mapping: Correct. This option defines how weekly data rolls up into monthly totals, essential for reporting and analysis over the 18-month period in a weekly planning setup.

D. Weekly Planning: Correct. Enabling Weekly Planning sets the periodicity to weeks instead of months, allowing budgeting and forecasting at a weekly level for the 18 months.

E. Custom Periods: Incorrect. Custom Periods allow defining non-standard time periods, but they are not required for weekly planning over 18 months—Weekly Planning and standard calendar setups suffice.

The Oracle documentation confirms that Rolling Forecast, Weeks to Months Mapping, and Weekly Planning are the key features to enable for weekly planning over an extended horizon like 18 months, making B, C, and D the correct answers.

In Oracle Planning 2024, a Pipeline is a feature that allows administrators to define and automate a sequence of jobs (e.g., data imports, metadata updates, calculations) as a single, coordinated process. Pipelines streamline the management of metadata and data by executing multiple tasks in a specified order, ensuring dependencies are met, and providing a repeatable workflow for maintaining the Planning application.

A. Develop pipelines to guide you through the Planning process: Incorrect. Pipelines are not a planning guide; they are an automation tool for executing jobs, not a process framework.

B. Use pipelines as a visible, automated, and repeatable system of record for running an application: Incorrect. While pipelines are automated and repeatable, they are not a "system of record" for running the entire application—they focus on specific job sequences.

C. Use pipelines to coordinate the running of a series of jobs as a single process: Correct. This aligns with the Oracle definition of pipelines, which orchestrate multiple jobs (e.g., import data, refresh database) into one executable process.

D. Quickly drill into data slices that are important to you with pipelines: Incorrect. Pipelines are not designed for data analysis or drilling into data slices; they are for job automation.

The Oracle documentation emphasizes that pipelines are used to manage and execute a series of jobs efficiently, making C the true statement.

In Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation, Forms 2.0 represents an enhanced version of the form design and functionality framework compared to Forms 1.0. To develop forecasts using Forms 2.0, existing forms must be transitioned from the older version to the newer one, as they are not automatically compatible or universally enabled.

D. Migrate the forms you want to work with in Forms 2.0 from Forms 1.0 to Forms 2.0: This is the correct statement. Oracle provides a migration process to convert Forms 1.0 forms to Forms 2.0, enabling users to leverage the advanced features of Forms 2.0 (e.g., improved navigation, dynamic rows/columns, and enhanced usability). This migration is selective, meaning only the forms you choose to use with Forms 2.0 need to be migrated, and it is not a one-time global setup.

A. Set up Forms 2.0 in your environment one time and it will work with all your applications: Forms 2.0 is not a one-time environment-wide setup. It requires specific forms to be migrated or designed for Forms 2.0 compatibility, and not all applications automatically adopt it.

B. Switch between Forms 1.0 and Forms 2.0 by selecting the Forms Version in Application Settings: There is no such toggle in Application Settings to switch between Forms 1.0 and Forms 2.0. The transition to Forms 2.0 involves migration rather than a simple version switch.

C. Redesign forms 1.0 forms so that they are set up to work with Forms 2.0: While redesigning is an option for creating new Forms 2.0-compatible forms, the standard process for existing forms is migration, not a complete redesign from scratch. Migration preserves the form structure while adapting it to Forms 2.0.

The migration process ensures that users can take advantage of Forms 2.0’s capabilities while maintaining continuity with existing form designs, aligning with Oracle’s recommended approach.

References

Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud Documentation: "Working with Forms – Forms 2.0" (docs.oracle.com, updated 2024). States that "to use Forms 2.0, migrate existing Forms 1.0 forms to Forms 2.0 using the provided migration tools."

Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: Confirms that migrating Forms 1.0 to Forms 2.0 is the true setup process for leveraging Forms 2.0 in forecasting.

In Oracle Planning 2024, Smart Push is a feature within data maps that enables efficient, real-time data movement between Oracle EPM Cloud applications or instances. It copies data dynamically when triggered (e.g., via forms or rules). The three supported ways to create data maps with Smart Push are:

A. From Planning to Tax Reporting Cloud: Incorrect. Smart Push does not support direct data movement from Planning to Tax Reporting Cloud, as these modules lack a predefined integration path for this feature.

B. From Tax Reporting Cloud to Planning: Incorrect. Similarly, Smart Push does not facilitate data movement from Tax Reporting Cloud to Planning.

C. From Financial Consolidation and Close to Planning: Correct. Smart Push supports moving consolidated data (e.g., actuals) from Financial Consolidation and Close (FCC) to Planning for planning purposes.

D. From Planning to Financial Consolidation and Close: Correct. Smart Push allows pushing planned data from Planning to FCC for consolidation or reporting.

E. Between two Planning instances: Correct. Smart Push can move data between two Planning instances (e.g., test and production environments) to synchronize data.

These three options—C, D, and E—are explicitly supported by Smart Push in Oracle EPM Cloud, as per the documentation, enabling seamless data integration across these applications.

To allocate project expenses to one or more capital assets in Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation, integration between the Projects and Capital modules must be established. Two specific setup steps are required to enable this data sharing:

B. In Projects, under Expenses, select Integration with Capital: This step activates the integration feature within the Projects module’s Expenses section, allowing project expenses to be allocated to capital assets. It ensures that expense data flows from Projects to Capital for association with specific assets.

D. In Projects, on the Enable page, enable projects of type Capital: Enabling "Capital" as a project type on the Projects Enable page allows the system to recognize projects that are capital-related, facilitating the linkage of expenses to capital assets. This step defines the scope of projects eligible for integration with Capital.

A. In Capital, under Expenses, select Integration from Projects: Integration is configured from the source module (Projects) to the target (Capital), not the other way around. Capital receives data but does not initiate the integration.

C. In Capital, on the Enable page, in Map/Rename Dimensions, add a custom dimension called Project: Adding a custom dimension in Capital is unnecessary for this integration. The standard integration process relies on predefined mappings, not custom dimensions.

Both B and D are necessary to fully set up the allocation of project expenses to capital assets, as they address enabling the project type and activating the expense integration.

References

Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud Documentation: "Administering Projects – Integration with Capital" (docs.oracle.com, updated 2024). Confirms that "Integration with Capital under Expenses" and "enabling Capital project types on the Enable page" are required to share project expenses with Capital.

Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: Lists these two steps as essential for allocating project expenses to capital assets.

In Oracle Planning 2024, the approval process uses an approval unit hierarchy where parent and child relationships influence the review workflow. The two ways these relationships affect the process are:

A. When the status of all children changes to one status (for example, Signed Off), the parent status changes to the same status: Correct. In a bottom-up approval process, when all child approval units reach a uniform status (e.g., Signed Off, Approved), the parent’s status automatically updates to match, reflecting the completion of the children’s review.

B. When you approve a parent, its children are Signed Off: Incorrect. Approving a parent does not automatically sign off its children; the workflow typically moves bottom-up, requiring children to be approved first.

C. After all children are promoted to the same owner, the parent status is changed to Signed Off: Incorrect. Promotion to an owner changes ownership, not necessarily status (e.g., Signed Off). Status changes are driven by approval actions, not just ownership.

D. After all children are promoted to the same owner, the parent is promoted to the owner: Correct. In the approval hierarchy, once all child units are promoted to a new owner (e.g., for review), the parent unit is also promoted to that owner, ensuring the hierarchy progresses together.

The Oracle documentation confirms that A (status aggregation) and D (owner promotion) are key behaviors of parent/child relationships in the approval process, making them the correct answers.

In Oracle Planning 2024, Groovy Rules enhance business logic flexibility. Oracle supports two main types of Groovy Rules:

A. Rules that overwrite member formulas that combine operators and calculation functions, and perform calculations on members in Dimension Editor: Incorrect. Groovy Rules do not overwrite member formulas in the Dimension Editor; they operate at runtime and are defined in the Rules editor, not as static dimension overrides.

B. Rules that can dynamically generate calculation scripts at run time based on contexts such as runtime prompts, the POV, the current grid, and so on: Correct. Oracle supports Groovy Rules that generate dynamic calc scripts based on runtime contexts (e.g., POV, grid data, prompts), enabling adaptive calculations.

C. Pure Groovy rules that can perform data validations and cancel the operation if the data entered violates company policies: Correct. Pure Groovy Rules can validate data (e.g., checking ranges or policies) and cancel operations (e.g., via exceptions), a key feature for enforcing business rules.

D. Rules that dynamically calculate data and perform validation checks in tile charts and infolets: Incorrect. Groovy Rules operate on cubes and forms, not directly within tile charts or infolets, which are UI elements driven by underlying data, not rule execution points.

The Oracle documentation confirms B (dynamic script generation) and C (data validation) as supported Groovy Rule types, making them the correct answers.

In the Oracle Planning 2024 Workforce module, the Synchronize Definitions Mass Update form is the tool provided to update employee properties, job properties, or salary-related information in bulk. This form allows administrators to modify and synchronize metadata definitions across multiple employees or jobs efficiently, ensuring consistency in workforce planning data.

D. Synchronize Definitions: This form enables updates to employee properties (e.g., status, department), job properties (e.g., job code, title), and salary-related information (e.g., salary basis, grade). It is designed to handle mass updates to metadata and ensure that changes are reflected across the Workforce model.

A. Synchronize Defaults: This option is related to applying default assumptions or settings to data, not specifically for updating employee, job, or salary properties.

B. Process Updated Data: This form focuses on processing data changes (e.g., recalculating costs after data entry), not on updating properties or definitions.

C. Process Data and Synchronize Defaults: This is a combined action that processes data and applies defaults, but it does not specifically target updates to employee properties, job properties, or salary information.

The Synchronize Definitions form stands out as the correct choice because it directly addresses bulk updates to workforce metadata, aligning with the question’s focus on properties and salary-related information.

References

Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud Documentation: "Managing Workforce – Mass Update Forms" (docs.oracle.com, updated 2024). Describes the "Synchronize Definitions" form as the tool for updating "employee properties, job properties, and salary-related information."

Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: Confirms that "Synchronize Definitions" is the Mass Update form for modifying workforce metadata.

In Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation’s Workforce module, configuring merit-related settings for employees involves specifying eligibility criteria and timing, such as a hire date cutoff for existing employees to receive merit increases and the month when merit adjustments begin. The Merit Assumptions option is the correct choice for this purpose.

B. Merit Assumptions: This feature allows administrators to define merit-related parameters, including the "hire by" date (the date by which employees must be hired to be eligible for merit) and the "merit start month" (the month when merit increases take effect). It provides a centralized way to set these assumptions, ensuring they are applied consistently across the workforce plan.

A. Workforce Assumptions: This option covers broader workforce settings (e.g., default hire dates, salary assumptions), but it does not specifically address merit eligibility or timing details like hire-by dates or merit start months.

C. Merit Rates: This pertains to defining the percentage or amount of merit increases, not the eligibility dates or start month for merit application.

D. Merit Month: While this might seem relevant, "Merit Month" is not a standalone option in Workforce. It is a setting typically configured within Merit Assumptions, not an independent feature.

The Merit Assumptions option is explicitly designed to handle these merit-specific configurations, making it the most suitable choice.

References

Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud Documentation: "Administering Workforce – Merit Assumptions" (docs.oracle.com, updated 2024). States that "Merit Assumptions allow setting the hire-by date for merit eligibility and the merit start month."

Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: Confirms that Merit Assumptions is used to specify eligibility criteria and timing for merit increases in Workforce.