Pegasystems PEGACPRSA22V1 Dumps

(Correct Order):

Start the interrogation for the Windows application.

Interrogate the Windows form.

Navigate to the window that contains the menu.

Select the control in the control hierarchy list.

In the More menu, select Add menu items.

In the Add Menu Items dialog box, select the menu items.

Click OK to save the selection

Unlike web or text-based controls, Windows application menus (such as File, Edit, or Help) are often rendered as non-standard Windows controls that cannot be directly interrogated using the bullseye tool.

Instead, Pega Robot Studio provides a specific method to add menu items through the interrogation hierarchy.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Interrogating Menu Items in Windows Applications”:

“Menu items in Windows applications are not directly interrogated through visual selection.

Instead, the process involves interrogating the parent form, identifying the menu control in the hierarchy, and then using the ‘Add Menu Items’ option to expose individual menu commands as controls.

Steps:

Start interrogation for the Windows adapter.

Interrogate the main form that contains the menu bar.

Navigate to the window containing the menu to ensure visibility.

In the control hierarchy, select the menu bar control.

From the More menu, choose Add menu items.

In the Add Menu Items dialog box, select the menu items to expose as interrogated controls.

Click OK to confirm and save your selections.”

Detailed Step Reasoning:

Start the interrogation for the Windows application.

Launches the adapter and begins the interrogation session.

Interrogate the Windows form.

Interrogates the main form containing the menu bar control (the top-level parent for menus).

Navigate to the window that contains the menu.

Ensures the correct active window is in focus for interrogation.

Select the control in the control hierarchy list.

Identifies the menu bar or parent control within the form’s hierarchy.

In the More menu, select Add menu items.

Opens the configuration dialog for menu interrogation.

In the Add Menu Items dialog box, select the menu items.

Displays a list of all available menu items to expose as automatable elements.

Click OK to save the selection.

Finalizes interrogation and creates the selected menu items as controls in the project hierarchy.

Final Ordered Steps:

Order

Interrogation Step

1

Start the interrogation for the Windows application.

2

Interrogate the Windows form.

3

Navigate to the window that contains the menu.

4

Select the control in the control hierarchy list.

5

In the More menu, select Add menu items.

6

In the Add Menu Items dialog box, select the menu items.

7

Click OK to save the selection.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

In Pega Robot Studio, when interrogating Java applications, sometimes a child process is created separately from the main application process. In such cases, controls in the child process cannot be detected unless the adapter is configured to attach to child processes as well.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, in the section “Java Application Integration and Child Processes”:

“For Java applications that spawn additional processes, set the HookChildProcesses property of the adapter to True.

This enables the adapter to attach to both the main process and any child processes created by the parent application, allowing interrogation and automation of controls within those secondary windows.”

Detailed Reasoning:

HookChildProcesses ensures that when a Java application spawns a new process (such as a popup or a grid), Pega Robotics attaches to and monitors that process.

Without enabling this property, the adapter would only recognize the primary Java process, leaving controls in secondary processes unrecognized.

Option Analysis:

A. HookChildProcesses: Correct. Allows interrogation of child processes.

B. EnableMatchInProcess: Incorrect. Used for controlling object matching within the same process context.

C. TargetPath: Incorrect. Defines executable location for adapters.

D. IgnoreMainBrowser: Incorrect. Related to web adapters, not Java applications.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

When debugging automations in Pega Robot Studio, breakpoints are used to pause execution at specific points in an automation to inspect data and control flow. Before deploying or packaging a robotic solution, it is recommended to remove or clear all breakpoints to ensure that the production build executes uninterrupted.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Debugging Automations and Managing Breakpoints”:

“Breakpoints can be added, enabled, disabled, or deleted directly from the automation design surface or from the Debugging Tools window.

To remove breakpoints, developers can:

Right-click a breakpoint in the automation and select Remove Breakpoint.

Clear all breakpoints globally from the Breakpoints tab within the Debugging Tools window.

Breakpoints are maintained per automation and persist between sessions until manually removed or cleared.”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. Clear all automation breakpoints in the Breakpoints tab of the Debugging tools window.

Correct. This is the global method to remove all existing breakpoints across multiple automations at once.

The Breakpoints tab under Debug → Windows → Breakpoints lists every active breakpoint and includes the Clear All option to delete them.

B. Right-click a breakpoint in an automation, and then select Remove Breakpoint.

Correct. This is the direct method for deleting an individual breakpoint from within a specific automation.

C. Use the hot keys to remove each automation link that includes a breakpoint.

Incorrect. There is no hot key dedicated to breakpoint removal in Pega Robot Studio.

D. Right-click an automation on the automation surface, and then select Delete all breakpoints.

Incorrect. There is no such option available at the automation (background surface) level. Breakpoints are only removable individually or through the Breakpoints tab.

E. Click a breakpoint in an automation, and then press the Delete key.

Incorrect. The Delete key removes automation components, not debugging breakpoints.

Final Correct Answers:

A. Clear all automation breakpoints in the Breakpoints tab of the Debugging tools window.

B. Right-click a breakpoint in an automation, and then select Remove Breakpoint.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

When deploying robotic solutions to Pega Robot Manager, the connection and authentication details — such as Robot Manager server URL, authentication mode, and registration configuration — are stored in the file CommonConfig.xml.

This configuration file is shared between both Pega Robot Studio and Pega Robot Runtime, ensuring that both use consistent connectivity settings.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Pega Robot Manager Integration and Configuration Files”:

“The CommonConfig.xml file contains shared configuration information that is used by both Pega Robot Studio and Pega Robot Runtime.

It includes global settings such as:

Connection information for Pega Robot Manager (URL, ports, authentication)

Deployment configuration values

Environment registration and runtime connectivity settings.

PegaRuntimeConfig.xml and PegaStudioConfig.xml are used for local settings only, while CommonConfig.xml stores the Robot Manager connection configuration used during deployment.”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. PegaStudioConfig.xml – Used for developer-specific configuration within Robot Studio, not for deployment or server settings.

B. CommonConfig.xml – Correct. This file contains the Robot Manager connectivity configuration and shared settings.

C. PegaRuntimeConfig.xml – Controls runtime behavior on client machines, not Robot Manager connections.

D. PegaConfig.xml – Not a valid configuration file in Pega Robotics.

In Pega Robot Studio, an environment override allows developers to configure multiple deployment environments (such as test, staging, and production) using a single project. This helps you avoid creating separate projects for each environment and ensures consistent automation logic while dynamically switching between environment-specific settings at runtime.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Managing Environment Overrides and Multi-Environment Deployments”:

“Environment overrides provide a mechanism to define environment-specific configuration values for applications within a project.

For example, the same automation logic can be used for both test and production systems by creating separate environment override files — one for the test environment and one for the production environment — each specifying unique paths, credentials, or URLs for the corresponding system.”

Detailed Reasoning:

The HR system has different access points for test and production, which typically means different URLs or executable paths.

The automation logic (how the robot interacts with the HR application) remains identical; only the connection configuration changes.

Therefore, instead of creating multiple applications or modifying logic, you configure two environment override files — one for production and one for test — each defining environment-specific details such as:

Application path (for Windows adapters)

StartPage URL (for web adapters)

Credentials or runtime parameters

This allows a single automation project to adapt dynamically based on which environment override is active during deployment or testing.

Option Analysis:

A. Incorrect — A single override cannot contain two sets of environment details; each override corresponds to one environment.

B. Incorrect — Creating two applications increases complexity and redundancy; both would duplicate the same logic.

C. Incorrect — Adding both separate applications and overrides is unnecessary; overrides alone are sufficient for environment flexibility.

D. Correct — Two environment overrides (one for production, one for test) allow the same project and automation logic to function properly across both environments.

Therefore, the correct answer is D. Create two environment overrides for the HR System project: one override for production, and one for test.

In Pega Platform, data objects used for integration with robot activities (whether attended or unattended) must be scalar properties — that is, single-value fields such as Text, Decimal, Date, Boolean, etc. Scalar properties represent discrete, individual data elements that can be directly serialized and passed between Pega Platform and Pega Robot Studio automations.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Data Mapping Between Robot Activities and Pega Case Data”:

“Robot activities can import and export data values only for scalar properties.

Scalar properties represent single data items, while complex or list structures (such as Page Lists or Page Groups) cannot be directly transferred.

Complex data types must be iterated or flattened before being used in a robot activity.”

In the image provided, the data model includes several scalar properties (e.g., AmountOfTransactionToDispute, pyID, TransactionAmount) and one list-type property — Transactions, defined as a List of records.

Detailed Reasoning:

A. AmountOfTransactionToDispute — Scalar property of type Decimal. Can be imported/exported by robot activities.

B. pyID — Scalar property of type Text (single line). Can be used in robot activity data mapping.

C. Transactions — Non-scalar property defined as a List of records.

This represents a collection (a Page List) rather than a single field.

Robot activities cannot directly import or export this type; it must be handled via iteration or transformation before use.

D. TransactionAmount — Scalar property of type Decimal. Can be imported/exported normally.

Therefore, Transactions is the only non-scalar property in the model and cannot be directly imported or exported to or from a robot activity.

Final Correct Answer: C. Transactions

In Pega Robot Studio, the Project Explorer provides a structured view of all the components that belong to a project. These include applications, automations, and any methods (application-level procedures) associated with each application. The hierarchy in the Project Explorer reflects the relationship and scope of these components.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide (Project Structure and Scoping Rules section):

“Each application added to a Pega Robotics project appears under the ‘Globals’ node.

Automations are listed as separate automation objects under the application node.

Application methods such as Login or CustomerSearch are defined directly under the application to which they belong, following the hierarchy:

Globals → ApplicationName → Automations → Application Methods.”

Based on this structure:

The Globals node appears at the top.

The BankerInsight application appears under Globals.

Within BankerInsight, the two automations — AddCustomer and RemoveCustomer — are listed.

Under the same application node, the application methods CustomerSearch and Login also appear, showing they belong specifically to the BankerInsight scope.

Option C correctly represents this hierarchy because it shows:

Globals at the root.

BankerInsight as the single application node.

Under BankerInsight, both automations (AddCustomer, RemoveCustomer) and the application methods (CustomerSearch, Login) appear in sequence.

Other options show misplaced or missing elements:

Option A: Incorrect — does not display both automations and methods under the same hierarchy.

Option B: Incorrect — application methods are misplaced outside of the BankerInsight node.

Option D: Incorrect — application methods appear incorrectly scoped under separate folders.

Therefore, Option C aligns perfectly with the standard Pega Robotics Project Explorer hierarchy for the given configuration.

When interrogating a single-page web application (SPA), controls often reside within dynamic DOM regions or logical page views that reload content without changing the page URL.

To effectively interrogate such controls, developers must create containers that define a logical grouping for the dynamic content—allowing Pega Robot Studio to maintain proper context when referencing those controls.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Interrogating Single-Page Web Applications”:

“When interrogating single-page web applications (SPA), developers must first create a container that represents the logical view within which controls exist.

Navigate to the page or view where the target control appears.

In the Interrogation Form, select Select Element to enable control selection mode.

Use the Bullseye tool to highlight and select the control or parent HTML element.

From the list of detected controls, choose the desired control to bind.

Click Create Container to define the logical page grouping for the interrogated control.

Click Close to exit the dialog once the container has been successfully created.”

Detailed Step Reasoning:

Navigate to the view that contains the control.

Ensures that the desired control is visible within the web application’s dynamic content area.

On the Interrogation Form, select the Select Element interrogation option.

Activates the Select Element mode, allowing you to interrogate web-based elements precisely.

Drag and drop the bullseye icon to the control.

Highlights the specific control in the web application that you want to interrogate.

Select the control from the list.

Confirms which element to bind from the list of detected elements in the DOM.

Click Create Container.

Creates a container object in the automation hierarchy that represents the logical view of the web application (essential for SPAs).

Click Close to close the dialog box.

Completes the interrogation process and finalizes the container creation.

Final Ordered Steps:

Order

Interrogation Step

1

Navigate to the view that contains the control.

2

On the Interrogation Form, select the Select Element interrogation option.

3

Drag and drop the bullseye icon to the control.

4

Select the control from the list.

5

Click Create Container.

6

Click Close to close the dialog box.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

The Excel Connector in Pega Robot Studio is a lightweight component that provides direct interaction with Excel files without relying on the Microsoft Excel application. It is ideal for background processing, where users are not required to interact with Excel directly.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide (Excel Integration and Connectors section):

“The Excel Connector allows automations to open, read, and modify Excel workbooks without requiring Microsoft Excel to be installed.

It operates directly on the file system level, supporting operations such as reading or writing to specific cells, entire worksheets, or data ranges.

The connector does not use Excel Interop; therefore, no interrogation or Excel application process is necessary.”

Explanation of Options:

A. Correct — The Excel Connector supports data range operations such as defining, reading, or writing to specific sets of cells within a worksheet.

B. Incorrect — The connector does not depend on any installed version of Microsoft Office; it functions independently.

C. Incorrect — Interrogation applies to UI applications, not file-based connectors like Excel Connector.

D. Correct — The connector works without Excel being installed; it manipulates workbook data directly through file handling APIs.

E. Incorrect — When user interaction with Excel is required, Excel Interop (Excel Application Connector) should be used instead of the file-based Excel Connector.

Therefore, the correct statements are A and D.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

According to Pega Robotics Studio – Matching and Interrogation Tools Documentation:

“Matching defines how a control is identified at runtime. When application hierarchies change or specific match rules fail, Robot Studio provides diagnostic tools to reestablish and verify the correct control associations.”

The guide specifies the following tools and their purpose:

Refresh Matching

“Refresh Matching updates the control’s properties and hierarchy information based on the current application structure without re-interrogating the control. This tool is useful when an application’s DOM or hierarchy has changed.”

Debug Matching

“Debug Matching opens the Match Rules Diagnostics window and evaluates each match rule in real-time to show which rules pass or fail. It assists in identifying which match rule must be corrected or replaced.”

By contrast:

Replace Matching – Recreates the match rules from scratch (not the preferred first step).

Replace Control – Reinterrogates the entire control and removes existing references (used only when the control is entirely invalid).

Debug Control – Analyzes properties but not matching logic.

Thus, the two correct tools to address the described issues are:

Refresh Matching (for hierarchy change)

Debug Matching (for failed rule troubleshooting)

References (Exact Extract Source):

Pega Robotics Studio – Matching Diagnostics and Interrogation Guide

Pega Robotics System Architect Training – Debugging and Refresh Matching Modules

Pega Robotics Help – Managing Match Rules in Chrome/Edge/Web Adapters

Final Verified Answer: A, C