Paloalto Networks XSOAR-Engineer Dumps

The !setIncident command is the documented method for updating incident fields programmatically in Cortex XSOAR. The Admin Guide states that the syntax requires proper quoting for parameters, especially when assigning descriptive text that may include spaces. The correct syntax is:

!setIncident description="some text"

This updates the built-in description field at the incident level and allows widgets, dashboards, and reports to use the updated description because XSOAR widgets can read incident fields directly. OptionAuses correct syntax with quotes included.

Option B incorrectly uses !Set, which modifiescontext keys, not incident fields. Option C is invalid due to incorrect parameter formatting (hyphens instead of equals signs). Option D omits quotation marks, causing parsing errors in cases where the value includes spaces, verbs, or punctuation.

Thus, the only correct and fully documented method to update an incident’s description so that it is available to widgets isA: !setIncident description="…".

The XSOAR Playbook Editor allows engineers to manipulate and transform context data dynamically. According to the XSOAR Admin and Playbook Development Guides,“Extend Context”is the dedicated mechanism that enables a task to save output values into new or existing context keys, including keys that correspond to incident fields. By defining a key under the “Extend Context” section, the playbook task can map specific outputs—such as JSON fields, strings, arrays, or nested objects—to a structured location within the incident context. These keys can then be used to populate incident fields through further playbook tasks, field mappings, or automated incident field updates.

Classification (option A) applies only during ingestion and cannot assign task outputs to incident fields. Inputs (option B) define what data a task receives, not how it is stored afterward. Mapping (option D) belongs to the ingestion pipeline and determines how event fields become incident fields during creation, not during playbook execution.

Therefore,Extend Contextis the correct feature that allows a task to associate its output with incident fields, making optionCthe correct answer based on documentation.

In Cortex XSOAR,Reportsare constructed fromWidgets, which are modular visualization components that pull data from incidents, indicators, tasks, lists, and other system sources. The Admin Guide clarifies that widgets serve as the building blocks for dashboards and reports. When creating a report, users select widgets—such as pie charts, tables, statistics blocks, histograms, and custom scripts—and XSOAR aggregates the underlying data (incidents, indicators, evidence, etc.) into the report output.

Automations (option B) may generate data, but they do not perform the aggregation within a report. SQL queries (option C) are not used natively in XSOAR reporting; instead, widgets may embed queries through the platform’s data model. Playbooks (option D) execute response workflows and can generate additional context but are not used for aggregating report data.

Thus, the report-generation process relies entirely on widgets to extract, sort, count, and visualize information. XSOAR renders the report by collecting the aggregated values produced by each widget. This makes optionAthe correct and documented answer.

According to the Cortex XSOAR Indicator Lifecycle documentation, when an indicator reaches its expiration date or is manually set toExpired, the platform doesnotdelete it. Instead, the indicator remains fully stored within the Indicator Store and can still be searched, viewed, and referenced within the system. Expiration affectshow the indicator behaves operationally, not whether it still exists in the database. Specifically, an expired indicatorno longer participates in active enrichment, matching, or classificationworkflows. It will not trigger rules, correlation, or alerting functionality, and enrichment engines stop providing updates.

The system retains expired indicators for historical accuracy, audit trail completeness, and investigation continuity. Deleting indicators automatically would compromise incident history and threat intelligence analytics, which XSOAR explicitly avoids. Furthermore, the documentation states that indicator deletion is alwaysmanualunless automated cleanup is configured, and even then, expiration alone does not initiate deletion.

Thus, the correct statement is optionA: the indicatorstill exists and remains searchable, maintaining its presence in XSOAR’s intelligence repository while no longer influencing automated processes. Options B, C, and D contradict documented indicator-retention behavior.

The XSOAR Timers/SLA documentation states that when an incident reaches the Closed state, all timers automatically stop and cannot continue unless manually reset. Timers do not pause — they terminate.

Additionally, when an incident is closed, its associated playbook completes, because closure marks the end of the investigation lifecycle.

The XSOAR Incident Relationships model provides multiple ways to connect related incidents for correlation and hierarchical investigation. The Admin Guide details howRelate Incidentscreates a logical link between two or more incidents, identifying them as connected without altering their internal data. This is commonly used when incidents share a common threat, indicator, or root cause.

Join Incidentsallows analysts to group multiple incidents under a single parent investigation while keeping them technically separate. Joined incidents appear together in correlation views and analytics dashboards, enabling SOC teams to assess broader attack patterns. Joining does not merge content or overwrite fields; it simply binds multiple incidents under a shared investigative umbrella.

“Add Child Incidents” (option B) is used for parent–child hierarchical workflows, not grouping related violations. “Merge Incidents” (option D) consolidates multiple incidents into one and deletes the originals, which is not the intended function for grouping related but distinct events.

The XSOAR Playbook Debugger documentation states that breakpoints only apply when the playbook is run in Debug mode, not when an incident triggers the playbook normally.

Running from an incident executes the playbook without debugger controls, so breakpoints are ignored—leading to the deletion task running normally.

The XSOAR Incident State Model defines several system statuses: Pending, Active, In-Progress, Done, and Closed. When an incident is newly created and has not yet had a playbook assigned or started—and no analyst actions (such as commands or work plan steps) have been taken—it remains in the Pending state.

Pending indicates that the incident exists in the system but has not yet begun active investigation or automated processing. The Admin Guide clarifies that an incident becomes Active only when a playbook starts or an analyst interacts with it. In-Progress is a manually applied user state indicating active human processing. Waiting is used for blocked or paused tasks but does not apply at initial creation.

Because the War Room is available but unused, and no automation has begun, the incident fits the definition of Pending exactly. Once a playbook were attached or a command were executed, the state would transition to Active.

Therefore, the documented correct answer is B: Pending.

XSOAR’s ingestion pipeline defines a strict order in which raw fetched data is processed, and the Admin Guide explains that Classification determines the incident type based on incoming fields, while Mapping performs the actual transformation of event data into structured incident fields. Mapping profiles define how each field from the integration’s raw JSON (for example, source_ip, username, alert_id) is converted into standard or custom incident fields.

The Mapping Editor allows administrators to select specific fields from the incoming event data and bind them to incident fields used throughout playbooks, layouts, and reports. This ensures normalization of data and consistent schema usage across the SOC.

The documentation makes clear that Mapping is responsible for populating incident field values, whereas Classification only chooses the incident type. Field configuration defines field metadata but does not map values. Layout configuration controls visual presentation only and does not populate fields.

Thus, option B (Mapping) is the function that converts event data into incident field values and is the correct answer according to the ingestion architecture documented in the XSOAR Admin Guide.

XSOAR’s built-inLists Servicesupports operations such as creating, updating, and appending items to lists using automation commands. The correct command for appending a value to an existing list is!addToList, which inserts the new string (in this case an email address) into the list array stored within the XSOAR Lists infrastructure.

The Admin Guide describes!addToListas the intended mechanism to add new elements to a named list while automatically handling JSON structure and avoiding duplication errors.

Option B, !appendToListContext, modifiescontext data, not persistent platform lists—therefore it will not update the BlockedSenders list. Option C misuses !setIncident, which updates incident fields only, not system lists. Option D, !createListItem, is used when an integration or automation script exposes a “create item” action, not for native XSOAR lists.

Thus, the correct and documented method of adding an email value to a persistent XSOAR list is!addToList, making optionAthe accurate choice.

The XSOAR RBAC documentation states that role-based permissions can restrict user access to dashboards. When the administrator selects“Only allow these dashboards”within a role, the platform enforces a strict limitation: users assigned to this role can viewonlythe dashboards explicitly listed in the role configuration. These dashboards become theirdefault and sole available dashboards. They cannot create new dashboards, modify existing ones, delete dashboards, or access any dashboard not included in the allowed list. This setting is typically used in regulated environments or SOC tiers where dashboard visibility must align with job function and least-privilege principles.

The documentation clarifies that this permission setting removes access to any dashboards not included, overriding normal dashboard-sharing behavior. Therefore, options suggesting the user can modify dashboards (A or B) or automatically gain access to shared dashboards (C) contradict RBAC restrictions. The correct behavior is complete restriction: users canonlyview the explicitly authorized dashboards, withno ability to modifythem. Thus, optionDreflects the exact enforced behavior per XSOAR’s role permissions model.

The XSOAR Layouts documentation states that scripts can appear inside incident layouts only when they are designated as Dynamic Section scripts. Dynamic Sections are special script types that run automatically within layouts to display enrichment data, contextual summaries, or markdown-rendered information.

When creating such a script, the developer must mark it with the "dynamic-section" tag; otherwise, XSOAR does not expose it as an option during layout configuration. Without this mandatory tag, the script is treated as an ordinary automation and therefore cannot be placed into layout components.

Permissions (option B) affect script execution but do not prevent it from appearing in the layout editor. Integration commands (option C) are unrelated—dynamic sections do not use integration command definitions. Markdown output type (option D) determines formatting only and does not affect whether the script is selectable within the layout editor.

Thus, the missing configuration step is failing to tag the script as a Dynamic Section, making option A the correct answer according to the official XSOAR documentation.