PMI PMP Dumps

The project manager should review the project’s environment to understand the organizational culture, because this is part of the plan stakeholder engagement process, which involves identifying the stakeholders, their needs, expectations, interests, and potential impact on the project, and developing appropriate strategies to effectively engage them. The project manager should also use the manage stakeholder engagement process to communicate and collaborate with the stakeholders, and address their issues and concerns.

The other options are not correct because:

• A. Conduct a backlog refinement and identify the key activity to start with. This is not the next step, because the project manager should first review the project’s environment and the stakeholder’s expectations before refining the backlog and prioritizing the activities. Moreover, the backlog refinement is an agile technique that may not be applicable to all projects.
• B. Compare the team’s expertise against the project requirements. This is not the next step, because the project manager should first review the project’s environment and the stakeholder’s expectations before assessing the team’s expertise and identifying any gaps or risks. Moreover, the team’s expertise should have been considered during the acquire resources process, which involves obtaining the necessary human and physical resources for the project.
• C. Perform integration management activities to consolidate the plans. This is not the next step, because the project manager should first review the project’s environment and the stakeholder’s expectations before performing integration management activities, which involve developing, directing, and managing the project work, and ensuring alignment and consistency among the project plans.

The references are:

1: PMP Examination Content Outline - June 2019 - Project Management Institute 2: 180 PMP Practice Questions (2021 Edition) - Academia.edu : A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 13: Project Stakeholder Management : A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 4: Project Integration Management : A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 9: Project Resource Management

The project manager should review the team members’ latest performance, identify gaps in competencies, and decide on the needed trainings, as this is one of the key processes in the Project Resource Management knowledge area. According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should assess the team members’ skills, knowledge, and abilities, and compare them with the project requirements and expectations. The project manager should also identify the areas where the team members need improvement or development, and plan the appropriate trainings or interventions to enhance their competencies and performance. Reviewing the project pipeline, identifying gaps in competencies for execution, and deciding on the needed trainings (A) is not the best option, as it does not consider the individual needs and preferencesof the team members, and may not address the current issues or challenges they are facing. Reviewing the project schedule and the team members’ performance, and deciding on soft skills and related trainings needed for the team © is not sufficient, as it may not cover the technical or functional skills that the team members may also need to perform their tasks effectively. Reviewing the gaps found during project execution, preparing a list of recommended trainings, and discussing it during a team meeting (D) is not advisable, as it may not involve the team members in the decision-making process, and may not reflect their feedback or input. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 313-314, 333-334; PMP Examination Content Outline, pages 9-10, 13-14.

n: The project manager should assess the schedule impact of the deficiencies identified during the factory acceptance test and evaluate the most feasible solution to keep the project on track. This may involve negotiating with the vendor, performing a schedule compression technique, or implementing a contingency plan. The project manager should also communicate the issue and the solution to the relevant stakeholders and update the project documents accordingly. The other options are not advisable, as they may compromise the quality of the product, increase the project risk, or create conflicts with the vendor. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 112-113, 118-119, 122-123.

The project manager should work with the team to understand their views and add the appropriate dependencies and risks before sending the information to the client because this is consistent with the agile principles and values. The agile approach emphasizes collaboration, communication, and feedback among the project team and stakeholders. The project manager should involve the team in the estimation and planning process, as they have the best knowledge and experience of the work to be done. The project manager should also identify and analyze the dependencies and risks that may affect the project scope, schedule, cost, and quality, and communicate them to the client. This will help to establish trust, transparency, and alignment between the project team and the client, and enable them to respond to changes and uncertainties effectively. References:

• A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 2.2.2, page 28
• Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 2.1.1, page 14
• PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain II: Planning, Task 2

 According to the Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials, a project manager should delegate certain authorities and share information to allow fair decision-making when leading a global team that they have worked with in the past and have a high level of trust with them. This is because the project manager needs to balance the need for autonomy and control in a global project environment. By delegating certain authorities, the project manager can empower the team members to make decisions that are appropriate for their local context and time zone, and avoid delays or conflicts due to centralized decision-making. By sharing information, the project manager can ensure that the team members have access to the relevant and accurate data and knowledge that they need to make informed decisions, and also foster transparency and collaboration among the team members. Sharing information can also help the project manager to monitor the progress and performance of the team, and provide feedback and guidance when needed. Delegating certain authorities and sharing information can help the project manager to leverage the trust and experience of the team, and enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the project. References: Project Management Professional (PMP) Exam Content Outline, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) - Seventh Edition, Global projects : how to manage them successfully - Project Teams, [Leadership in Project Management: The Ultimate Guide].

The key activity that is needed to ensure the project’s success is to mitigate the risk of the partner’s system being unavailable by developing alternative plans to make the solution ready and available without full integration capabilities. According to the PMBOK® Guide, risk mitigation is a risk response strategy that involves reducing the probability and/or impact of a negative risk1. In this case, the risk of the partner’s system being unavailable is a negative risk that could affect the project scope, schedule, cost, and quality. Therefore, the project manager should mitigate the risk by developing alternative plans to deliver the solution with partial or no integration with the partner’s system, and to ensure the solution meets the customer needs and expectations. This way, the project manager can minimize the impact of the risk on the project performance and ensure the project’s success. The other options are not the key activities that are needed to ensure the project’s success, as they do not address the need to mitigate the risk.

• Continuously monitoring the risk of the partner system’s unavailability and putting the proper resolution plans in place in case the risk materializes into an actual issue is a necessary but not sufficient activity that does not involve mitigating the risk before it occurs. Monitoring risks is the process of tracking the implementation of risk response plans, identifying and analyzing new risks, and evaluating risk process effectiveness1. Resolution plans are also known as contingency plans or fallback plans, which are implemented only if the risk occurs1. Theseactivities do not reduce the probability and/or impact of the risk, which is the goal of risk mitigation.
• Communicating to the project stakeholders that full integration may not be possible and that the project will potentially be delayed as a result is an important but not sufficient activity that does not involve mitigating the risk before it occurs. Communicating risks is the process of sharing information about risks with the project stakeholders, such as the risk status, progress, and issues1. This activity does not reduce the probability and/or impact of the risk, which is the goal of risk mitigation.
• Eliminating the risk by mandating the partner to change the system settings to facilitate an easier integration with the new solution is an unrealistic and inappropriate activity that does not involve mitigating the risk before it occurs. Eliminating risks is a risk response strategy that involves removing the risk entirely1. In this case, the project manager cannot eliminate the risk by mandating the partner to change the system settings, as the partner may not agree or comply with the request, and the system settings may not be the only cause of the risk. This activity does not reduce the probability and/or impact of the risk, which is the goal of risk mitigation.

References: 1: PMBOK® Guide, 7th edition, pages 97-99.

The project manager should discuss with the client alternative approaches to deliver the minimal viable product (MVP) in 4 months and the rest later. The MVP is a version of the product that has enough features to satisfy the customer’s needs and provide feedback for future development1. This approach can help to meet the client’s urgency and budget, while also allowing the project manager to manage the scope and quality of the product. Calling a meeting with the client to explain that 4 months is not enough time (A) may not be effective or satisfactory, as the client may not accept the project manager’s estimation or rationale. Motivating the team to work more efficiently and approve overtime (B) may not be feasible or desirable, as it may lead to burnout, stress, and reduced quality of the product. Seeking additional resources from subcontractors and other sources (D) may not be possible or beneficial, as it may introduce new risks, costs, and coordination issues to the project. References: 1: Minimum Viable Product (MVP) - Definition and Examples | Aha!

  this question is related to the Project Management Professional (PMP) certification exam, which is a credential that validates the knowledge and skills of project managers. The PMP exam is based on the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, which is a standard that provides a framework and best practices for managing projects. The question describes a situation where a project team consists of eight resources working on a complex project. The chief technical designer prefers to work alone and seldom talks in meetings, but produces good designs. The technical lead is always energetic, has lots of opinions about the project, and constantly clarifies their thoughts in discussions. The question asks what the project manager should do to improve overall team performance.

Based on this information, the best answer is option C, which is to encourage the chief technical designer to engage more with the team. This is because encouraging the chief technical designer to engage more with the team is a team management practice that can help the project manager to enhance the team cohesion, collaboration, and communication. The chief technical designer is a key resource who has valuable expertise and insights on the project. Encouraging the chief technical designer to engage more with the team can help the project manager to leverage the chief technical designer’s knowledge and skills, as well as to foster a positive and productive team culture. Encouraging the chief technical designer to engage more with the team can also help the project manager to address the potential issues or risks that may arise from the chief technical designer’s isolation or detachment, such as misunderstandings, conflicts, or missed opportunities.

Option A, which is to ask the chief technical designer to provide their feedback by email, is not a good answer. This is because asking the chief technical designer to provide their feedback by email may not be enough or effective to improve overall team performance. Email is a tool that can facilitate asynchronous communication, but it may not be suitable or sufficient for complex or interactive discussions. Asking the chief technical designer to provide their feedback by email may not help the project manager to fully utilize the chief technical designer’s potential, as well as to integrate the chief technical designer with the rest of the team. Asking the chief technical designer to provide their feedback by email may also reinforce the chief technical designer’spreference to work alone, which may not be conducive to the team dynamics or the project success.

Option B, which is to let the team dynamics continue as is since the current team mix works well, is not a good answer. This is because letting the team dynamics continue as is may not be optimal or sustainable to improve overall team performance. The team dynamics are the interactions and relationships among the team members that affect the team behavior and outcomes. Letting the team dynamics continue as is may not help the project manager to identify and address the gaps or issues that may exist or emerge in the team, such as the lack of involvement or contribution from the chief technical designer, or the dominance or disruption from the technical lead. Letting the team dynamics continue as is may also prevent the project manager from enhancing and developing the team performance, as well as from adapting to the changing needs and expectations of the project and the stakeholders.

Option D, which is to ask the technical lead to drive the project’s technical discussions, is not a good answer. This is because asking the technical lead to drive the project’s technical discussions may not be appropriate or beneficial to improve overall team performance. The technical lead is a resource who has a high level of energy, opinions, and clarity on the project. Asking the technical lead to drive the project’s technical discussions may not help the project manager to balance the participation and input of all team members, as well as to respect and value the diversity and perspectives of the team. Asking the technical lead to drive the project’s technical discussions may also create or exacerbate the problems or challenges that may affect the team performance, such as the marginalization or alienation of the chief technical designer, or the conflict or resentment among the other team members. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition; PMP Exam Content Outline; PMP Sample Test Questions.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, organizational process assets (OPAs) are the plans, processes, policies, procedures, and knowledge bases specific to and used by the performing organization. OPAs include any artifact, practice, or knowledge from any or all of the organizations involved in the project that can be used to execute or govern the project. OPAs can be grouped into two categories: processes and procedures, and corporate knowledge base. In this question, the project manager is newly assigned to the second phase of an ongoing project. During the implementation, a defect occurred and no one knows how to fix it, as the former engineering team has moved to another project. The customer warns that previously, this defect negatively affected the project schedule. The question asks what the project manager should do first.

Based on this information, the best answer is option B, which is to check the organizational process assets (OPAs). This is because checking the OPAs is a project management practice that can help the project manager to find relevant information and guidance on how to fix the defect and prevent further delays. Checking the OPAs can involve reviewing the processes and procedures, such as the quality management plan, the change management plan, the issue log, the defect repair procedures, and the lessons learned register. Checking the OPAs can also involve accessing the corporate knowledge base, such as the historical information, the project records, the best practices, and the expert judgment. Checking the OPAs can help the project manager to understand the nature and cause of the defect, as well as to identify and implement the appropriate corrective actions.

Option A, which is to acquire knowledgeable resources, is not a good answer. This is because acquiring knowledgeable resources may not be the first step or the best solution for the project manager. Acquiring knowledgeable resources is a process that involves obtaining the human resources needed to complete the project activities. Acquiring knowledgeable resources may involve hiring, contracting, or training processes. Acquiring knowledgeable resources may not be the first step, as it may require some prior analysis and planning. Acquiring knowledgeable resources may not be the best solution, as it may involve additional costs, time, and risks.

Option C, which is to update the risk management plan, is not a good answer. This is because updating the risk management plan may not be relevant or effective for the project manager. The risk management plan is a document that describes how risk management activities will be planned, structured, and performed throughout the project. The risk management plan may include the risk management approach, rolesand responsibilities, budget and schedule, risk categories, risk appetite and tolerance, risk identification and analysis methods, risk response strategies, and risk monitoring and reporting mechanisms. Updating the risk management plan may not be relevant, as the defect is not a risk, but an issue that has already occurred and needs to be resolved. Updating the risk management plan may not be effective, as it may not address the root cause or the impact of the defect.

Option D, which is to extend the timeline of the project, is not a good answer. This is because extending the timeline of the project may not be necessary or acceptable for the project manager. Extending the timeline of the project is a process that involves modifying the project schedule to accommodate the changes or delays in the project activities. Extending the timeline of the project may involve submitting a change request to the appropriate authority for review and approval. Extending the timeline of the project may not be necessary, as the project manager may be able to fix the defect and recover the schedule by using the OPAs. Extending the timeline of the project may not be acceptable, as it may affect the stakeholder satisfaction, business value, and project benefits. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition; PMP Exam Content Outline; [PMP Sample Test Questions].

The communications management plan is a component of the project management plan that describes how project communications will be planned, structured, implemented, and monitored for effectiveness1. It also defines the communication methods, formats, frequency, and stakeholders for each type of communication2. Since the company’s new communication system will introduce a new format and frequency of communication for the executive board, the project manager should update the communications management plan to reflect this change and ensure that the stakeholders’ information needs are met3. References:

• 1: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.1.3.3
• 2: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.3.1
• 3: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.3.3.2

 The schedule performance index (SPI) and the cost performance index (CPI) are earned value management (EVM) measures for project schedule and cost efficiency respectively. SPI and CPI are used to assess the magnitude (or amount) of variation from the established schedule and cost baselines1.

The SPI is calculated by dividing the earned value (EV) by the planned value (PV). The CPI is calculated by dividing the EV by the actual cost (AC). Both indexes have a target value of 1, which means the project is on track. An SPI or CPI less than 1 indicates that the project is behind schedule or over budget, respectively. An SPI or CPI greater than 1 indicates that the project is ahead of schedule or under budget, respectively2.

In this question, the project has an SPI of 0.75 and a CPI of 1.25, which means that the project is behind schedule but under budget. The project manager should report the project status to key stakeholders in a way that shows the project is under control and that corrective actions are being taken to address the schedule variance.

Option A is not the best answer because performing a detailed root cause analysis using pareto charts and fishbone diagrams may be too time-consuming and complex for a monthly status report. The project manager should focus on the key issues and actions, not the details of the analysis.

Option C is not the best answer because preparing a detailed presentation on earned value may be too technical and overwhelming for some stakeholders who are not familiar with EVM. The project manager should use simple and clear language to explain the project status and the implications of the EVM results.

Option D is not the best answer because reporting that the project is not tracking as expected but is still under control may not be convincing or reassuring for the stakeholders. The project manager should provide evidence and rationale for why the project is under control and what steps are being taken to improve the schedule performance.

Option B is the best answer because reporting that the project is behind schedule but that an additional experienced resource can be added to stay within schedule and maintain the budget is a realistic and proactive way to communicate the project status. The project manager acknowledges the schedule problem, proposes a feasible solution, and demonstrates confidence in the project’s ability to meet the budget and the deadline. References:

• 1: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 261
• 2: Schedule & Cost Performance Index, with Formulae & Examples (SPI/CPI)3

According to the PMBOK Guide, a project manager should use interpersonal and team skills to manage team morale and performance. One of the skills is recognition and rewards, which involves acknowledging the team’s achievements, providing positive feedback, and offering incentives for meeting or exceeding expectations. Another skill is coaching and mentoring, which involves providing guidance, support, and advice to help the team members improve their skills, overcome challenges, and achieve their goals. By using these skills, the project manager can motivate the team, foster collaboration, and prevent or resolve conflicts. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 182-183.

According to the PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, the project charter is a document that authorizes the project and defines its high-level scope, objectives, assumptions, constraints, and key stakeholders. The project charter should be approved by the project sponsor and communicated to all relevant stakeholders, including senior managers, to ensure their alignment and commitment to the project. If some of the senior managers claim not to know about the deliverable, it indicates that they may not have been properly informed or involved in the project charter development or approval process. Therefore, the project manager should meetwith these stakeholders to review the project charter and clarify their roles, responsibilities, expectations, and interests in the project. This will help to resolve any confusion or conflict and to gain their support and buy-in for the project. Checking if these stakeholders attend regular project meetings, reviewing the project charter, or validating if the project charter changed are not sufficient actions, as they do not address the root cause of the communication gap or the stakeholder engagement issue, and they may not improve the relationship or trust between the project manager and the senior managers. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 45-46.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 397, a collaborative discussion is a tool and technique for identifying risks in an agile project. A collaborative discussion is a structured conversation among the project team members and other stakeholders to share their knowledge, experience, and perspectives on the project risks. A collaborative discussion can help the project manager to gain an understanding of the risks for an unfamiliar domain, as well as to foster a culture of openness, trust, and transparency among the project participants. A collaborative discussion can also facilitate the generation of creative and innovative ideas for risk response strategies. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 397
• Top 60+ PMP Exam Questions and Answers for 2023 - KnowledgeHut

project manager is facing an escaped defect issue for the project that launched cloud-based agile project management and DevOps training modules via the learning platform. An escaped defect is a defect that is not detected or corrected during the development or testing phase, and reaches the end-users or customers, causing dissatisfaction or harm. The project manager should take immediate action to fix the defect and prevent it from recurring, as well as to communicate with the stakeholders and apologize for the inconvenience. The project manager should also review the quality assurance process and improve the inspection and verification methods. The project manager is not facing a nonconformance issue, an unmet planned-to-done ratio, or an undetected error, as these terms do not describe the situation accurately or completely. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 286, Free PMP Practice Exam Questions - 120 Sample Test Questions

= The project manager should follow the issue management process and log the issue in the issue log. The issue log is a tool for documenting and monitoring the resolution of issues that arise during a project. The project manager should also assign the issue to the appropriate project team member(s) who can resolve it. Closing out the project without ensuring that all stakeholders are satisfied is not a good practice and may lead to customer dissatisfaction, scope creep, or rework. Reporting the issue during the next status meeting or escalating it to the project sponsor and upper management are not the best options, as they may delay the resolution of the issue and increase the risk of project failure. References: (Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials source and documents)

• A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 8: Project Performance, Section 8.2.3: Issue Log
• [PMP Exam Content Outline], Domain II: Process, Task 6: Manage project issues.

The project manager should check to ensure the project outcome aligns with the project charter and statement of work (SOW). This will help to clarify the project scope, objectives, and deliverables, and to resolve any discrepancies or conflicts among the team members from different functional units. Option A is not the best answer becausescheduling a meeting with the stakeholders to determine a consensus regarding the outcome may not be feasible or effective in an agile environment, where the outcome is expected to evolve and adapt to changing customer needs. Option B is not the best answer because inviting the project sponsor to the sprint review to provide clarity on the sprint outcome may not address the underlying issue of the different perspectives among the team members. Option C is not the best answer because asking the product owner to address the concerns about the project outcome during the sprint retrospective may not be appropriate, as the sprint retrospective is mainly focused on improving the team’s processes and performance, not the product outcome. References: PMP Exam Set D – Q63 | Premium PMP Exam Questions

However, I cannot guarantee that this answer is 100% verified or accurate, as it is based on a third-party source and not the official PMI reference materials. Therefore, I suggest you to consult the official PMI website2 or other reliable sources for more information and confirmation. I hope this helps.?

 According to the PMBOK® Guide, project performance reporting is the process of collecting, analyzing, and communicating information on the project progress and status to the project stakeholders. Project performance reporting involves the use of various tools and techniques, such as earned value management (EVM), variance analysis, trend analysis, forecasting, and performance reviews. Project performance reporting helps the project manager and the project team to monitor and control the project performance, identify and resolve issues, manage risks and changes, and implement corrective and preventive actions.

In this question, the project manager has to report the project’s monthly performance to the project steering committee, based on the information provided. The information shows that the actual progress of the project is 2 units, while the planned progress is 3 units. This means that the project is behind schedule, and has not achieved the expected level of work completion. The information also shows that the actual cost of the project is 2 units, while the budgeted cost is 3 units. This means that the project is under the planned expenditure, and has spent less than the expected amount of money. The project manager should use EVM to calculate the schedule variance (SV) and the cost variance (CV) of the project, and compare them with the baseline values. The SV is the difference between the earned value (EV) and the planned value (PV) of the project, and indicates how much ahead or behind schedule the project is. The CV is the difference between the EV and the actual cost (AC) of the project, and indicates how much over or under budget the project is. The EV is the value of the work actually performed by the project. Based on the information given, the EV can be calculated as follows:

EV = (AC / PV) x PV = (2 / 3) x 3 = 2 units

The SV and CV can then be calculated as follows:

SV = EV - PV = 2 - 3 = -1 unit

CV = EV - AC = 2 - 2 = 0 unit

The negative SV indicates that the project is behind schedule, and the zero CV indicates that the project is on budget. The project manager should report these values to the project steering committee, and explain the reasons and impacts of the schedule variance. The project manager should also report the actions taken or planned to expedite the delayed activities, and to bring the project back on track. The project manager should not claim that the project has a cost savings, as this may not reflect the true value of the project, and may not compensate for the schedule delay. The project manager should also not suggest that no further actions should be taken, as this may imply a lack of concern or responsibility for the project performance.

Therefore, the best statement that the project manager should make to the project steering committee is:

C. The project is currently behind schedule with a corresponding lower cost, and every effort is being made to expedite the delayed activities.

References:

• PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, pages 260-261, 267-268, 333-334
• Project Performance Reporting: Key Performance Reports
• Project Management Tools & Templates
• ProjectManagement.com - PMO Monthly Status Report
• How to Write an Effective Monthly Report [+ Templates]
• Project Management Monthly Reporting Procedure & Formats

= The risk management plan is the document that describes how the project team will manage risks throughout the project life cycle. It includes information such as the risk management processes, roles and responsibilities, risk categories, risk tolerance, risk reporting, and risk review frequency. The project manager should check the risk management plan first to determine how often the risks are being reviewed, as this is part of the risk monitoring and control process. The other documents are outputs of the risk management process, but they do not specify the frequency of risk reviews. References: = Project Management Professional (PMP) Exam Content Outline, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Sixth Edition, Tried and true methods in managing project risks and issues

When a project involves team members from different organizations, cultures, or backgrounds, there may be conflicts due to different expectations, preferences, or assumptions about the project processes1. The project manager should not impose, avoid, or ignore these conflicts, as this could lead to resentment, confusion, or poor performance2. The project manager should instead work with the team to analyze which processes are suitable to use for the project, considering the project objectives, requirements, constraints, and risks3. The project manager should also define the agreed-upon processes in the ground rules, which are the standards of behavior and communication that the team members follow to work effectively together4. The ground rules can help the team members understand their roles and responsibilities, respect each other’s differences, and resolve any issues that may arise. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 27 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 339 3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 38 4: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 333 : PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 334

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, one of the key principles for project delivery is to “tailor the delivery approach based on context” (p. 11). This principle implies that the project manager should adapt the processes and practices to suit the specific needs and characteristics of the project, rather than following a rigid or predefined methodology. The project manager should review and amend the processes to ensure only value-adding activities are present, as this will help to eliminate waste, optimize efficiency, and improve performance. Reviewing the resources, updating the variation register, or updating the schedule are not effective ways to handle the situation, as they do not address the root cause of the problem, which is the misalignment between the processes and the project context. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, p. 11; PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain II: Process, Task 2.

 According to the PMBOK® Guide 7th Edition, the project manager should facilitate the creation of a team charter that defines the team’s vision, values, norms, and working agreements. The team charter helps the team to align on the project purpose, goals, and expectations, and to resolve any conflicts or issues that may arise during the project. Therefore, the project manager should establish a team charter with the team members to agree on the daily meeting times and other aspects of the team collaboration. Option A is incorrect because it implies that the project manager is imposing a rigid schedule on the team, which goes against the agile principles of flexibility and adaptation. Option B is incorrect because it suggests that the project manager is delegating the responsibility of resolving the team conflicts to a team leader, which could undermine the team’s self-organization and empowerment. Option C is incorrect because it indicates that the project manager is ignoring the team’s disagreements and focusing only on their achievements, which could lead to unresolved issues and dissatisfaction. References: PMBOK® Guide 7th Edition, Chapter 2: Creating a High-Performing Team, Section 2.1: Establishing a Team, p. 29-30.

The project manager should ask the team member to provide details to address the issue with the vendor, as this is one of the best practices for managing external dependencies in an agile project. According to the Agile Practice Guide, the project manager should collaborate with the team members and the vendors to identify, monitor, and resolve any issues or risks that may affect the project delivery. The project manager should also establish clear and frequent communication channels with the vendors and ensure that they are aligned with the project vision, goals, and expectations. Implementing fast tracking to reduce the impact of the delay on the sprint (A) is not a good option, as it may increase the risk and complexity of the project and compromise the quality and value of the deliverables. Updating the communications management plan to prevent future reoccurrence © is not enough, as it does not address the current issue and the possible solutions. Asking the team member to resolve the issue independently to minimize further delays (D) is not advisable, as it may create silos and conflicts within the team and with the vendor, and reduce the collaboration and transparency that are essential for agile project management. References: Agile Practice Guide, pages 43-44, 77-78; PMP Examination Content Outline, pages 9-10, 13-14.

 = The project manager should determine cross-dependencies and plan a spike in the next sprint to investigate the causes of the delay and find possible solutions. A spike is a time-boxed activity that allows the team to explore a complex problem or learn a new skill1. The project manager should also determine the risks and identify a resolution during the retrospective meeting, which is a regular event that enables the team to reflect on their performance and improve their processes2. These actions will help the project manager to address the issues that are affecting the delivery of the user stories and ensure the quality of the product. References: = PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, Chapter 5: Delivery Performance, Section 5.2.3: Plan and Manage Iterations; PMBOK Guide 6th Edition, Chapter 6: Project Schedule Management, Section 6.2.2.5: Agile Release Planning.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should manage the project scope, including the planning, validation, and control of the scope. The project manager should also manage the project changes, including the initiation, evaluation, approval, and implementationof the changes. In this scenario, the project manager received a request to add additional changes 1 day before the planned change date. This is a potential change to the project scope that may also impact the project time, cost, quality, and other aspects. The best course of action is to review the additional changes and perform integrated change control. This can help the project manager to assess the feasibility and desirability of the change request, and to determine the appropriate response and approval. Reviewing the additional changes and performing integrated change control (option C) is the best solution to the issue, as it demonstrates proactive and effective project scope and change management. Rejecting the changes as the lead time is too short (option A) may not be feasible or ethical, as it may violate the customer’s expectations and satisfaction, and may damage the trust and relationship with the customer. Determining whether the project team is capable of making the changes (option B) may not be sufficient or realistic, as it may ignore or overlook the impact and value of the change request, and may create a conflict or resentment among the project team. Checking if the changes are covered in the statement of work (SOW) (option D) may not be relevant or helpful, as it may not address the change request itself, nor does it account for the possible deviations or changes that may occur during the project execution. References: : Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (6th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author1 : Change Request - Project Management Knowledge2 : Managing Change Requests in Project Management [Template]3 : Which Project Documents Need A Change Request For Updates?4

 According to the PMBOK® Guide, return of investment (ROI) is a financial analysis technique that calculates the ratio of the net benefits to the total costs of a project or an investment. ROI helps to evaluate the profitability and feasibility of a project or an investment by comparing the expected benefits with the required costs. A higher ROI indicates that the project is more profitable and worth pursuing, while a lower ROI indicates that the project is less profitable and should be rejected. ROI can also be used to compare different project options and select the one that has the highest ROI, as it represents the most value for the organization.

In this question, the project manager is preparing the business case for a project in a not for profit organization. The project manager justifies the cost of the project to a group of sponsors. The business case is a document that describes the rationale and justification for initiating a project or an investment, and how it aligns with the organizational strategy, objectives, and values. The business case also includes the expected benefits and costs of the project or the investment, and the analysis and evaluation of the alternatives and options. The business case helps the project manager and the sponsors to make informed decisions about the project initiation and selection.

To justify the cost of the project, the project manager should use ROI as a benefits realization metric. Benefits realization is the process of identifying, planning, managing, and measuring the benefits and value that a project or an investment delivers to the organization and the stakeholders. Benefits realization metrics are tools and techniques that help to quantify and evaluate the benefits and value of a project or an investment, and to compare them with the baseline values. ROI is a common and widely used benefits realization metric, as it helps to demonstrate the financial value and impact of a project or an investment, and to justify its cost and feasibility. ROI can be calculated as follows:

ROI = (Net Benefits / Total Costs) x 100%

Net Benefits = Total Benefits - Total Costs

Total Benefits = The sum of all the monetary and non-monetary benefits that the project or the investment will generate over its life cycle.

Total Costs = The sum of all the monetary and non-monetary costs that the project or the investment will incur over its life cycle.

The project manager should estimate the total benefits and costs of the project, and calculate the net benefits and the ROI. The project manager should also compare the ROI of the project with the ROI of the other alternatives or options, and select the one that has the highest ROI. The project manager should present the ROI of the project to the sponsors, and explain how it reflects the value and benefit of the project, and how it outweighs the cost of the project.

The other options are not correct because they do not provide a valid benefits realization metric to justify the cost of the project. Option A is wrong because it refers to the total value of ownership, which is a concept that considers the total costs and benefits of owning and using a product, service, or asset over its life cycle. It is not a benefits realization metric, but rather a way of estimating the total benefits and costs of a project or an investment. Option B is wrong because it refers to the budget at completion (BAC), which is the total amount of money that is planned to be spent on a project or a work breakdown structure component. It is not a benefits realization metric, but rather a cost baseline value that is used to measure and control the project cost performance. Option C is wrong because it refers to the payback period, which is a financial analysis technique that calculates the time required to recover the initial investment of a project or an investment. It is not a sufficient benefits realization metric, as it does not consider the benefits and costs after the payback period, the time value of money, or the profitability of the project or the investment. References:

• PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, pages 33-34, 333-334, 440-441
• Return on Investment (ROI) - Project Management Knowledge
• Return on Investment (ROI) - Project Management Institute
• Benefits Realization Management: A Practice Guide | PMI
• Benefits Realization Management - ProjectEngineer

According to the Agile Practice Guide, agile project management is an iterative approach to delivering a project throughout its life cycle. Agile projects embrace change and value customer feedback, but they also need to manage the impact of change on the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, and risk. One of the tools and techniques for managing change in agile projects is impact analysis, which involves assessing the effect of a change request on the project objectives and deliverables. The project manager should perform an impact analysis on the schedule and budget based on the additional scope requested by the executive steering committee, and communicate the results to the relevant stakeholders. This will help the project manager to determine the feasibility and desirability of the change, and to negotiate the best course of action with the executive steering committee and the project team. References:

• Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 5: Implementing Agile: Creating an Agile Environment, pp. 77-97.
• PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, Chapter 4: Project Integration Management, pp. 111-158.
• PMP Exam Prep Coursebook, Chapter 4: Project Integration Management, pp. 4-1 - 4-24.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager is responsible for managing the project team by tracking team member performance, providing feedback, resolving issues, and managing team changes. One of the tools and techniques for managing the project team is interpersonal and team skills, which include conflict management, negotiation, and emotional intelligence. In this scenario, a key team member informs the project manager that they have been accepted to a master’s degree program, which will coincide with the last phase of the project. This may create a potential conflict between the team member’s personal and professional goals, and affect the project performance. The best way to handle this situation is to assess the team member’s commitment to the master’s program and its impact on project performance, using interpersonal and team skills. This option allows the project manager to understand the team member’s perspective, evaluate the risks and benefits of the situation, and negotiate a mutually acceptable solution that balances the team member’s needs and the project’s objectives. Asking the team member to inform HR, delegate some of their tasks, or postpone their enrollment are not the best options, as they do not address the underlying conflict, or respect the team member’s autonomy and career aspirations. These options may also create resentment, demotivation, or turnover among the team member, which can negatively affect the project performance. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 217-218, 9.6 Manage Team.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, an assumption log is a project document that records the assumptions and constraints that affect the project planning and execution. The assumption log helps to identify, validate, and monitor the assumptions and constraints throughout the project life cycle, and to address any deviations or changes that may occur. The assumption log also helps to communicate the assumptions and constraints to the project stakeholders, and to manage their expectations and feedback. In this scenario, the project manager faces a fixed-cost contract that defines the scope and final delivery date of the project, but also several internal constraints and conditions that may prevent the project from being completed as planned. The best course of action is to create an assumption log and map the assumptions to the impediments based on the impact to the project value. This can help the project manager to assess the validity and reliability of the assumptions, to identify and prioritize the impediments that may affect the project performance and delivery, and to develop appropriate strategies and actions to mitigate or resolve them. Creating an assumption log and mapping assumptions to impediments based on the impact to the project value (option B) is the best solution to the issue, as it demonstrates proactive and effective project integration and risk management. Creating a contingency plan in case the project deviates from the initial plan (option A) may also be helpful, but it is not the first step that the project manager should take. A contingency plan is a predefined action plan that specifies the steps to be taken if an identified risk event occurs. Before creating a contingency plan, the project manager should first identify and analyze the assumptions and impediments that may cause the project deviation, and determine the probability and impact of the risk events. Creating an issue log template that will be used to identify and track impediments (option C) may also be useful, but it is not the most comprehensive or effective approach. An issue log is a project document that records and monitors the issues that arise during the project and require resolution. However, an issue log does not capture the assumptions and constraints that underlie the issues, nor does it provide a clear mapping of the assumptions to the impediments based on the impact to the project value. Creating a schedule management plan to ensure the project meets the delivery date (option D) may also be necessary, but it is not the most urgent or relevant action. A schedule management plan is a component of the project management plan that establishes the policies, procedures, and documentation for planning, developing, managing, executing, and controlling the project schedule. However, a schedule management plan does not address the assumptions andimpediments that may affect the project scope and value, nor does it account for the fixed-cost contract that limits the flexibility and adaptability of the project schedule. References: : Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (6th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author1 : Project Management Institute. (2017). Agile Practice Guide. Newtown Square, PA: Author2 : The special challenges of project management under fixed-price contracts. (2015)3 : Fixed price agile projects. (2011)2 : Managing Fixed Price Contracts. (2009)3

 The product backlog is a prioritized list of features and requirements that the project team needs to deliver. The iteration backlog is a subset of the product backlog that the team commits to complete in a given iteration. Adding a feature that is not part of the MVP to the iteration backlog can disrupt the team’s workflow and compromise the quality of the deliverables. Therefore, the project manager should ensure that the feature is added to the product backlog, explain to the sponsor the impact of the request on the team’s performance and the project schedule, and ask the team to include the feature’s tasks in the next iteration, after they have completed the current iteration’s tasks. This way, the project manager can balance the sponsor’s expectations and the team’s capacity, while maintaining the project’s scope and quality. References: PMBOK Guide, PMI Study Hall, PMP Question Bank

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 128-129, 132-133 :

= The project manager should adjust their responsibilities accordingly by becoming a servant leader by supporting team collaboration and removing impediments when implementing a hybrid approach that will replace a predictive approach on an upcoming project. According to the PMBOK® Guide, a hybrid approach is a project management approach that combines predictive and adaptive (agile) practices to fit the project context, complexity, and uncertainty[1]. A hybrid approach requires the project manager to balance the need for planning and control with the need for flexibility and responsiveness to changing customer needs and expectations[1]. Therefore, the project manager should adopt a servant leadership style, which is a leadership style that focuses on empowering and serving the team rather than directing and controlling them[1]. A servant leader supports team collaboration by facilitating communication, feedback, and decision making among the team members and other stakeholders[1]. A servant leader also removes impediments by identifying and resolving issues that prevent the team from delivering value to the customer[1]. By becoming a servant leader, the project manager can enhance the team performance and satisfaction, and deliver customer value in a hybrid approach. The other options are not appropriate for this situation, as they do not reflect the role of the project manager in a hybrid approach.

• Introducing new communication tools to the project team members is a possible action that the project manager can take, but it is not the main responsibility of the project manager in a hybrid approach. Communication tools are only effective if they are used to support team collaboration and customer feedback, which are the core values of a hybrid approach[1].
• Requesting a scrum master to focus on the collaboration while the project manager focuses on the coordination is a wrong way to implement a hybrid approach, as it creates a role conflict and a lack of alignment between the project manager and the scrum master. A scrum master is a role in an agile framework that coaches and guides the team and the product owner in applying agile principles and practices[1]. Ascrum master is not a substitute for the project manager, nor is the project manager a superior to the scrum master. In a hybrid approach, the project manager and the scrum master should work together to ensure the project objectives and customer expectations are met, and to share the responsibilities of collaboration and coordination[1].
• Delegating coordination activities to the product owner so the project manager can focus on managing collaboration is a wrong way to implement a hybrid approach, as it creates a role overload and a lack of accountability for the product owner. A product owner is a role in an agile framework that represents the voice of the customer and defines and prioritizes the product backlog[1]. A product owner is not responsible for coordinating the project activities, resources, and stakeholders, which are the primary functions of the project manager. In a hybrid approach, the project manager and the product owner should work together to ensure the product vision and scope are aligned with the project goals and constraints, and to share the responsibilities of collaboration and coordination[1].

References: [1]: PMBOK® Guide, 7th edition, pages 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53…

= The project manager should tell the team member to route the request through the project manager, as this is the best way to ensure that the communication is consistent, accurate, and aligned with the project objectives. The project manager is responsible for managing the communication with the stakeholders, including the executive, and for providing them with the appropriate level of information. The project manager should also verify the validity and feasibility of the request, and update the communications management plan accordingly. The other options are not the best actions to take in this situation, as they do not follow the established communication protocols or respect the project manager’s authority. References: = A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 5: Project Communications, Section 5.2: Manage Communications, Page 137-138.

According to the PMBOK® Guide, agile is an iterative, incremental, and adaptive approach to project management that values customer collaboration, feedback, and responsiveness to change. Agile projects deliver working software in small increments called iterations or sprints, and involve frequent communication and collaboration among the project team and the stakeholders. Agile projects also emphasize the importance of delivering value to the customer and meeting their needs and expectations.

In this question, the project manager is working on an agile project that is approaching its first release date, and the product will be supported by the operations team. The operations team is responsible for maintaining and operating the product after it is delivered to the customer, and ensuring its availability, reliability, and performance. To ensure proper support for the product, the project manager should take the following action:

• Ensure the operations team has representation in the planning and review meetings and that there are support requirements in the backlog. The project manager should involve the operations team as a key stakeholder in the agile project, and ensure that they have a voice and a role in the planning and review meetings. The planning meetings are used to define and prioritize the product backlog, which is a list of features and requirements that the product should deliver. The review meetings are used to inspect and evaluate the product increment, which is the sum of all the product backlog items completed during a sprint. The project manager should ensure that the operations team has representation in these meetings, and that they can provide their input, feedback, and expectations for the product. The project manager should also ensure that there are support requirements in the product backlog, such as documentation, training, testing, deployment, etc., and that they are prioritized and delivered along with the product features. This will help to ensure the quality and usability of the product, and to facilitate the knowledge transfer and handover to the operations team.

The other options are not correct because they do not provide a valid way to ensure proper support for the product. Option A is wrong because it suggests that the projectmanager should engage an external consultancy to assemble supporting documents and coordinate the knowledge transfer, without involving the operations team in the agile project. This would be costly, inefficient, and ineffective, as it may not reflect the actual needs and expectations of the operations team, and may create a gap or a delay in the communication and collaboration. Option B is wrong because it implies that the project manager should create and prioritize a support manual on the product backlog, without ensuring the representation of the operations team in the planning and review meetings. This would be incomplete, inaccurate, and insufficient, as it may not capture the full scope and depth of the support requirements, and may not allow the operations team to inspect and evaluate the product increment. Option D is wrong because it assumes that the project manager should propose a workshop with the operations team to outline all requirements of the new software and how to properly support it, without ensuring that there are support requirements in the product backlog. This would be inconsistent, redundant, and risky, as it may not align with the agile principles and practices, and may not ensure the delivery and validation of the support requirements along with the product features. References:

• PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, pages 206-207, 540-541
• Agile Project Management Course (Google) | Coursera
• Agile Certified Practitioner | PMI - Project Management Institute
• Agile Certifications | PMI - Project Management Institute

This question is about managing an agile team when a team member leaves the project temporarily due to some urgent personal issues. In such a situation, the project manager should follow the agile principles and values, such as collaboration, self-organization, and customer satisfaction. Therefore, the best option is to reach an agreement with the team on how to handle the situation. The project manager should communicate with the team and the team member who is leaving, and facilitate a discussion on how to redistribute the tasks, adjust the scope, or reprioritize the backlog. The project manager should also support the team in finding the best solutions, such as cross-training, mentoring, or pairing. The project manager should also monitor and control the project performance and the team morale, as well as communicate the progress and the issues to the relevant stakeholders. The other options are not consistent with the agile principles and values, as they may compromise the quality, functionality, or value of the product, or the trust, respect, or empowerment of the team. Convincing the team member not to leave until the project is completed may not be realistic or ethical, as the team member may have a valid reason to leave, or it may affect their personal or professional well-being. Reaching out to the procurement team to hire a substitute for the team member may not be feasible or beneficial, as it may increase the cost, risk, or complexity of the project, or it may disrupt the team dynamics or the sprint rhythm. Allowing senior management to decide how to proceed with the project may not be necessary or effective, as the senior management may not have the authority or the expertise to make the best decisions for the project, or it may undermine the team’s autonomy or accountability. References:

• PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Project Management Institute Inc., 2017, pp. 28-29, 35-36, 54-55, 487.
• What to do when capacity is reduced in the middle of the Sprint? (e.g. Sick Leave), Project Management Stack Exchange, 2018, pp. 1-2.
• Are You Handling a Team Member Leaving Your Project Properly?, Online PM Courses, 2017, pp. 1-2, 4-5.
• Four things you should do whenever someone leaves your project, Planview Blog, 2018, p. 1.
• How to save your project when a key team member leaves, Futuramo Blog, 2017, p. 1.

The project manager should choose emotional intelligence training for their team to help them deal with the difficult stakeholder. Emotional intelligence is the ability to recognize and manage one’s own emotions and the emotions of others1. It can help the team to cope with stress, communicate effectively, empathize with others, overcome challenges, and resolve conflicts2. By improving their emotional intelligence, the team can reduce the negative impact of the stakeholder’s behavior and enhance their performance and satisfaction. References: = PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, Chapter 4: Team Performance, Section 4.2.2: Develop Team Members and Stakeholders; PMBOK Guide 6th Edition, Chapter 9: Project Resource Management, Section 9.5.2.1: Interpersonal and Team Skills.

= According to the Agile Practice Guide, fixed-price increments are a type of contract that can be used for agile projects, where the scope and price are agreed for each increment or iteration1. This allows the customer and the vendor to have more flexibility and transparency in defining and delivering the requirements, as well as managing the risks and changes2. Therefore, the project manager should use fixed-price increments as user stories are completed, to ensure that the vendor is paid for the value delivered, and that the project manager can control the finances while delivering results. This is also consistent with the agile principle of delivering working software frequently and satisfying the customer through early and continuous delivery of valuable software3. References:

• 1: Agile Practice Guide, p. 48
• 2: Agile Practice Guide, p. 49
• 3: Agile Practice Guide, p. 9

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager is responsible for developing the project team by improving their competencies, interactions, and overall performance. One of the tools and techniques for developing the project team is training, which involves providing learning opportunities to acquire new skills or enhance existing ones. Training can be formal or informal, and can be delivered by internal or external sources. In this scenario, the agile project team received an assignment to develop an industrial system that interfaces with robots, which is a new type of work for them. The team members are interested in acquiring such expertise, but it may result in a project delay. The best way to handle this situation is to add an experienced professional to the team to reinforce knowledge sharing and help grow team expertise in the new product. This option provides an informal and internal source of training for the team, as well as a mentor who can guide them through the challenges and complexities of the newtechnology. This can help the team learn faster, improve their performance, and deliver a high-quality product. Creating a separate team, using a robotics vendor company, or hiring a consulting company are not the best options, as they do not address the team’s interest in acquiring new expertise, or the project manager’s responsibility to develop the team. These options may also introduce additional risks, costs, or coordination issues to the project. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 215-216, 9.5 Develop Team.

The project manager should spend a short amount of time defining the scope and building prototypes to refine the requirements for the new agile project. This way, the project manager can embrace the agile principle of delivering value early and often, and responding to changes in customer needs and expectations. The project manager can also use the prototypes to solicit feedback from the stakeholders and incorporate them into the next iteration of the product. The project manager should not create a scope baseline, estimate the work and story sizes, or develop a plan to complete more work in less time, as these are more suitable for predictive projects thathave fixed scope and requirements. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 177, Top 20 PMP Sample Question and Answer For 2023 | StarAgile

According to the PMBOK Guide, a project manager should manage the transition of the project deliverables to the operations team and ensure that they have the necessary skills andknowledge to support the new system. A project using a hybrid approach to migrate from a current system to a new and enhanced system in stages should include knowledge transfer sessions between the project and operations team at every stage. This can help the operations team to understand the features, functions, and benefits of the new system, as well as the potential issues, risks, and changes that may arise during the migration. This can also help the project team to obtain feedback, validation, and acceptance from the operations team. Including knowledge transfer sessions is the best option, as it can improve the readiness, confidence, and satisfaction of the operations team. Creating a lessons learned register, changing the project management plan, or preparing detailed documentation are not the best options, as they do not address the immediate concern of the operations team and may not provide enough information or interaction to ensure a smooth transition. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 214-215, 218-219.

The PMO should implement a better way to report the project’s health by using earned value management (EVM) techniques that can integrate the traditional and agile approaches. EVM can provide objective and quantitative measures of project performance, such as schedule variance (SV), cost variance (CV), schedule performance index (SPI), and cost performance index (CPI). These metrics can help the PMO and upper management to monitor the project progress and cost, as well as to forecast the project completion time and budget. EVM can also be adapted to agile projects by using agile progress as an input, such as story points, backlog items, or iterations. This way, the PMO can report the project’s health in a consistent and transparent manner that aligns with the expectations of upper management. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 261-262, Top 60+ PMP Exam Questions and Answers for 2023 - KnowledgeHut

The resource management plan is a component of the project management plan that describes how the project resources are acquired, allocated, monitored, and controlled. It also defines the roles and responsibilities of the project team members and the reporting structure. The resource management plan is an important input for managing project resources and resolving resource conflicts. If the project manager faces a situation where some key resources are not available for the project, he or she should consult the resource management plan and escalate the issue to the sponsor or other appropriate stakeholders. The sponsor can help the project manager negotiate with the functional managers or other resource providers to secure the required resources for the project. The sponsor can also authorize changes to the project scope,schedule, or budget to accommodate the resource constraints. The other options are not appropriate because they do not address the root cause of the problem and may lead to further delays or risks for the project. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 9.1.3.1, page 309; PMI, PMP Exam Content Outline, 2021, Domain II: Process, Task 5.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 123, the project manager is responsible for managing the project schedule and ensuring that the project deliverables are completed within the agreed time frame. If the project manager observes that an approaching deadline is likely to be missed because of some delays on the project due to a lack of resources, the project manager should follow the schedule management process, which involves monitoring and controlling the project progress, identifying and analyzing any variances or issues, and implementing corrective or preventive actions as needed. The project manager should organize a team meeting to discuss the next course of action, as this is a tool and technique for schedule control, which involves engaging the project team members and other stakeholders to review the project status, identify the root causes of the delays, evaluate the impact on the project objectives and constraints, and propose and agree on the best solutions to recover the schedule. The project manager should not escalate the issue to the sponsor, as this may imply that the project manager is unable to handle the situation. The project manager should not review the risk management plan, as this may not address the current issue of the schedule delay. The project manager should not review the milestone list, as this may not provide enough information or guidance on how to resolve the issue. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 123
• Free PMP Practice Exam Questions - 120 Sample Test Questions

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should use appropriate conflict resolution techniques to minimize the negative effects of conflict and enhance project performance. The project manager should also consider the emotional and interpersonal aspects of conflict and facilitate constructive dialogue between the parties involved. Sending both team members to the HR department (option A) may not be the best solution, as it may imply that the project manager is unable to handle the conflict and may damage the trust and morale of the team. Understanding each team member’s argument and selecting the one that results in less risk to the project (option B) may also be problematic, as it may create a win-lose situation and increase the resentment and frustration of the losing party. Offering a compromise that is acceptable to both team members, even if it may not be the best solution (option D) may also be suboptimal, as it may result in a lose-lose situation and reduce the quality and effectiveness of the project outcome. Helping the team members to resolve the conflict in a way that results in the best team performance (option C) is the most desirable option, as it may lead to a win-win situation and foster collaboration and innovation among the team members. References: : Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (6th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author.

 According to the PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, a change request is any request to modify the agreed-upon project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or other project baselines. A change request can be initiated by any stakeholder at any stage of the project, and it should be evaluated for its impact on the project objectives and constraints. Therefore, the project manager should perform a detailed assessment to analyze the impact of the change request on the product feature, the critical path, and other project aspects, such as risk, quality, and stakeholder satisfaction. This will help the project manager to determine the feasibility, desirability, and priority of the change request, and to propose the best course of action to the change control board. Rejecting the change request, using schedule compression methods, or initiating a risk response strategy are not appropriate actions, as they do not address the root cause of the change request, the needs and expectations of the key stakeholder, or the potential benefits or drawbacks of the change request for the project outcome. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 141-142.

The project manager should develop a training plan for all of the stakeholders to learn about the updates after the documents are completed. This way, the project manager can ensure that the new project management procedures and templates are understood and applied correctly by the project teams and other relevant parties. The project manager can also use the training plan to communicate the benefits and rationale of the updates, as well as to address any questions or concerns that the stakeholders may have. The project manager should not hire an external consultant, upload the files to the corporate website, or meet with the department managers without providing adequate training and guidance on the new procedures and templates. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 39, Top 20+ PMP Exam Questions and Answers: 2023 | Henry Harvin

 This answer is based on the best practice of involving the stakeholders in the project as early as possible, especially during the transition and closing phase. By engaging the operations support team in the early release, the project manager can ensure that they are familiar with the project deliverables, requirements, and acceptance criteria. This will also help to identify and resolve any issues or gaps before the final transition and closure. This approach will reduce the transition risk and increase the likelihood of project acceptance by the operations support team. References: (Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials source and documents)

• A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 8: Delivering Outcomes, Section 8.3: Transitioning Outcomes, page 194.
• The Standard for Project Management, Part 2: Value Delivery System, Section 2.5: Project Closure, page 67.

According to the Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials, the project manager should speak with the team member directly to reinforce the ground rules when one of the team members is always late to the daily standup meeting. This is because the daily standup meeting is a crucial tool for agile teams to synchronize their work, share progress, identify impediments, and collaborate effectively. The daily standup meeting requires the participation and commitment of all team members, and it should be held at the same time every day. If a team member is consistently late to the meeting, it can disrupt the flow of the meeting, affect the morale of the team, and reduce the value of the meeting. Therefore, the project manager should address the issue with the team member individually, and remind them of the importance and expectations of the daily standup meeting. The project manager should also try to understand the reasons for the team member’s tardiness, and offer support or solutions if needed. The project manager should avoid blaming or shaming the team member, and instead focus on the positive outcomes of attending the meeting on time. By speaking with the team member directly, the project manager can resolve the issue in a respectful andconstructive way, and improve the team’s performance and satisfaction. References: Project Management Professional (PMP) Exam Content Outline, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) - Seventh Edition, Daily Standup Meetings: Everything You Should Know, [Is Your Coworker Always Late to Meetings? What To Do].

= The minimum viable product (MVP) is a version of a product that has just enough features to satisfy early customers and provide feedback for future development. If the customer does not perceive business value in the products delivered, the project manager should review the definition of the MVP to ensure that it aligns with the customer’s expectations and needs. Changing the delivery project approach, performing a cost-benefit analysis, or reviewing the risk analysis are not likely to address the root cause of the customer’s dissatisfaction. References: PMI Study Hall, [PMBOK Guide]

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 176 :

 = The project manager should address this situation by determining the communication needs, environment, and tools to get the message across. This is because the root cause of the problem is the lack of effective communication between the local and remote teams. The project manager should identify the stakeholders, their information needs, the communication methods, the frequency, the format, and the feedback mechanisms to ensure that the requirements are clearly understood and agreed upon by both teams. The project manager should also consider the cultural, linguistic, and technological differences that may affect the communication process and use appropriate tools and techniques to overcome them.

• Option A is not a good action, as reviewing lessons learned from previous projects and OPAs may not provide relevant or useful information for the current situation. The project manager should focus on the current communication issues and not rely on past experiences that may not be applicable or effective.
• Option B is not a good action, as evaluating and reassigning the developing tasks to a local vendor who has worked on previous projects may not be feasible or desirable. It may also create additional costs, risks, and delays for the project. The project manager should try to resolve the communication issues with the existing remote team and not change the project scope or resources without proper justification and approval.
• Option D is not a good action, as documenting the risk in the risk management plan and using contingency reserves to hire a local vendor is a reactive and costly approach. The project manager should try to prevent or mitigate the risk of communication failure and not wait until it becomes an issue that requires corrective action. The project manager should also not use the contingency reserves for planned changes that are not related to unforeseen events or risks. References:
• [PMBOK Guide], 6th edition, page 368, section 10.1
• [Agile Practice Guide], page 27, section 2.4.1
• [PMP Exam Content Outline], page 10, task 5 under domain 2

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, the project manager should engage stakeholders to understand their needs and expectations, and to manage changes that may affect the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or benefits1. In this case, the missing regulatory feature is a change that may have significant impact on the project objectives and constraints, especially the fixed release date. Therefore, the project manager should invite stakeholders to discuss the impact of adding the feature, and to agree on the best way to handle it, such as reprioritizing the backlog, adjusting the iteration length, or negotiating the release date. This is also consistent with the agile principle of customer collaboration over contract negotiation2. References:

• 1: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 3: Engage Stakeholders, p. 51-52
• 2: Agile Practice Guide, p. 9

The project manager should acknowledge the stakeholders’ concerns with open dialogues and realign the project with stakeholder requirements and past lessons learned, as this is one of the key processes in the Project Stakeholder Management knowledge area. According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should engage the stakeholders throughout the project life cycle, and address their needs, expectations, and issues. The project manager should also use effective communication and collaboration techniques to build trust and rapport with the stakeholders, and to manage their expectations and influence. The project manager should also review the project scope, objectives, and deliverables with the stakeholders, and ensure that they are aligned with the project vision and goals. The project manager should also leverage any available historical information and lessons learned from previous or similar projects, and apply them to the current project. Soliciting a larger reserve for cost and time and managing the stakeholders’ expectations (B) is not the best option, as it may not address the root cause of the problem, which is the lack of proper records and information for the original product. Sharing the threats of not updating old solutions and asking stakeholders to be patient with any inconveniences © is not a good strategy, as it may create resistance and conflict among the stakeholders, and reduce their trust and support for the project. Creating a plan to inform stakeholders on the progress so they are able to see that the project can succeed (D) is not enough, as it does not involve the stakeholders in the decision-making and planning processes, and may not reflect their feedback or input. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 513-514, 529-530; PMP Examination Content Outline, pages 9-10, 13-14.

The cost management plan is a component of the project management plan that describes how the project costs will be planned, estimated, budgeted, managed, and controlled. It also defines the processes, roles, responsibilities, tools, and techniques for cost management, as well as the thresholds, rules, and procedures for handling changes and variances. Therefore, the project manager should review the cost management plan to determine how to address the issue of obsolete equipment that could affect the next iteration of the project. The cost management plan can help the project manager to identify the available resources, reserves, and funding options, as well as the steps and criteria for submitting and approving a change request, if needed. The other options are not as appropriate or effective as reviewing the cost management plan, as they may not follow the established guidelines or consider the impact of the issue on the project objectives and constraints. Checking the project budget to verify if there is enough contingency reserve may not be sufficient or accurate, as the contingency reserve may not cover the cost of buying new equipment, or it may be allocated for other risks or uncertainties. Telling the team members that more equipment is not part of the project’s scope may not be realistic or feasible, as the obsolete equipment may compromise the quality, functionality, or value of the final deliverable, or it may cause delays, rework, or defects. Submitting a change request to increase the budget and buy new equipment may not be necessary or justified, as there may be other alternatives or solutions to address the issue, or the change request may not meet the approval criteria or process. References:

• PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Project Management Institute Inc., 2017, pp. 235-236, 247-248, 487.
• The ABC of obsolescence management, Netilion Blog, 2023, pp. 1-2.
• 6 Steps to Equipment Obsolescence Management, Tool Tracking Software, 2023, p. 1.

= The project manager should take a proactive and collaborative approach to deal with the neighborhood resistance, which is a potential risk to the project. The project manager should analyze the situation and find out the root cause of the negative attitude, such as noise, pollution, traffic, safety, or other concerns. The project manager should also set up a meeting with the neighborhood representatives to win their cooperation and support, by addressing their issues, providing information, offering benefits, or negotiating solutions. Asking the customer to extend the deadline, asking the mayor to intervene, or sending letters to the neighbors are not effective actions, as they may escalate the conflict, damage the relationship, or ignore the problem. References:

• PMBOK® Guide 7th Edition, Chapter 8: Stakeholder Performance, Section 8.2: Engage Stakeholders, Page 205
• PMBOK® Guide 6th Edition, Chapter 13: Stakeholder Management, Section 13.3: Manage Stakeholder Engagement, Page 523
• Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 3: Implementing Agile: Creating an Agile Environment, Section 3.3: Customer Engagement Practices, Page 37

 According to the PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, one of the principles of project management is to optimize stakeholder value. This means that the project manager should understand and balance the needs and expectations of the stakeholders, and deliver solutions that create value for them. To optimize stakeholder value, the project manager should put all of the requirements, priorities, and progress on a visible board, share it with all entities, and decrease the number of meetings. This will help to communicate the project information clearly and transparently, to align the stakeholder expectations and feedback, and to reduce the waste and inefficiency caused by excessive meetings. Asking the project sponsor to attend the meetings, informing the stakeholders about a daily meeting, or stopping attending meetings are not the best actions, as they do not address the root cause of the problem, which is the lack of effective and efficient communication and collaboration among the project team and the end users. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 12-13.

 = The project manager should proactively communicate with the client to resolve any disputes or misunderstandings regarding the invoices and the payment terms. This is part of managing stakeholder expectations and ensuring customer satisfaction. The project manager should also document the issue and its resolution in the project records. Reviewing past projects, updating the procurement plan, or adding nonpayment to the issue log are not sufficient actions to deal with the problem and may delay the project or damage the relationship with the client. References:

• PMBOK® Guide 7th Edition, Chapter 8: Stakeholder Performance, Section 8.2: Engage Stakeholders, Page 205
• PMBOK® Guide 6th Edition, Chapter 12: Procurement Management, Section 12.3: Control Procurements, Page 507
• Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 3: Implementing Agile: Creating an Agile Environment, Section 3.3: Customer Engagement Practices, Page 37

 = The project manager should address and remove obstacles and blockers for the team to improve project performance. Obstacles and blockers are anything that prevents the team from completing their work or delivering value to the customer. They can be internal or external, technical or non-technical, predictable or unpredictable. The project manager should identify, prioritize, and resolve them as soon as possible, by using effective communication, negotiation, and problem-solving skills. The project manager should also protect the team from unnecessary distractions and interruptions, and provide them with the necessary resources and support. Empowering the team members, asking stakeholders to communicate directly, or adding blockers to the issue log and risk management plan are not the best actions to take, as they may not address the root cause or the urgency of the obstacles and blockers, or they may create more confusion or conflict. References:

• PMBOK® Guide 7th Edition, Chapter 7: Team Performance, Section 7.2: Enable Team Performance, Page 181
• PMBOK® Guide 6th Edition, Chapter 9: Resource Management, Section 9.4: Manage Team, Page 341
• Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 3: Implementing Agile: Creating an Agile Environment, Section 3.4: Delivery Practices, Page 40

According to the PMBOK Guide, a project manager should always comply with the applicable laws, regulations, and policies that affect the project. The project manager should also use various tools and techniques to optimize the project schedule, such as fast tracking, crashing, or agile methods. By doing this, the project manager can ensure that the project meets the quality standards and customer expectations, while also delivering the product as soon as possible. References:

• : A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Seventh Edition, page 17
• : A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Seventh Edition, page 51
• : A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Seventh Edition, page 53

This question is about managing a project with frequent scope changes and new knowledge, which suggests that the project is following an adaptive or agile approach. In such a situation, the project manager should use agile practices and tools to ensure that the project outcomes are aligned with the business goals and the stakeholder expectations. One of these practices is to create a prioritized backlog, which is a list of features or requirements that are ranked according to their value and urgency. The backlog helps the team to focus on the most important and relevant work items and to deliver them in short iterations. Another practice is to define iteration review sessions with stakeholders, which are meetings that occur at the end of each iteration to demonstrate the completed deliverables, collect feedback, and validate the value and quality of the work. The iteration review sessions help the team to communicate with the stakeholders, incorporate their input, and ensure their satisfaction. These practices can prevent the situation from happening in the future, as they can enhance the transparency, collaboration, and alignment of the project. The other options are not as suitable for managing a project with frequent scope changes and new knowledge, as they are more aligned with a traditional or predictive approach. Creating a detailed WBS and milestone schedule may not be realistic or feasible, as the scope may change or be unclear at the beginning of the project. Scheduling a kick-off meeting for every project phase may not be necessary or effective, as the project may not have distinct phases or the project management plan may change frequently. Scheduling a daily meeting to review team performance and impediments may not be sufficient or relevant, as it does not involve the stakeholders or address the business goals. References:

• PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Project Management Institute Inc., 2017, pp. 28-29, 35-36, 54-55, 170-171, 176-177, 487.
• Ultimate Guide To Hybrid Project Methodologies & How To Make Them, The Digital Project Manager, 2023, pp. 4-5, 9-10.
• A Guide to Hybrid Project Management: Blending Agile and Traditional PM, Float, 2023, pp. 3-4, 7-8.

According to the Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials, the project manager should acknowledge the lack of approval and focus on a resolution that will benefit the customer when a project sponsor is promoting the use of a new technology that has not yet been approved, and the operational support at project completion is uncertain. This is because the project manager needs to balance the interests and expectations of the project sponsor, the customer, and the service organization, and ensure that the project delivers value and quality to the customer. By acknowledging the lack of approval, the project manager can show respect and understanding to the service organization, and avoid further conflicts or risks. By focusing on a resolution that will benefit the customer, the project manager can work with the project sponsor and the service organization to find a way to implement the new technology without compromising the project scope, schedule, budget, or quality. The project manager can also seek the customer’s feedback and approval on the use of the new technology, and ensure that the customer’s needs and requirements are met. Acknowledging the lack of approval and focusing on a resolution that will benefit the customer can help the project manager to resolve the conflict in a constructive and collaborative way, and deliver a successful project outcome. References: Project Management Professional (PMP) Exam Content Outline, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) - Seventh Edition, What Is a Project Sponsor? Roles & Responsibilities, Project sponsorship - Project Management Institute.

 The project manager should handle this situation by using conflict resolution techniques to facilitate a constructive dialogue among the team members and reach a consensus on the new feature. According to the PMBOK® Guide, conflict resolution techniques include problem-solving, compromising, smoothing, forcing, and withdrawing1. In this case, problem-solving is the most appropriate technique, as it involves analyzing the root cause of the conflict and finding a mutually beneficial solution1. Bringing the team members to the meeting room is an example of problem-solving, as it allows the project manager to address the issue in a private and respectful manner, and to clarify the expectations and requirements of the new feature. This way, the project manager can resolve the conflict and get the team to complete the task. References: 1: PMBOK® Guide, 7th edition, page 95.

The best way for the project manager to gain an understanding of the cause for the resource’s refusal is to speak directly with the resource. This will allow the project manager to listen to the resource’s perspective, identify any issues or concerns, and seek a mutually acceptable solution. This approach is consistent with the principles of effective communication, stakeholder engagement, and conflict management in project management. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 376-377, 504-505, 518-519.
• PMP Exam Content Outline, June 2019, pages 8-9, 14-15.

According to the PMBOK® Guide 7th Edition, the project manager should monitor and control the project schedule by identifying and analyzing any variances, and by implementing corrective or preventive actions to ensure the timely completion of the project. The project manager should also consider the project environment and the stakeholder needs when managing the schedule, and use appropriate tools and techniques to optimize the schedule performance. Therefore, the project manager should update the schedule to reflect the holidays and share the workload among offices to mitigate schedule slippage. This would help to respect the cultural differences and the work-life balance of the team members, and to leverage the resources and the capabilities of the different offices. Option A is incorrect because it implies that the project manager is increasing the project cost and the complexity by hiring additional personnel on a temporary basis, which may not be feasible or effective. Option B is incorrect because it suggests that the project manager is imposing an unrealistic and unfair expectation on the offices in overseas locations, which may affect their motivation and productivity. Option C is incorrect because it indicates that the project manager is accepting the schedule delay without exploring any alternatives or solutions, which may compromise the project value and the stakeholder satisfaction. References: PMBOK® Guide 7th Edition, Chapter 4: Keeping the Team on Track, Section 4.1: Monitoring and Controlling the Project, p. 69-70.

According to the PMBOK® Guide 7th Edition, the project manager should select the project approach that best suits the project context and stakeholder needs. The project manager should also consider the impact of the chosen approach on the project delivery and the organization. Therefore, the project manager should review the adaptive tools’ impact and obtain agreement from the functional manager before implementing them in the project. This would help to address the functional manager’s concerns and ensure alignment with the PMO’s request. Option A is incorrect because it ignores the functional manager’s concerns and may cause resistance or conflict. Option C is incorrect because it disregards the PMO’s request and may miss the opportunity to use adaptive tools that could benefit the project. Option D is incorrect because it assumes that the project manager can make the decision on the project approach without consulting the functional manager or the PMO, which could lead to misalignment or misunderstanding. References: PMBOK® Guide 7th Edition, Chapter 2: Creating a High-Performing Team, Section 2.3: Selecting the Project Approach, p. 37-38.

 In an agile project, the project manager should collaborate with the customer and the team to deliver value and satisfy the customer’s needs. One of the ways to do this is to provide user training materials as part of the project deliverables, so that the users can learn how to use the system and reduce the dependency on the system architect. This will also help the system architect focus on their core tasks and avoid interruptions from the users. Option B is the best answer because it addresses the root cause of the problem and provides a long-term solution. Option A is not a good answer because it does not solve the problem of the users’ lack of knowledge and may affect the quality of the system design. Option C is not a good answer because it adds more work to the system architect and does not involve the customer or the team. Option D is not a good answer because it does not address the problem of the users’ lack of knowledge and may delay the feedback and communication between the users and the system architect. References: [Agile Practice Guide], page 28; [A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide)], Sixth Edition, page 18.

Servant leadership is a leadership style that focuses on empowering and serving the team members, rather than directing or controlling them. Servant leaders foster acollaborative and trusting environment, where team members can share their ideas, opinions, and concerns. Servant leaders also support the team members in their professional and personal growth, and help them overcome any obstacles or challenges. This leadership style would effectively promote collaboration across the project teams, especially in a complex project that involves agile and predictive work. Servant leadership is aligned with the principles of agile project management, as well as the values and ethics of project management. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 56-57, 504-505, 686-687.
• PMP Exam Content Outline, June 2019, pages 8-9, 14-15.
• Agile Practice Guide, pages 19-20, 27-28.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager is responsible for developing the project team by improving their competencies, interactions, and overall performance. One of the tools and techniques for developing the project team is ground rules, which are the mutually agreed-upon standards of behavior that guide the team’s actions and interactions. Ground rules can help the project manager establish the expectations, roles, and responsibilities of the team members, as well as the methods and frequency of communication. In this scenario, the project manager is assigned to a new project, and the PMO and the project manager agree that this is the right opportunity to include daily standup meetings, which are short and focused meetings that allow the team to share progress, issues, and plans. The project team has never used such tools, and a few members are challenging the decision, which may indicate a lack of understanding or agreement on the purpose and benefits of daily standup meetings. The best way to handle this situation is to define the ground rules, responsibilities, and conflict management strategies, using ground rules as a tool. This option can help the project manager explain the rationale and objectives of daily standup meetings, clarify the roles and expectations of the team members, and address any concerns or disagreements that may arise. Engaging an external vendor, requesting new team members, or updating the project schedule are not the best options, as they do not address the issue of team development, or may be unnecessary or impractical to implement. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 215-216, 9.5 Develop Team.

 According to the PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, the project manager should act as a facilitator and coach in an agile environment, which means supporting the team members in their self-organization, collaboration, and decision making. The project manager should also respect the team’s autonomy and empower them to deliver value. Therefore, the best option is to allow the team to decide on their own which option should be implemented, based on the results of the spikes. Asking the project sponsor, organizing a multivoting event, or organizing more spike events are possible actions that the project manager can take later, but they are not the best option to support the team in their agile approach. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Ed., 2.0 The Project Delivery Principles, Page 9; PMBOK Guide 7th Ed., 3.0 The Project Team, Page 23; 1

The project manager should foster knowledge sharing and coaching among team members to address the slack in productivity caused by the lack of knowledge in one of the frameworks used for modeling. This way, the project manager can leverage the existing skills and expertise of the team members who are familiar with the framework, and help the others to learn and improve their performance. The project manager can also use various agile techniques, such as pair programming, peer reviews, retrospectives, and feedback loops, to facilitate knowledge sharing and coaching. The project manager should not seek an external expert, arrange for external training, or add new members, as these options may be costly, time-consuming, or disruptive to the team dynamics and collaboration. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 349, Top 60+ PMP Exam Questions and Answers for 2023 - KnowledgeHut

= According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, an issue is a point or matter in question or in dispute, or a point or matter that is not settled and is under discussion or over which there are opposing views or disagreements1. An issue log is a tool that records and tracks issues that arise during the project and require resolution2. The project manager should review and update the issue log regularly, and determine the appropriate actions to resolve the issues, such as finding alternative solutions, escalating to higher authority, or negotiating with stakeholders3. Therefore, the project manager should review and update the issue log and determine if any alternative components can be offered, to minimize the impact of the vendor delay on the project schedule. This is also consistent with the project management principle of being proactive and responsive. References:

• 1: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Glossary, p. 309
• 2: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 5: Monitor and Control Project Work, p. 97
• 3: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 5: Monitor and Control Project Work, p. 98-99
• : PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 1: Introduction, p. 9

 According to the PMBOK® Guide, project monitoring and controlling involves the processes of tracking, reviewing, and regulating the progress and performance of the project. One of the tools and techniques for monitoring and controlling project work is data analysis, which includes methods such as performance reviews, trend analysis, and variance analysis. The project lead should use data analysis to collect and evaluate the operational usage data of the software system, which reflects the actual behavior andpreferences of the users. This will help the project lead to measure the delivered value of the project and identify any gaps or improvement opportunities. Building the functionality in the software to collect the operational usage data is the most accurate and reliable evaluation practice, as it avoids the biases or errors that might arise from other methods such as questionnaires, feedback forms, or interviews. References:

• PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, Chapter 4: Project Integration Management, pp. 111-158.
• PMP Exam Prep Coursebook, Chapter 4: Project Integration Management, pp. 4-1 - 4-24.
• Project Evaluation Process: Definition, Methods & Steps by Peter Landau

According to the web search results, a subject matter expert (SME) is a professional with in-depth knowledge of a specific subject or area1. They collaborate with project managers, teams and stakeholders to provide technical expertise and input in their area1. When an SME leaves a project, it can have a significant impact on the project’s quality, scope, schedule and budget2.

One of the possible actions that a project manager can take when an SME leaves a project is to refer to the resource management plan3. The resource management plan is a component of the project management plan that describes how project resources are acquired, allocated, managed and released4. It may also include a contingency plan for dealing with resource changes or risks4. By referring to the resource management plan, the project manager can identify the best way to replace the SME or adjust the project accordingly3.

Another possible action that a project manager can take when an SME leaves a project is to consult the project sponsor. The project sponsor is a person or group who provides resources and support for the project and is accountable for enabling success4. The project sponsor can help the project manager to secure a new SME, approve changes to the project scope or budget, or resolve any issues or conflicts that may arise due to the SME’s departure.

The other two options, updating the stakeholder register and modifying the statement of work (SOW), may not be the best actions to take when an SME leaves a project. The stakeholder register is a project document that identifies the people, groups or organizations that have an interest in or may affect or be affected by the project4. The statement of work (SOW) is a narrative description of the products, services or results to be delivered by the project4. Updating the stakeholder register or modifying the SOW may not be necessary or appropriate unless the project scope, objectives or deliverables have changed significantly due to the SME’s departure.

Therefore, based on the web search results, the most likely answer to the question is either C or B, but you will have to verify the answer yourself using the official sources.

References: 2: Employment Downsizing and its Alternatives - SHRM 1: SMEs in Project Management: Definition and Importance | Indeed.com 3: The Subject Matter Expert (A Misunderstood Product Owner Stance) 4: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition : Why And How You Should Develop In-House Subject Matter Experts … - Forbes : Project Management Professional (PMP)® Examination Content Outline

= According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, the communications management plan is a component of the project management plan that describes how, when, and by whom information about the project will be shared, stored, and distributed1. It also defines the communication requirements and expectations of the project stakeholders, such as the level of detail, frequency, format, and confidentiality of the information2. Therefore, the project manager should review the communications management plan with the team members, to ensure that they are aware of and follow the agreed communication protocols and methods. This would help to address the issue of the team member who never speaks during meetings, but sends emails afterwards, which may indicate a preference or a challenge for a different communication mode. The project manager should also encourage the team member to share their valuable suggestions during the meetings, as this would enhance the team collaboration and performance3. References:

• 1: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 4: Plan and Manage Communications, p. 69
• 2: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 4: Plan and Manage Communications, p. 70-71
• 3: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 2: Lead a Team, p. 29-30

According to the PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, one of the principles of project management is to engage stakeholders. This means that the project manager should identify, analyze, and involve the stakeholders throughout the project, and provide them with timely and appropriate information that meets their needs and expectations. To engage stakeholders, the project manager should share all relevant project information with the stakeholders, such as the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, quality, risks, issues, changes, and progress. This will help to keep the stakeholders informed, aligned, and satisfied with the project, and to obtain their feedback and support. Scheduling one-on-one meetings, providing daily reports, or minimizing communication are not the best approaches, as they may not suit the preferences, availability, or influence of the stakeholders, and they may not address the complexity, uncertainty, or urgency of the project information. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 12-13.

The project lead should first discuss with the product owner, who is responsible for defining and prioritizing the product requirements and ensuring that they deliver value to the customer and the organization. The project lead should understand the rationale behind the senior manager’s request and the impact it would have on the product vision, scope, and schedule. The project lead should also collaborate with the product owner to assess the feasibility and desirability of the proposed redesign and determine the best way to handle it in the hybrid delivery approach. This approach is consistent with the principles of stakeholder engagement, communication management, and agile project management. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 51-52, 513-514, 686-687.
• PMP Exam Content Outline, June 2019, pages 6-7, 10-11, 16-17.
• Agile Practice Guide, pages 19-20, 27-28, 35-36.

 This answer is based on the formula of schedule performance index (SPI), which is the ratio of earned value (EV) to planned value (PV). Earned value (EV) is the measure of work performed expressed in terms of the budget authorized for that work. Planned value (PV) is the authorized budget assigned to the scheduled work. In an agile project, story points are often used as a unit of measure for expressing the size of a user story,feature, or other piece of work. Therefore, in this question, the earned value (EV) is 30 story points, which is the actual work completed in the iteration, and the planned value (PV) is 40 story points, which is the planned work for the iteration. By applying the formula of SPI = EV / PV, we get SPI = 30 / 40 = 0.75. This means that the project is behind schedule, as the SPI is less than 1. References: (Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials source and documents)

• A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 7: Planning and Managing the Budget, Section 7.3: Managing the Budget, page 172.
• Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 5: Implementing Agile: Monitoring and Controlling, Section 5.2: Monitoring and Controlling in an Agile Environment, page 58.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, a project manager is responsible for ensuring that the project complies with the relevant laws, regulations, policies, standards, and ethical codes that apply to the project context and environment1. A project manager should also ensure that the project deliverables meet the quality requirements and expectations of the project stakeholders2. A project manager should also ensure that the project documentation is complete, accurate, and updated throughout the project life cycle3.

In this scenario, the project manager has been managing a highly complex project and has ensured that all of the required tasks have been completed. However, during a recent external audit, the project manager was informed of a heavy penalty being levied on the project for the latest module that was implemented. This implies that the project manager did not ensure that the project complied with the applicable laws, regulations, or standards that govern the project domain or industry. The project manager should have ensured that all the required approvals were received per the organizational procedures before implementing the module, as this would have prevented the liability and the penalty. The organizational procedures may include obtaining legal, regulatory, contractual, or internal approvals from the appropriate authorities or parties4.

The project manager should not have ensured that all defects identified during testing were resolved before implementation, as this is not relevant to the liability issue. The project manager should have done this as part of the quality management process, but this would not have guaranteed compliance with the external laws, regulations, or standards. The project manager should not have ensured that all of the required tasks identified in the scope were completed successfully, as this is not sufficient to avoid theliability issue. The project manager should have done this as part of the scope management process, but this would not have ensured compliance with the external laws, regulations, or standards. The project manager should not have ensured that all documentation was completed post implementation before closing the project, as this is too late to prevent the liability issue. The project manager should have done this as part of the closure process, but this would not have avoided the penalty for the non-compliant module.

References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 39. 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 286. 3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 123. 4: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 377.

According to the Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials, a stakeholder register is a tool that the project manager should have used to prevent this situation. A stakeholder register is a document that identifies and analyzes the project stakeholders, their roles, interests, expectations, influence, and communication needs. A stakeholder register helps the project manager to plan and manage stakeholder engagement, and ensure that the project meets the stakeholder requirements and expectations. A stakeholder register also helps the project manager to identify and address any potential conflicts, risks, or issues that may arise from the stakeholder involvement. By using a stakeholder register, the project manager could have avoided the situation where a key stakeholder did not receive the functionality test status reports, and noticed that an important functionality for their area was not tested. The project manager could have ensured that the stakeholder was properly informed and involved in the testing process, and that their feedback and approval were obtained before moving to the next phase of the project. References: Project Management Professional (PMP) Exam Content Outline, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) - Seventh Edition, Stakeholder Register.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should manage the project procurement, including the planning, conducting, controlling, and closing of the procurement activities. The project manager should also manage the project stakeholder expectations, including the identification, analysis, planning, and engagement of the stakeholders throughout the project life cycle. In this scenario, the project manager is managing the construction of new corporate offices for a large company, and the project management plan states that it is necessary to contract a highly trained external resource to revise and validate an important project component. However, the client has rejected hiring the external resource because of the high cost, even though it is within the project budget. This is a procurement and stakeholder issue that may affect the quality and delivery of the project. The best course of action is to evaluate the consequences and meet with the client to explain the possible scenarios. This can help the project manager to assess the impact and value of the external resource, to identify and communicate the risks and benefits of hiring or not hiring the external resource, and to seek and provide feedback and approval from the client. Evaluating the consequences and meeting with the client to explain the possible scenarios (option B) is the best solution to the issue, as it demonstrates proactive and effective project procurement and stakeholder management. Hiring the resource in order to achieve the project objectives (option A) may not be feasible or ethical, as it may violate the contract terms and conditions, and may damage the trust and relationship with the client. Asking the client for a meeting and explaining that the task will not be performed (option C) may also be counterproductive or unacceptable, as it may compromise the quality and scope of the project, and may create a conflict or dissatisfaction with the client. Trying to accomplish the task internally by leveling resources from other projects (option D) may also be unrealistic or inefficient, as it may require additional resources and time to acquire and train the internal resources, and may disrupt the existing project schedule and performance. References: : Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the ProjectManagement Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (6th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author1 : Project Management Professional (PMP)® Certification | PMI 2 : How to Manage Project Procurement Effectively 3 : How to Manage Stakeholder Expectations 4

 According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, one of the project manager’s responsibilities is to apply relevant knowledge and experience from previous projects to the current project1. This can help the project manager to identify best practices, avoid pitfalls, and improve the project performance2. Therefore, the project manager should review the lessons learned from the previous project that developed the existing product, as they may provide valuable insights and recommendations for enhancing the product. This can also help the project manager to align the project objectives with the organizational strategy and customer needs3. Ensuring the stakeholder engagement plan is accurate and properly documented (option A) is an important task, but it is not the first thing the project manager should do when initiating a project. Creating a lessons learned document for the initiation phase (option B) is a good practice, but it is not the answer to the question, as it is something the project manager should do at the end of the initiation phase, not at the beginning. Identifying the risk of implementing the new solution and evaluating the impact on the project (option C) is also a vital task, but it is not the answer to the question, as it is something the project manager should do during the planning phase, not the initiation phase. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 25 2: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 26 3: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 27

  this question is related to the Project Management Professional (PMP) certification exam, which is a credential that validates the knowledge and skills of project managers. The PMP exam is based on the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, which is a standard that provides a framework and best practices for managing projects. The question describes a situation where a project manager has access to risk management tools but chooses to use a quantitative method to evaluate the project risks. During project execution, the project sponsor asks for an updated risk matrix. The question asks what the project manager should do next.

Based on this information, the best answer is option C, which is to add new risks and send the risk matrix to leadership for approval. This is because adding new risks and sending the risk matrix to leadership for approval is a risk management practice that can help the project manager to update and communicate the project risks and their status. A risk matrix is a tool that displays the probability and impact of the project risks, as well as their priority and response strategies. Adding new risks is a process that involves identifying and analyzing any new or emerging risks that may affect the project objectives or outcomes. Sending the risk matrix to leadership for approval is a process that involves obtaining the endorsement and support from the project sponsor and other senior stakeholders for the risk management plan and actions. Adding new risks and sending the risk matrix to leadership for approval can help the project manager to ensure that the project risks are properly identified, assessed, and managed, as well as to align the project risks with the stakeholder expectations and interests.

Option A, which is to use integrated risk management software to evaluate the risks, is not a good answer. This is because using integrated risk management software may not be necessary or effective to update and communicate the project risks and their status. Integrated risk management software is a tool that helps to automate and integrate the risk management processes and activities, such as risk identification, analysis, response, monitoring, and reporting. Using integrated risk management software can help theproject manager to facilitate and streamline the risk management tasks and functions, as well as to enhance the risk management efficiency and quality. However, using integrated risk management software may not help the project manager to update and communicate the project risks and their status, as it may not address the issue of new or emerging risks that may require human judgment or intervention. Using integrated risk management software may also depend on the availability, suitability, and compatibility of the software, as well as the cost, time, and training required to use the software.

Option B, which is to use their own professional knowledge to reassess the risks, is not a good answer. This is because using their own professional knowledge may not be enough or reliable to update and communicate the project risks and their status. Professional knowledge is the knowledge and skills that the project manager has acquired from their education, training, experience, or certification. Using their own professional knowledge can help the project manager to apply the relevant and appropriate risk management concepts, methods, and techniques to the project. However, using their own professional knowledge may not help the project manager to update and communicate the project risks and their status, as it may not reflect the current and accurate information and data about the project risks. Using their own professional knowledge may also introduce bias or error to the risk assessment and evaluation, as well as to conflict or contradict with the stakeholder opinions or expectations.

Option D, which is to trust in the quantitative method already chosen as it is a precise method, is not a good answer. This is because trusting in the quantitative method may not be appropriate or beneficial to update and communicate the project risks and their status. A quantitative method is a technique that uses numerical data and analysis to measure and evaluate the probability and impact of the project risks, as well as to estimate the overall risk exposure and contingency of the project. A quantitative method can help the project manager to obtain objective and precise information and results about the project risks, as well as to support the risk management decision-making and planning. However, trusting in the quantitative method may not help the project manager to update and communicate the project risks and their status, as it may not account for the new or emerging risks that may require qualitative or subjective assessment and evaluation. Trusting in the quantitative method may also ignore or overlook the stakeholder feedback or input, as well as the risk management tools or resources that may be available or useful for the project. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition; PMP Exam Content Outline; PMP Sample Test Questions.

 The project manager should analyze the cost and identify the project benefits before initiating a project involving a new technology. This is because the project manager needs to justify the business case and the return on investment (ROI) of the project to the project sponsor and other stakeholders who will approve the project. The projectmanager should also consider the alignment of the project with the organizational strategy and goals. The project manager should use tools and techniques such as cost-benefit analysis, net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) to evaluate the feasibility and viability of the project.

• Option A is not a good action, as reviewing the cost and schedule baselines for execution is a planning activity that should be done after the project is approved and initiated. The project manager should not assume the project baselines before conducting a thorough analysis of the project scope, requirements, resources, and constraints.
• Option B is not a good action, as identifying the risks in implementing the new technology is also a planning activity that should be done after the project is approved and initiated. The project manager should not focus on the potential negative outcomes of the project before establishing the positive outcomes and benefits of the project.
• Option C is not a good action, as defining change management for the new technology is also a planning activity that should be done after the project is approved and initiated. The project manager should not anticipate the changes that may occur during the project execution before defining the project scope, objectives, and deliverables. References:
• [PMBOK Guide], 6th edition, page 33, section 1.2.3
• [PMP Exam Content Outline], page 8, task 1 under domain 1

 According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, one of the key practices for stakeholder engagement is to “engage stakeholders to understand their needs, expectations, and interests, and to obtain their support and commitment for the project” (p. 121). This practice involves identifying and analyzing stakeholders, developing and implementing stakeholder engagement plans, and monitoring and adjusting stakeholder engagement activities. The project manager should allocate time to gain buy-in from the stakeholder prior to key decision meetings, as this will help to reduce resistance, increase collaboration, and enhance the quality of decisions. Updating the project schedule, asking that only key decision makers attend the meetings, or updating the risk register are not effective ways to handle the situation, as they do not address the root cause of the problem, which is the stakeholder’s lack of alignment with the project objectives and approach. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, p. 121-122; PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain II: Process, Task 4.

= According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, the communications management plan is a component of the project management plan that describes how, when, and by whom information about the project will be shared, stored, and distributed1. It also defines the communication requirements and expectations of the project stakeholders, such as thelevel of detail, frequency, format, and confidentiality of the information2. Therefore, the project manager should have reviewed the communications management plan before inviting an external client representative to the meeting, to ensure that the meeting agenda and content are appropriate and aligned with the stakeholder communication needs and preferences. This would have helped to avoid any potential conflicts, misunderstandings, or surprises that could have caused the CEO to end the meeting abruptly. References:

• 1: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 4: Plan and Manage Communications, p. 69
• 2: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 4: Plan and Manage Communications, p. 70-71

 According to the PMP reference materials, a project that is required to deliver value on an incremental basis should follow the agile project management approach12. This approach emphasizes delivering working product frequently, from a couple of weeks to a couple of months, with a preference to the shorter timescale3. To enable successful project execution, the project manager should identify the tangible and intangible benefits that each product increment will deliver to the customer and the organization4. This will help the project manager prioritize the product features, plan the iterations, and measure the progress and value of the project4. The other options are not the best actions to take for an incremental project, as they may not align with the agile principles and practices. Engaging with the project sponsor to understand the scope (A) is important, but not sufficient, as the scope may change or evolve based on customer feedback and changing requirements. Developing a comprehensive set ofrequirements (B) is not advisable, as it may lead to over-analysis and delay the delivery of value. Creating a project schedule containing milestones © is not consistent with the agile approach, as it may impose rigid constraints and limit the flexibility and adaptability of the project team. References: 1: The Agile Project Management Approach - Project Management Institute 2: Agile best practices for incremental delivery | Hexaware 3: Incremental Delivery and the Principles of the Agile Manifesto | Scrum.org 4: PMP Q #44- Delivering Value Incrementally - iZenBridge

According to the PMBOK® Guide, project resource management involves the processes of planning, acquiring, developing, managing, and controlling project resources. The project manager is responsible for ensuring that the project team members have the necessary skills, knowledge, and abilities to perform their assigned tasks. One of the tools and techniques for developing the project team is training, which includes formal or informal learning activities to enhance the competencies of the team members. The project manager should assign an experienced resource to support the team member who is having difficulty with the new system, and provide them with the appropriate training to help them understand and use the system effectively. This will help the project manager to improve the team member’s performance, reduce the risk of delay, and increase the quality of the deliverables. References:

• PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, Chapter 9: Project Resource Management, pp. 313-360.
• PMP Exam Prep Coursebook, Chapter 9: Project Resource Management, pp. 9-1 - 9-16.

This answer is based on the knowledge area of project cost management, which involves planning, estimating, budgeting, managing, and controlling the project costs. Earned value (EV) is a tool that measures the actual work completed and the value of that work, compared to the planned work and the budget. By using EV, the project manager canmonitor the project performance and progress, and identify any variances or deviations from the baseline. The project manager can also use cost triggers and trend analyses to detect and respond to any potential issues or risks that may affect the project cost. References: (Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials source and documents)

• A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 7: Planning and Managing the Budget, Section 7.3: Managing the Budget, page 173.
• The Standard for Project Management, Part 2: Value Delivery System, Section 2.3: Project Monitoring and Controlling, page 53.

= The project manager should have facilitated cross-functional knowledge transfer during the project to prevent the situation where a single team member’s absence would jeopardize the project progress. Cross-functional knowledge transfer is a way of sharing skills, expertise, and information among team members to enhance collaboration, innovation, and performance. It also reduces the risk of knowledge loss or dependency on a single resource. Requesting robust documentation, outsourcing development, or acquiring more resources are not the best ways to prevent this situation, as they may not be feasible, cost-effective, or timely. References:

• PMBOK® Guide 7th Edition, Chapter 7: Team Performance, Section 7.2: Enable Team Performance, Page 181
• PMBOK® Guide 6th Edition, Chapter 9: Resource Management, Section 9.3: Develop Team, Page 336
• Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 3: Implementing Agile: Creating an Agile Environment, Section 3.4: Delivery Practices, Page 40

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should consider cultural differences among stakeholders when planning and managing communication in a global project. Cultural differences can affect the communication preferences, styles, expectations, and behaviors of the stakeholders, and may lead to misunderstandings, conflicts, or misalignment of goals. The project manager should be aware of the cultural dimensions, such as power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism versus collectivism, masculinity versus femininity, and long-term versus short-term orientation, and how they influence the communication process. The project manager should also use appropriate communication methods, formats, languages, and etiquette to respect and accommodate the cultural diversity of the stakeholders. By considering cultural differences, the project manager can enhance the effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of the project communication, and foster trust, collaboration, and stakeholder satisfaction. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 29, 376, 377, 378, 379.

According to the PMBOK® Guide 7th Edition, the project manager should create a high-performing team by fostering a collaborative, respectful, and trusting environment. The project manager should also help the team members to overcome personal and interpersonal issues that may affect their performance. Therefore, the project manager should advise the team member to focus on the current project and consider the past conflicts as lessons learned. This would help the team member to move on from the negative experiences and contribute positively to the project. Option B is incorrect because it implies that the team member should hide their personal information from the entire team, which could create a sense of isolation or mistrust. Option C is incorrect because it suggests that the project sponsor has the authority to decide what personal information can be shared with the entire team, which could violate the team member’s privacy or autonomy. Option D is incorrect because it implies that the project manager needs to consult with HR and check company policies before advising the team member, which could delay the resolution of the issue or undermine the project manager’s role as a leader. References: PMBOK® Guide 7th Edition, Chapter 2: Creating a High-Performing Team, Section 2.1: Establishing a Team, p. 29-30.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, a project manager should monitor and control the project work by comparing the actual performance with the planned performance and analyzing the variances. If the budget at completion has shifted significantly and is higher than expected, it indicates that there is a cost overrun or a negative cost variance. The project manager should perform a root cause analysis of the project performance to identify the factors that caused the deviation and take corrective or preventive actions to bring the project back on track. Adjusting the original budget estimates, reviewing the activity duration, or negotiating the project changes are not the best options, as they do not address the underlying causes of the problem and may lead to further issues in the future. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 205-206.

According to the PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, an issue log is a tool for managing issues that arise during a project. It records the issue description, the owner, the status, the priority, and the resolution date. Updating the issue log with the status and priority of the technical impediment is the best action for the senior project manager to do now, as it helps to track the progress of the issue resolution and communicate it to the relevant stakeholders. Using interpersonal skills, sending a reminder, or issuing a warning are not sufficient actions to manage the issue effectively, as they do not provide a clear and documented record of the issue and its impact on the project. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 215-216.

 = According to the PMBOK Guide, project closure is the process of finalizing all activities across all of the project management process groups to formally complete the project or phase. Project closure involves verifying that the project deliverables meet the acceptance criteria, obtaining formal acceptance from the customer or sponsor, transferring the ownership and responsibility of the deliverables, updating the organizational process assets, archiving the project documents, releasing the project resources, and conducting a lessons learned session. In this scenario, the project manager should hold a meeting with the project team, project sponsor, and the client to agree to the further work required to close the project and add to lessons learned, as this can help to resolve the dispute over the code inspections, ensure the satisfaction and acceptance ofthe client, document the project performance and outcomes, and identify the best practices and improvement opportunities for future projects. Closing the project and handing over the deliverables to the client, holding a lessons learned workshop without the client, or seeking expert legal advice are not the best options, as they may not address the client’s concerns, damage the relationship with the client, or escalate the conflict unnecessarily. References: = PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 284-285, 290-291.

 According to the PMBOK® Guide, document quality control is the process of ensuring that the project documents meet the quality standards and requirements of the project and the stakeholders. Document quality control involves the following activities:

• Defining the quality criteria and specifications for the project documents, such as format, style, language, accuracy, completeness, consistency, etc.
• Reviewing and inspecting the project documents to verify that they comply with the quality criteria and specifications, and that they are free of errors, omissions, or inconsistencies.
• Identifying and correcting any defects or deviations in the project documents, and updating them accordingly.
• Validating and approving the project documents, and obtaining the acceptance and sign-off from the stakeholders.

Document quality control is an important aspect of project quality management, as it helps to ensure the clarity, reliability, and usability of the project information, and to avoid any confusion, misunderstanding, or miscommunication among the project team and the stakeholders.

In this question, the project manager is managing a technical project that requires intensive documentation as part of the key deliverables. In a project review meeting, a key stakeholder reports that the latest documentation provided by the project manager includes a reference to unrelated products. This indicates that the project manager has not performed document quality control properly, and that the project documents are not accurate, complete, or consistent. This can create problems for the project manager and the project team, such as rework, delays, disputes, or dissatisfaction. To resolve this issue, the project manager should take the following action:

• Develop a standard for document quality control. The project manager should establish and document the quality criteria and specifications for the project documents, and communicate them to the project team and the stakeholders. The project manager should also define and implement the document quality control processes and procedures, such as review, inspection, correction, validation, and approval. The project manager should also assign roles and responsibilities for document quality control, and provide the necessary tools and resources. The project manager should also monitor and measure the document quality performance, and identify and implement any improvements. This will help to ensure the quality and consistency of the project documents, and to meet the expectations and needs of the stakeholders.

The other options are not correct because they do not provide a valid way to resolve the issue of document quality control. Option A is wrong because it suggests that the project manager should ask the project management office (PMO) to support and review all deliverables, without developing a standard for document quality control. This would be delegating the responsibility and accountability for document quality control to the PMO, and not addressing the root cause of the issue. Option B is wrong because it implies that the project manager should log the issue in the risk register and the issue log, without developing a standard for document quality control. This would be documenting the issue and its impact, but not taking any corrective or preventive actions to resolve it. Option D is wrong because it assumes that the project manager should assign a technical writer to the project, without developing a standard fordocument quality control. This would be adding a resource to the project, but not defining or communicating the quality criteria and specifications for the project documents. References:

• PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, pages 286-287, 318-319, 374-375
• Project Quality Control - ProjectEngineer
• The Quality Management Plan in Project Management
• Project Quality Management According to the PMBOK - ProjectEngineer

According to the Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials, the project manager should request additional resources to be incorporated to the project team when a few key team members recently left the project team, and the remaining members took time to understand the details and found it difficult to make progress, resulting in a serious delay in the project schedule. This is because the project manager needs to ensure that the project has sufficient resources to complete the work within the agreed time, cost, and quality constraints. By requesting additional resources, the project manager can fill the gaps left by the departed team members, and provide the necessary skills, expertise, and experience to the project. The project manager can also use the additional resources to accelerate the work, reduce the learning curve, and mitigate the risks associated with the team turnover. Requesting additional resources can help the project manager to recover from the setback, and deliver the project successfully. References: Project Management Professional (PMP) Exam Content Outline, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) - Seventh Edition, How To Handle A Key Team Member Leaving At A Critical Project Point.

This answer is based on the principle of stakeholder engagement, which involves identifying and addressing the needs, expectations, and concerns of the project stakeholders, including the project team members. By having a meeting with the resource who wants to leave the project, the project manager can try to understand the reason behind this decision, and explore the possible options to retain the resource or mitigate the impact of the resource change. This will also help to maintain a good relationship with the resource and avoid any negative consequences for the project performance or morale. References: (Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials source and documents)

• A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 13: Engaging Stakeholders, Section 13.2: Planning Stakeholder Engagement, page 305.
• The Standard for Project Management, Part 2: Value Delivery System, Section 2.1: Project Initiation, page 39.

According to the PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, an agile project is a project that uses an adaptive, iterative, incremental, or agile approach to deliver value to the customer in a fast and flexible way. An agile project typically consists of several iterations, which are short cycles of work that produce a potentially releasable product increment. An agile project also uses key indicators, such as velocity, burnup, burndown, or cumulative flow, to measure and monitor the progress and performance of the project by iteration. Therefore, the project lead should explain to the stakeholder that the key indicators are by iteration, and provide the stakeholder with the relevant information that shows the current status and trends of the project. This will help to communicate the project information clearly and transparently, to align the stakeholder expectations and feedback, and to demonstrate the value delivered by the project. Telling the stakeholder that a new report will be produced, asking the product owner to develop the new report, or developing the requested report are not the best actions, as they may not suit the preferences, availability, or influence of the stakeholder, and they may not reflect the agile principles and practices of the project. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 19-20.

 According to the PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, the project manager should lead and support the project team and collaborate with them to deliver the project outcomes. In this case, the project manager should meet with the project team to discuss the concerns and determine how to ensure the project’s deliverable can compete with the competitor’s, such as by incorporating customer feedback, enhancing the features, or applying the newest technology. The project manager should not perform a Kano analysis, as this is a technique to prioritize the customer requirements, not the competitor’s. The project manager should not meet with the development team only, as this may exclude other team members who may have valuable inputs. The project manager should not note this concern in the risk register and meet with the sales team only, as this may not address the root cause of the problem and may not involve the project team12. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, Chapter 3: Project Performance Domain, Section 3.3: Lead the Team, Page 65; Chapter 4: Project Delivery, Section 4.2: Collect Requirements, Page 89.

 A resource management plan is a document that describes how the project resources will be acquired, allocated, monitored, and controlled throughout the project life cycle1. A resource management plan helps project managers to ensure that the project has sufficient and appropriate resources to complete the project work on time and within budget. A resource management plan also defines the roles and responsibilities of the project team members and the resource managers, and the processes and tools for managing resource availability, utilization, and performance2.

In this question, the project manager should have asked the manager responsible for the equipment delivery to follow the agreed-upon resource management plan, which would have specified the resource requirements, allocation, and schedule for the equipment installation. By following the resource management plan, the manager could have avoided the capacity issue for the installation team, or at least communicated it to the project manager in advance, so that the project manager could have taken corrective actions to mitigate the impact on the project schedule. The project manager should also have monitored and controlled the resource management plan throughout the project, and updated it as needed to reflect any changes or issues in the resource availability or demand3.

Option A is not the best answer because conducting periodic reviews with the manager on resource availability may not be enough to prevent the situation from happening.The project manager should have established a clear and formal resource management plan with the manager, and ensured that the manager followed it consistently and reported any deviations or problems.

Option B is not the best answer because defining the skill requirements more clearly in the scope statement may not be relevant to the situation. The scope statement is a document that defines the project scope, deliverables, assumptions, and constraints4. The skill requirements are part of the resource requirements, which are defined in the resource management plan, not the scope statement.

Option C is not the best answer because consulting with the installation team on a regular basis to check for conflicts may not be the project manager’s responsibility. The project manager should have delegated the responsibility of managing the installation team to the manager in charge of the equipment delivery, and relied on the manager to follow the resource management plan and report any issues or conflicts to the project manager. References:

• 1: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 83
• 2: Resource Plan: The Ultimate Guide to Resource Planning5
• 3: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 85
• 4: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 77
• 5: Resource Plan: The Ultimate Guide to Resource Planning

According to the PMBOK Guide, agile is a way of thinking and working that is based on values, principles, and practices that enable the delivery of high-quality products that meet customer needs and expectations. Agile emphasizes collaboration, flexibility, feedback, and continuous improvement. Agile practices can be applied to any type of project, but they are particularly suitable for projects that have high uncertainty, complexity, and change. In this scenario, the project manager should organize a meeting with relevant stakeholders explaining the benefits of agile and the practices relevant for the project, as this can help to create a shared understanding of the project vision, goals, and approach, as well as to address any concerns, questions, or resistance that the stakeholders may have. Sending the project management plan,organizing a meeting with a consultant, or asking the PMO to get buy-in are not the best options, as they may not involve the stakeholders directly, or may not provide enough information, guidance, or support for the stakeholders to adopt agile practices. References: = PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 14-15, 18-19, 22-23.

The requirements traceability matrix is a tool that links the project requirements to the project scope, deliverables, quality criteria, and verification methods. It helps to ensure that the project meets the stakeholder expectations and the quality standards. By reviewing the matrix and conducting inspections, the project manager can identify any gaps or discrepancies between the quality specifications and the deliverables, and take corrective actions if needed. The other options are not appropriate in thissituation, as they do not address the root cause of the stakeholder’s dissatisfaction or the quality issue. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 101, 103, 108.

 The project manager should accept only those changes that are approved by the CCB prior to being implemented because this is the best way to control the scope and prevent scope creep. Scope creep is the uncontrolled expansion of the project scope due to the addition of new requirements or changes without proper authorization, analysis, or documentation. Scope creep can negatively affect the project performance, quality, schedule, cost, and stakeholder satisfaction. To control the scope, the project manager should follow the change management process, which includes submitting change requests, evaluating the impact of changes, obtaining approval from the CCB, and updating the project documents and baselines accordingly. The CCB is a group of stakeholders who are responsible for reviewing, approving, rejecting, or deferring change requests based on predefined criteria and authority levels. By following this process, the project manager can ensure that only valid and necessary changes are implemented, and that the project scope is aligned with the project objectives and stakeholder expectations. References:

• A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 2.2.3, page 27
• PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain III: Executing, Task 8

= The project manager should take the following actions to fulfill the scenario without adding costs for the customer:

• Create a change request with the scope of the new internal projects. This is necessary to document and communicate the changes in the project scope and obtain approval from the relevant stakeholders. The change request should also include the impact analysis of the new scope on the project schedule, cost, quality, and risk.
• Manage the quality of the delivery. This is important to ensure that the new internal projects meet the quality standards and expectations of the customer and the project sponsor. The project manager should implement quality assurance and quality control processes to monitor and measure the quality performance of the project deliverables and processes.
• Create a work breakdown structure (WBS) of the new scope with the internal projects. This is a useful tool to decompose the project scope into manageable components and define the work packages and activities required to complete the project. The WBS also helps to assign responsibilities, estimate resources, and create the project schedule and budget.
• Option A is not a good action, as it may not be feasible or desirable for the client to initiate a new project. It may also create additional risks and issues for the project manager and the project team.
• Option C is not a good action, as it may not be sufficient or appropriate to use the project’s contingency budget for the new internal projects. The contingency budget is intended to cover the costs of unforeseen events or risks that may affect the project. The new internal projects are not unforeseen, but planned changes that should have their own budget allocation.

 According to the PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, the project manager should balance the creation and maintenance of project artifacts with the delivery of project outcomes. Project artifacts are useful for planning, monitoring, controlling, and communicating project work, but they are not the primary goal of the project. The project manager should advise the team that focusing too much on artifacts may result in losing sight of the customer needs, stakeholder expectations,and project value. The project manager should also help the team to prioritize and streamline the project artifacts based on their relevance, usefulness, and necessity for the project success1. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, Chapter 3: Project Performance Domain, Section 3.1: Plan, Page 55.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 123, the project manager is responsible for managing the project scope and ensuring that the project deliverables meet the agreed requirements and expectations of the customer and other stakeholders. If the project manager receives a request for a change in the project scope, such as the parking lot size, the project manager should follow the change management process, which involves assessing the impact of the change on the project objectives, constraints, and assumptions, and consulting with the executive sponsors and other key stakeholders to determine the best course of action. The project manager should not reject, accept, or implement the change without following the changemanagement process, as this may lead to scope creep, rework, waste, or poor quality. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 123
• Free PMP Practice Exam Questions - 120 Sample Test Questions