Paloalto Networks PCNSE Dumps

Palo Alto Networks Device Telemetry data, collected from firewalls with a device certificate installed, is stored on Palo Alto Networks Update Servers. This telemetry data includes information about threats, device health, and other operational metrics that are crucial for the continuous improvement of security services and threat intelligence. The collected data is anonymized and securely transmitted to Palo Alto Networks, where it is used to enhance the overall effectiveness of threat identification and prevention capabilities across all deployed devices. This collaborative approach helps in keeping the security ecosystem updated and resilient against emerging threats.

To collect User-ID information from third-party proxies, Palo Alto Networks supports several methods of integrating user information. Syslog parsing allows the firewall to receive syslog messages from external services, parse them, and extract user information. X-Forwarded-For (XFF) headers, which are used in HTTP requests and proxies, can carry the original IP address of a client connecting through a proxy, and this information can be used by the firewall to map the user IDs.

Syslog is commonly used for integrating third-party devices like proxies with User-ID, and XFF headers are specifically mentioned in the context of integrating user mappings from HTTP traffic. Client probing and Server Monitoring are not the correct methods for pulling data from third-party proxies.

For further details, refer to the Palo Alto Networks documentation on User-ID integration and the "PAN-OS® Administrator’s Guide".

If some sites cannot be decrypted due to technical reasons, such as unsupported ciphers, and blocking them is not an option, then the engineer should add the sites to the SSL Decryption Exclusion list to exempt them from decryption. The SSL Decryption Exclusion list is a predefined list of sites that are not subject to SSL decryption by the firewall. The list includes sites that use certificate pinning, mutual authentication, or unsupported cipher suites. The engineer can also add custom sites to the list if they have a valid business reason or technical limitation for not decrypting them34. Adding the sites to the SSL Decryption Exclusion list will allow the traffic to pass through without being decrypted or blocked by the firewall. References: SSL Decryption Exclusion, Troubleshoot Unsupported Cipher Suites

To create an application-based Security policy rule to allow Evernote, the administrator only needs to add the Evernote application to the Security policy rule. The Evernote application is a predefined App-ID that identifies the traffic generated by the Evernote client or web interface. The Evernote application implicitly uses SSL and web browsing as dependencies, which means that the firewall automatically allows these applications when the Evernote application is allowed. Therefore, there is no need to add HTTP, SSL, or web browsing applications to the same Security policy rule. Adding these applications would broaden the scope of the rule and potentially allow unwanted traffic12. References: App-ID Overview, Create a Security Policy Rule

>Threat logs, create a log forwarding profile to define how you want the firewall or Panorama to handle logs. >Configure an HTTP server profile to forward logs to a remote User-ID agent. > Select the log forwarding profile you created then select this server profile as the HTTP server profile

To block users dynamically based on threat log activity, dynamic user groups (DUGs) with tagging provide an automated solution. Option B configures a DUG with a "malicious" tag, a Log Forwarding profile to tag users in the threat log (e.g., via threat intelligence), and a Security policy to block the tagged group. This leverages User-ID and is ideal for user-based blocking.

Option A uses dynamic address groups (DAGs), which block IPs, not users. Option C (security profiles) can block traffic but not dynamically tag/block users without additional configuration. Documentation supports DUGs for this use case.

To facilitate the integration with external log parsing systems, the firewall allows you to customize the log format; it also allows you to add custom Key: Value attribute pairs. Custom message formats can be configured under DeviceServer ProfilesSyslogSyslog Server ProfileCustom Log Format.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Understanding Log Forwarding in PAN-OS:

Palo Alto Networks firewalls allow forwarding logs to external systems like syslog servers, SNMP servers, or email systems for external analysis or compliance.

Traffic logs can be customized to include additional information that meets the audit or operational requirements.

Syslog Server Profiles:

Syslog Server Profiles specify the format and destination of the log data sent to the syslog server.

These profiles allow customization through the Custom Log Format option, where the firewall engineer can add or modify log fields (e.g., source address, destination address, URL category).

Custom Log Format:

Navigate to Device > Server Profiles > Syslog.

Within the Syslog Server Profile, define a Custom Log Format for traffic logs.

Using this feature, the engineer can include additional fields requested by the internal audit team, such as threat severity, application details, or user ID.

Field Specification:

In the Custom Log Format, fields are defined using variables corresponding to the log fields in PAN-OS.

Example:

$receive_time,$src,$dst,$app,$action,$rule

The engineer can include specific details as requested by the audit team.

Comparison of Other Options:

Option B: Built-in Actions within Objects > Log Forwarding Profile

Log Forwarding Profiles are used to specify what logs are forwarded based on security policy matches. However, they do not control the format of logs.

Log Forwarding Profiles define actions (e.g., forwarding to syslog, SNMP), but customization of log data happens within Syslog Server Profiles.

Option C: Logging and Reporting Settings within Device > Setup > Management

These settings control general logging behavior and settings but do not allow customization of log data for syslog forwarding.

Option D: Data Patterns within Objects > Custom Objects

Data Patterns are used for identifying sensitive data or patterns in data filtering. They are unrelated to log customization.

Why A is Correct?

The Custom Log Format under Device > Server Profiles > Syslog is the only place where additional information can be defined and added to forwarded traffic logs.

This flexibility allows the firewall engineer to meet specific compliance or audit requirements.

Documentation Reference:

PCNSA Study Guide: Logging and Monitoring section discusses Syslog Server Profiles and log forwarding configurations​.

PAN-OS Admin Guide: Covers Custom Log Format configuration under the Syslog Server Profile.

The Test Policy Match tool in Palo Alto Networks' management systems (such as Panorama or the firewall interface) allows administrators to simulate traffic against configured security policies. This tool is critical for ensuring that the correct policies are applied to specific traffic patterns and that no unintended access is granted.

Test Policy Match enables you to input parameters like source IP, destination IP, application, user, and more, and the system will determine which policy would apply.

It is especially useful for verifying the device-group hierarchy in multi-tenant or Panorama-managed environments, ensuring that inherited or overridden rules are correctly applied.

The tool also helps to proactively check that traffic will be blocked or allowed as intended, reducing misconfigurations and preventing unwanted traffic.

A. Preview Changes: This feature is used to review configuration changes before committing them but does not simulate or validate policy matches.

B. Managed Devices Health: This option is related to checking the health and connectivity status of managed devices, not policies.

D. Policy Optimizer: This tool is used to refine existing security policies by identifying overly permissive rules or unused objects, not for testing specific traffic matches.

Key Points:Why not the other options?The Test Policy Match tool is the most appropriate choice for the scenario described.

In a situation where Panorama and its managed firewalls lack internet access, updating PAN-OS requires a manual upload of the downloaded PAN-OS images. The process involves:

D. Upload the image to Panorama > Device Deployment > Software menu, and deploy it to the firewalls:

The engineer first uploads the downloaded PAN-OS images to Panorama. This is done through the "Device Deployment" section, specifically under the "Software" menu. This area of Panorama's interface is designed for managing PAN-OS versions and software updates for the managed devices.

Once the PAN-OS images are uploaded to Panorama, the engineer can then deploy these images to the firewalls directly from Panorama. This process allows for centralized management of software updates, ensuring that all firewalls can be updated to the latest PAN-OS version in a consistent and controlled manner, even without direct internet access.

This method streamlines the update process for environments with strict security requirements, allowing for the efficient deployment of necessary PAN-OS updates to maintain security and functionality.

Push the configuration bundle from Panorama to the newly added firewall to remove all policy rules and objects from its local configuration. This step is necessary to prevent duplicate rule or object names, which would cause commit errors when you push the device group configuration from Panorama to the firewall in the next step.

For SSL Forward Proxy, the firewall generates certificates signed by its CA (here, Untrusted-CA), causing warnings if not trusted by clients. Importing Well-Known-Intermediate-CA and Well-Known-Root-CA into the Default Trusted Certificate Authorities (Option C) and marking them as trusted allows the firewall to issue certificates within this chain, eliminating warnings for sites like important-website.com (Requirement 1). Other untrusted CAs remain untrusted, triggering warnings (Requirement 2).

Option A (install on clients) is impractical and bypasses firewall control. Option B (Forward Untrust) affects all untrusted sites, violating Requirement 2. Option D (Device Certificates) is for firewall auth, not proxy trust. Documentation supports this method.

Advanced WildFire analyzes both the webpage linked by the URL and any files (like PE files) that are downloaded as a result of clicking that link. This includes checking the linked webpage for malicious content and sending any downloaded files for further analysis to determine their behavior and potential malicious intent.

The PCNSA Study Guide outlines that WildFire inspects and analyzes both content downloaded and webpages involved when integrated into the organization's security profile​. This dual-layered approach ensures comprehensive protection against threats from both the webpage and its payloads.

Step-by-Step Explanation

Link Clicked and File Download Triggered:

When the user clicks the link, their action initiates the download of a file, in this case, a Portable Executable (PE) file.

URL Inspection by WildFire:

The URL is immediately inspected for potential threats. This involves analyzing the webpage associated with the link to detect:

Known malicious indicators.

Suspicious elements like embedded scripts, links, or calls to external resources.

Forwarding the PE File for Analysis:

The PE file downloaded as a result of clicking the link is sent to the WildFire cloud or on-premises appliance for detailed behavior-based analysis.

Dynamic and Static Analysis:

Static Analysis: WildFire examines the PE file's attributes without executing it, looking for:

Suspicious code patterns.

Known malicious signatures.

Anomalous PE header details (e.g., timestamp irregularities, unexpected sections).

Dynamic Analysis: The file is executed in a controlled virtual environment to observe:

Behavioral anomalies, like privilege escalation attempts.

Network communication, such as connections to Command and Control (C2) servers.

File system modifications or registry changes indicative of malicious intent.

Threat Verdict:

Based on its findings, WildFire classifies the URL and PE file into one of the following categories:

Benign.

Grayware.

Malware.

Phishing.

Automated Response:

If either the webpage or the PE file is deemed malicious, the firewall takes predefined actions:

Blocking access to the webpage.

Quarantining or blocking the downloaded file.

Generating a detailed alert or log entry for administrators.

Signature Update:

WildFire automatically creates a signature for the detected threat and distributes it globally. This ensures that other systems in the WildFire network are protected against the same threat.

Advanced WildFire Configuration and Behavior

Forwarding File Types:

The WildFire analysis profile must be configured to forward relevant file types. In this case:

PE files are commonly forwarded by default since they are a known vector for malware.

Administrators can define custom forwarding rules based on file type and traffic.

Integration with the Security Profile:

WildFire integrates with other security profiles (e.g., Antivirus, Anti-Spyware, URL Filtering).

URL Filtering ensures that the link itself is categorized and blocked if malicious.

WildFire's output informs and updates the threat prevention database dynamically.

Why the Answer is B?

WildFire performs dual analysis:

The linked webpage is checked for malicious scripts or phishing attempts.

The PE file downloaded is analyzed for malware through both static and dynamic methods.

This layered analysis ensures robust protection against modern threats, which often combine malicious webpages with harmful payloads.

Document References:

PCNSA Study Guide: Domain 4, Section 4.1.5 ("WildFire Analysis") explains the WildFire analysis process in detail, emphasizing its role in inspecting files and URLs for malicious behavior​.

Palo Alto Networks WildFire Admin Guide:

This guide details file forwarding configurations, supported file types, and the global signature distribution process.

PAN-OS Admin Guide:

Sections on Security Profiles and URL Filtering elaborate on how WildFire integrates with other threat prevention mechanisms.

When managing firewalls with Panorama, configurations can be pushed from Panorama templates to managed firewalls. However, there are scenarios where specific settings need to be overridden on the local firewall level due to unique requirements or exceptions.

B. The modification will not be visible in Panorama:

When an override is made directly on the firewall, this change is not automatically reflected back in Panorama's templates or device groups. The local configuration on the firewall will take precedence over the Panorama pushed configuration for the overridden settings, but these local changes will not be visible in the Panorama interface. This means that while Panorama maintains central control and visibility over the bulk of the configuration, it does not have visibility into local overrides made directly on the firewalls.

This distinction is crucial for auditors and administrators to understand, as it impacts how configurations are managed and synchronized between Panorama and the individual firewalls. Local overrides provide flexibility but require careful management to ensure consistency and compliance with security policies.

The "Received fatal alert UnknownCA from client" log indicates the client rejects the firewall’s decryption certificate because it doesn’t trust the CA. For a valid use case, adding the certificate’s Common Name (CN) to the SSL Decryption Exclusion List (Option B) bypasses decryption for that site, allowing traffic to proceed without interruption. This is an immediate fix within the firewall’s control.

Option A (revocation checking) addresses different issues. Option C (check expired certificates) is diagnostic, not immediate. Option D (contact site admin) is external and slow. Documentation recommends exclusions for such errors.

"- Force Template Value will as the name suggest remove any local configuratio and apply the value define the panorama template. But this is valid only for overlapping configuration" "You need to be careful, what is actually defined in the template. For example - if you decide to enable HA in the template, but after that you decide to not push it with template and just disable it again (remove the check from the "Enable HA" checkbox). This still will be part of the template, because now your template is explicitely defining HA disabled. If you made a change in the template, and later decide that you don't want to control this setting with template, you need to revert the config by clicking the green bar next to the changed value"

When deploying a large number of firewalls, such as 15 GlobalProtect gateways around the world, it's crucial to have a scalable configuration approach. Panorama offers several features to help scale configurations efficiently:

B. Template stacks:

Template stacks in Panorama allow administrators to create a collection of configuration templates that can be applied to multiple firewalls or device groups. This enables the consistent deployment of shared settings (such as network configurations, security profiles, etc.) across all managed firewalls, ensuring uniformity and reducing the effort required to manage individual firewall configurations.

D. Variables:

Variables in Panorama provide a way to customize template configurations for individual firewalls or device groups without altering the overall template. For example, a variable can be used to define a unique IP address, hostname, or other specific settings within a shared template. When the template is applied, Panorama replaces the variables with the actual values specified for each device or device group, allowing for customization within a standardized framework.

By using template stacks and variables, an administrator can rapidly deploy and manage configurations across multiple GlobalProtect gateways, ensuring consistency while still accommodating site-specific requirements. This approach streamlines the deployment process and enhances the manageability of a widespread GlobalProtect infrastructure.

Based on the provided table, the GlobalProtect portal agent configuration includes four gateways with varying priorities and response times. Users will connect to the gateway with the highest priority and, if multiple gateways share the same priority, the one with the lowest response time.

Answer Determination

Prioritize by Priority Level:

East: Highest

South: High

West: Medium

Central: Low

Evaluate Response Times Within Each Priority:

East (Highest): 35 ms

South (High): 30 ms

West (Medium): 50 ms

Central (Low): 20 ms

Given the highest priority is "East" with a response time of 35 ms, users will connect to the East gateway based on the highest priority.

When building Security rules in a Device Group that need to allow traffic to specific users and groups defined in Active Directory, it's essential to have user and group information available in Panorama to select these entities for the rules.

D. A master device with Group Mapping configured must be set in the device group where the Security rules are configured:

The concept of a "master device" in Panorama refers to a specific firewall that is designated to provide certain settings or information, such as user and group mappings from Active Directory, to Panorama. This information can then be used across other firewalls within the same device group.

By configuring Group Mapping on a master device, Panorama can leverage this information to populate user and group objects. These objects can then be used in Security rules within the device group, allowing for the creation of policies that are based on user identity and group membership, as defined in Active Directory.

This setup ensures that Panorama has the necessary context to apply user- and group-based policies accurately across the managed firewalls, facilitating centralized management and consistency in policy enforcement.

The compare option for a specific rule in the New App Viewer under Policy Optimizer allows an administrator to compare the applications configured in the rule with the applications seen from traffic matching the same rule. This helps the administrator to identify any new applications that are not explicitly defined in the rule, but are implicitly allowed by the firewall based on the dependencies of the configured applications. The compare option also shows the usage statistics and risk levels of the applications, and provides suggestions for optimizing the rule by adding, removing, or replacing applications12. References: New App Viewer (Policy Optimizer), PCNSE Study Guide (page 47)

 The correct packet-flow sequence is C. PBF > Static route > Security policy enforcement. This sequence describes the order of operations that the firewall performs when processing a packet. PBF stands for Policy-Based Forwarding, which is a feature that allows the firewall to override the routing table and forward traffic based on the source and destination addresses, application, user, or service. PBF is evaluated before the static route lookup, which is the default method of forwarding traffic based on the destination address and the longest prefix match. Security policy enforcement is the stage where the firewall applies the security policy rules to allow or block traffic based on various criteria, such as zone, address, port, user, application, etc12. References: Policy-Based Forwarding, Packet Flow Sequence in PAN-OS

Traffic didnt match any other policies and so landed at the implicit "deny all" policy. If it's deny all, the traffic was dropped before the application could be determined.

When a URL matches multiple categories, the category chosen is the one that has the most severe action defined below (block being most severe and allow least severe).

1 block

2 override

3 continue

4 alert

5 allow

Packet Buffer Protection mitigates single-session DoS attacks by monitoring resource usage on ingress zones. It applies to new sessions only (to prevent resource exhaustion before escalation) and is not global—it’s zone-specific, configured under Zone Protection profiles.

Options A and D (global) are incorrect; it’s per-zone. Options C and D (existing sessions) don’t align with its proactive design. Documentation specifies this behavior.

The type of policy in Palo Alto Networks firewalls that can use Device-ID as a match condition is QoS. This is because Device-ID is a feature that allows the firewall to identify and classify devices on the network based on their characteristics, such as vendor, model, OS, and role1. QoS policies are used to allocate bandwidth and prioritize traffic based on various criteria, such as application, user, source, destination, and device2. By using Device-ID as a match condition in QoS policies, the firewall can apply different QoS actions to different types of devices, such as IoT devices, laptops, smartphones, etc3. This can help optimize the network performance and ensure the quality of service for critical applications and devices.

In a High Availability (HA) setup with Palo Alto Networks firewalls, the synchronization of IPsec tunnel Security Associations (SAs) is an important aspect to ensure seamless failover and continued secure communication. Specifically, for Phase 2 SAs, they are synchronized over the HA2 links. The HA2 link is dedicated to synchronizing sessions, forwarding tables, IPSec SA, ARP tables, and other critical information between the active and passive firewalls in an HA pair. This ensures that the passive unit can immediately take over in case the active unit fails, without the need for re-establishing IPsec tunnels, thereby maintaining secure communications without interruption. It's important to note that Phase 1 SAs, which are responsible for establishing the secure tunnel itself, are not synchronized between the HA pair, as these need to be re-established upon failover to ensure secure key exchange.

TIPS & TRICKS: REDUCING MANAGEMENT PLANE LOAD:

TIPS & TRICKS: REDUCING MANAGEMENT PLANE LOAD—PART 2:

In PAN-OS, the Log Forwarding object under Objects configures forwarding for Authentication (Option B) and User-ID (Option C) logs, among others, to external systems (e.g., syslog servers).

Option A (GlobalProtect) and Option D (WildFire) logs are managed differently (e.g., via profiles or Panorama). Documentation lists supported log types in Log Forwarding.

A, C, and D are the correct answers because they are the parts of a template that an engineer can configure in Panorama. A template is a collection of device and network settings that can be pushed to multiple firewalls from Panorama1. A template can contain settings such as2:

A: NTP Server Address: This is the address of the Network Time Protocol server that synchronizes the time on the firewall.

C: Authentication Profile: This is the profile that defines how the firewall authenticates users and administrators.

D: Service Route Configuration: This is the configuration that specifies which interface and source IP address the firewall uses to access external services, such as DNS, email, syslog, etc.

To determine the egress interface a Palo Alto Networks firewall will use to route a specific IP address, the appropriate command is test routing fib-lookup ip 10.2.5.3 virtual-router default. This command performs a Forwarding Information Base (FIB) lookup for the specified IP address within the context of the specified virtual router, which in this case is the default virtual router. The FIB lookup process checks the routing table and the associated forwarding information to determine the next-hop and the egress interface for the given IP address. This command is instrumental for troubleshooting and verifying routing decisions made by the firewall to ensure that traffic is routed as expected through the network infrastructure.

The Palo Alto Networks Best Practices for Anti-Spyware Profiles recommend enabling single-packet captures (PCAP) for medium, high, and critical severity threats. This allows for capturing the first packet of the malicious traffic for further analysis and investigation. PCAP should not be enabled for low and informational severity threats, as they generate a relatively high volume of traffic and are not particularly useful compared to potential threats2. References: Create the Data Center Best Practice Anti-Spyware Profile, Security Profile: Anti-Spyware, PCNSE Study Guide (page 57)

A transparent proxy operates by intercepting traffic without client configuration, typically redirecting HTTP (port 80) or HTTPS (port 443) to a proxy port on the firewall. In Palo Alto Networks NGFWs, when configuring a NAT rule for a transparent proxy, the standard translated port is 8080 (Option C), commonly used for proxy services. This port is where the firewall redirects client traffic for processing (e.g., URL filtering or decryption) before forwarding it to the destination.

Option A (80) is the original HTTP port, not a proxy port. Option B (443) is for HTTPS, not transparent proxy redirection. Option D (4443) is non-standard and unrelated. Documentation and best practices confirm 8080 for this use case.

When an administrator needs to evaluate recent policy changes that were committed and pushed to a firewall device group in Panorama, the most direct approach is to use the "Preview Changes" feature.

A. Click Preview Changes under Push Scope:

The "Preview Changes" option is available under the "Push Scope" in Panorama. This feature allows administrators to see a detailed comparison of the changes that are about to be pushed to the managed firewalls or that have been recently pushed. It highlights the differences between the current configuration and the previous one, making it easier to identify exactly what changes were made, including modifications to policies, objects, and other settings.

This is particularly useful for auditing and verifying that the intended changes match the actual changes being deployed, enhancing transparency and reducing the risk of unintended configuration modifications.

This approach provides a clear and concise way to review configuration changes before and after they are applied, ensuring that policy modifications are intentional and accurately reflect the administrator's objectives.

For log forwarding in PAN-OS, traffic and threat logs require a Log Forwarding profile attached to Security rules (Option B) to send logs to external systems (e.g., syslog, Panorama). Without this, logs are stored locally but not forwarded, a critical design consideration.

Option A (enhanced logging) affects app details, not forwarding. Option C (App-ID) is false; App-ID works independently. Option D (Logging and Reporting Settings) is incorrect; profiles are rule-based. Documentation mandates this configuration.

The linked documentation outlines new features for IPSec transport mode in PAN-OS 11.0 and clarifies the requirements for configuring IPSec in transport mode. Based on this:

Auto-Generated Key:

The documentation specifies that IPSec in transport mode requires an auto-generated key during the IKE negotiation process. This ensures the integrity and encryption of the communication channel.

Verdict: Correct.

NAT Traversal:

NAT Traversal is only relevant when NAT is present between the IPSec peers. It is not an inherent requirement for IPSec transport mode.

Verdict: Not correct.

IKEv1:

While IKE (v1 or v2) is required for IPSec, the question specifically asks for transport mode requirements, and IKEv1 is not listed as a strict transport mode requirement in the documentation.

Verdict: Not correct.

DH-group 20 (ECP-384 bits):

The documentation mentions that DH-group 20 (Elliptic Curve Protocol, 384-bit) is one of the required Diffie-Hellman groups for transport mode. This ensures secure key exchange.

Verdict: Correct.

Correct Answer

Based on the documentation: A. Auto Generated Key

D. DH-group 20 (ECP-384 bits)

Why This Answer is Correct

Auto-generated key is fundamental to secure communication in transport mode, as stated in the PAN-OS 11.0 documentation.

DH-group 20 ensures a high level of cryptographic strength for key exchange, making it a specific requirement for transport mode in this context.

Reference

For more details, refer to the PAN-OS 11.0 IPSec Transport Mode documentation: IPSec Transport Mode

Policy-Based Forwarding (PBF) on Palo Alto Networks firewalls allows administrators to define forwarding decisions based on criteria other than the destination IP address, such as the application, source address, or user. It can address scenarios like:

A. Routing FTP to a backup ISP link to save bandwidth on the primary ISP link: PBF can be configured to identify FTP traffic and route it through a different ISP, preserving bandwidth on the primary link for other critical applications.

B. Providing application connectivity when the primary circuit fails: PBF can be used for failover purposes, directing traffic to an alternate path if the primary connection goes down, ensuring continuous application availability.

PBF is not designed to bypass Layer 7 inspection or forward traffic based solely on source port, as these tasks are managed through different mechanisms within the firewall's operating system.

To apply tags automatically based on User-ID logs, the engineer must configure a Log Forwarding profile that specifies the criteria for matching the logs and the tags to apply. The Log Forwarding profile can be attached to a security policy rule or a decryption policy rule to enable auto-tagging for the traffic that matches the rule. The tags can then be used for dynamic address groups, policy enforcement, or reporting1. References: Use Auto-Tagging to Automate Security Actions, PCNSE Study Guide (page 49)

Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS) ensures unique session keys per VPN session, enabled under the IKE Gateway advanced options (Option A) by selecting a Diffie-Hellman (DH) group. This resolves Phase 2 mismatches if the peer requires PFS.

Option B (IPsec Tunnel) doesn’t directly control PFS. Option C (DH Group in IPsec Crypto) is related but not the enablement point. Option D (authentication algorithm) is unrelated. Documentation specifies IKE Gateway for PFS.

WildFire logs showing a "malicious" verdict with an "allow" action indicate that the initial traffic wasn’t blocked in real-time, likely because the Antivirus profile isn’t configured to act immediately on WildFire verdicts. By default, WildFire submits files for analysis, and signatures may take up to 24 hours to propagate globally unless real-time blocking is enabled. Configuring the Antivirus security profile (Option B) to "block" on malicious WildFire verdicts ensures that threats are blocked within minutes once the verdict is returned (typically 5-15 minutes), leveraging WildFire’s real-time signature updates.

Option A (WildFire analysis profile) defines what files are sent to WildFire but doesn’t control blocking actions. Option C (File Blocking profile) manages file type blocking, not threat verdicts. Option D (file size limits) affects submission eligibility, not blocking behavior. The Antivirus profile is the key to real-time WildFire enforcement, as per Palo Alto Networks documentation.

The AIOps Plugin for Panorama enhances security management by proactively validating commits against best practices (Option B). It analyzes policies, provides recommendations (e.g., unused rules, misconfigurations), and advises administrators before pushing changes, improving security posture without automatic enforcement.

Option A (auto-push) overstates its role; it advises, not pushes. Option C (auto-correct) is inaccurate; it suggests, not fixes. Option D (retroactive checks) misaligns with its proactive design. Documentation highlights its advisory function.

SSL/TLS profile is only the TLS versions, not ciphers. Decryption Profile is for SSL Inbound and Forward Proxy applications, not mgmt of the PANW Firewall. There's also KB articles to strengthen SSH, but I couldn't find any for HTTPS, on the mgmt interface: &lang=en_US%E2%80%A9