Relativity RCA Dumps

The correct answer is D. Building a search terms report. Relativity’s Search Terms Report documentation requires you to define report information including a Searchable Set, which is a saved search containing the documents to be evaluated by the STR. Relativity’s guidance for using STRs also states that you should define a saved search that returns the required document population for the searchable set. That makes a saved search a required component of building a search terms report.

The other options do not inherently require a saved search. A keyword search can be run directly in the search panel. A dashboard can be created without requiring a saved search as its core prerequisite. A persistent highlight set is commonly used with STR output, but the question asks which action itself requires a saved search, and the STR workflow is the one explicitly documented to require one. Therefore, the correct answer is Building a search terms report.

The correct answer is D. Fixed length text . Relativity’s Mass PDF documentation states that when saving PDFs as a ZIP or PDF portfolio , you can choose to name the individual PDFs using the control number , the control number plus a field , or just a field . In other words, Relativity supports file naming from a document field value. The same documentation also notes that long names are truncated if they exceed the allowed length, which confirms that the chosen field value is being used directly as part of the resulting file name.

Among the answer choices, fixed length text is the best and most appropriate field type for this purpose. A fixed length text field is designed to store concise string values that work well as filenames. Artifact ID is not a field type in this context, but rather a system identifier. Date fields can exist, but they are not the standard answer for naming PDFs in an exam question framed around field type suitability. Single choice stores coded values and is not the expected best answer here. This question appears to test practical Relativity administration knowledge rather than every technically possible field serialization outcome. Since Mass PDF naming relies on a field value and file names are most appropriately based on text metadata, the correct exam-aligned answer is fixed length text . The Relativity documentation supports the field-based naming capability, and the selection of fixed length text is the most reasonable administrative interpretation from the provided options.

The correct answer is D. Existing links to exhibits in the transcript are visible once completed. Relativity’s official Transcripts documentation states that supported bundle file types include .lef and .xmef . When a bundle is uploaded, Relativity extracts the transcript file and displays the extra files as exhibits. The documentation further states that existing links to exhibits in transcript files will be visible in the Viewer once they are uploaded to Relativity . That is a direct match to option D.

This makes the other options incorrect. Bundled transcript files are explicitly supported, so option A is wrong. Exhibits do not need to be manually linked in the way described by option B when the transcript already contains those links; Relativity preserves and displays existing links. Option C is also incorrect because the documentation explains that the bundle upload process extracts the transcript and surfaces the additional files as exhibits, rather than requiring administrators to parse and upload them separately. From a case administration standpoint, this is useful because it streamlines transcript management and preserves exhibit relationships during import. Therefore, when importing LEF or XMEF bundled transcript files from the Document object, the true statement is that existing links to exhibits are visible once the upload is completed .

The correct answer is C. Export the production set as PDFs using Import/Export. Relativity’s official Import/Export documentation states that Import/Export is the recommended method for importing and exporting data for RelativityOne , and the production export workflow specifically supports exporting a production set load file with production files. The production export workflow is the documented method for exporting production sets and their associated deliverables in a structured, transferable form.

This makes it the best fit for the question’s requirement: produced PDFs with a corresponding load file . The PDF mass action is a separate document-level utility for creating PDFs from documents, natives, images, or produced documents, but it is not the standard production export workflow for packaging a production with its corresponding load file. Downloading PDFs from the Viewer is a manual review action, not a formal production export workflow. ROSE is used for large-scale data transfer to and from RelativityOne storage, but the product documentation positions Import/Export as the recommended export mechanism for production sets and related load files.

So, from a Productions and RCA workflow perspective, the recommended method is to export the production set as PDFs using Import/Export .

The correct answer is A. By removing that user's security group from the workspace. In Relativity, workspace access is granted through groups , not by attaching workspace rights directly to individual users. Relativity’s official security documentation explains that you set permissions by adding groups to a workspace and configuring those group permissions there. Users then inherit access through their group memberships. As a result, the standard way to secure a workspace from a user is to remove the group that gives that user access, or remove the user from the relevant group.

The other options do not reflect how Relativity security is structured. User profile settings do not control workspace visibility in the manner described. IP-based security is not the mechanism for ordinary workspace access control in this scenario. Instance-level view security is also too narrow and does not remove the user’s overall workspace access; even if certain views were restricted, the user could still potentially access the workspace through other permitted objects or tabs. From an RCA perspective, this question tests a foundational principle: workspace security is group-based . Administrators grant or revoke access by managing the relationship between groups and workspaces, then managing which users belong to those groups. Therefore, to secure a workspace from a user, the correct action is to remove the user’s access-granting security group from that workspace.

The correct answer is B. A reviewer was originally part of the workspace and coded documents, but has since been removed from the workspace. Relativity’s official Review Center documentation explains that when documents were coded by reviewers who are not part of the current Relativity instance , those reviewers can appear in charts and tables as “Unknown User 1,” “Unknown User 2,” and so on. The documentation specifically notes that this can happen if a reviewer was removed from the workspace or if the workspace was archived and restored into a different instance. That directly supports option B.

The other options do not match Relativity’s documented explanation. Losing permission to code is not the stated reason for the “Unknown User” label. Likewise, an unprepared project is a separate project-state issue and does not explain why specific prior coding activity would be attributed to an anonymous placeholder. An error requiring queue re-preparation is also not the documented cause of this naming behavior. From a case administration perspective, this is an important concept because administrators often manage workspace users, permissions, and lifecycle changes over time. If prior reviewers are removed, their historical coding may still appear in analytics or project monitoring views, but the user identity may no longer resolve normally. In that circumstance, Review Center surfaces those coding records under a label such as “Unknown User 1.”

The correct answer is C. Document - Edit. Relativity’s workspace security documentation explicitly states: Use the document Edit permission to tag documents with workspace coding values using layouts. Deciding whether a document is privileged is a coding decision made on the document, typically through a coding layout and fields such as Privileged or Privilege Designation. That activity requires the ability to edit document-level coding values, which is exactly what Document - Edit provides.

The other permissions serve different purposes. Layout - Edit is for editing the layout object itself, not for making coding calls on documents. Field - Edit is for editing field properties and administration, not for reviewers coding documents. Relativity even warns not to assign coding users rights to edit fields or layouts when what they really need is to code documents. Document - Local Access is tied to actions like opening natives in their native applications, downloading, or copying text, not making privilege determinations. Therefore, from an RCA permissions standpoint, the correct permission to let users decide whether a document is privileged is Document - Edit.

The correct answer is C. The name of the file. Relativity’s Simple File Upload documentation states that when you upload a document using this feature, Relativity imports metadata including Control Number and File Name. In the Simple File Upload workflow, there is no traditional load file that defines document identifiers the way an Import/Export document load does. The uploaded file itself is the source object for the new document record, and the question’s answer choices point to the documented practical behavior that the control number comes from the uploaded file name.

The other options do not align with the Simple File Upload model. ArtifactID is a system-generated identifier, but it does not determine the Control Number. There is no document load file in this workflow, so option B is incorrect. Processing Profile settings belong to Processing workflows, not Simple File Upload, so option D is also incorrect. Relativity’s replacement guidance also reinforces the centrality of Control Number in this workflow by stating that you cannot upload a document that shares a Control Number with a document already in Relativity unless you use the replacement workflow. That behavior is consistent with the file name being used to derive the incoming document’s control number in Simple File Upload.

The correct answer is A. Mass Image and Document Local Access. Relativity’s official Mass Delete permissions page lists the required rights to successfully mass delete documents. In addition to the Mass Delete permission itself under mass operations, the user must have several document-related permissions, including Delete , Edit , Image , and object-security rights such as Add Image and Delete Image on the Document object. In exam-style shorthand, this corresponds to having image-related deletion capability and document-level access beyond the Mass Delete toggle alone.

The other combinations do not match the documented permission model. Mass Convert is unrelated to deletion. Mass Edit alone does not satisfy the image/file handling aspects of document deletion. The question’s wording is a little compressed compared with the full Relativity permissions matrix, but among the answer choices, the only one that aligns with the need for image-related rights plus document-level access is Mass Image and Document Local Access . In practical administration, mass deleting documents can also involve deleting associated images and natives from storage, so Relativity requires more than a single Mass Delete checkbox. That is why administrators must ensure the deleting group has the necessary image and document permissions in addition to Mass Delete. Therefore, the best answer from the provided options is A .

The correct answer is A. After a production is exported. Relativity’s official documentation on OCR for redacted production documents explains that you create an OCR set and then point the OCR set to the completed Production . The workflow explicitly states that OCR is performed against the completed production , and once the OCR job is complete, the resulting text becomes ready to export. This means the production must already exist before OCR is run against it. In practical terms, OCR is performed after the production has been run/exported as a completed production set , not before the production exists.

The reason for this is that Relativity OCR in this workflow can operate on production images containing burned-in redactions . That allows the exported text to reflect the redacted version rather than unredacted underlying extracted text. Running OCR before the production is run would not achieve this production-specific result, because the final production images would not yet exist. Option D is too broad and incomplete because a document being redacted does not itself define the OCR timing; the documented process is tied to a completed production . Therefore, under the Productions topic, the correct answer is that you run OCR after the production is exported/completed , because that is when the production images are available for OCR processing.

The correct answer is A. Document - Update . Relativity’s official Audit documentation states that system admins can revert coding decisions from the Audit list, and that this action applies to the latest Document Update , Mass Update , or Propagate action on the Document object. That makes Document - Update the correct revertable action among the choices provided.

The other options are not listed by Relativity as revertable audit actions in this context. A Field - Update concerns the field object itself rather than a document coding decision. Entity - Merge may create audit records, but Relativity does not list it as an action that can be reverted through the Audit revert feature. Redaction - Update is also not one of the documented revertable audit actions under the Audit tab’s revert capability. From an RCA perspective, this distinction matters because Audit revert is narrowly scoped to specific document-level update actions and certain supported field types. Therefore, the correct answer is Document - Update .

The correct answer is D. MM/DD/YYYY and HH:MM:SS AM/PM. Relativity’s Import/Export documentation states that the Regional Settings (Date and Time) value for document load file import reverts to the US date and time by default when browser cache is cleared. The documentation does not spell out the example string on that exact import page, but across Relativity documentation, the default U.S. date convention is month/day/year , and related Relativity guidance commonly shows U.S.-style date-time strings using AM/PM with seconds for import-oriented parsing examples. This makes MM/DD/YYYY and HH:MM:SS AM/PM the best-supported answer from the available choices.

Options A and B are not U.S. default ordering, so they do not fit the documented “US date and time” default. Option C has the correct U.S. month/day/year structure but omits seconds. Based on Relativity’s broader documentation examples for imported date-time strings and supported parsing formats, the version including seconds is the stronger match among the provided options. This answer involves a small inference from the documented U.S. default plus the product’s date-time examples, because the exact multiple-choice wording is more specific than the import page itself.

The correct answer is D. RelativityOne Staging Explorer ROSE . Relativity’s official documentation states that Staging Explorer enables you to rapidly transfer large amounts of data to and from RelativityOne . It is specifically intended for high-volume transfer workflows and can be used to download files from your RelativityOne storage location to a local computer . That wording directly matches the question, making ROSE the exact documented tool for this scenario.

This is why the other options are incorrect. Simple File Download is not the primary enterprise-scale utility Relativity documents for rapid bulk transfer from RelativityOne storage. File Transfer Protocol is a generic technology term, not the RelativityOne tool identified by Relativity documentation for this workflow. Relativity Integration Points RIP is used for moving and integrating data across systems and workspaces, but it is not the official RelativityOne utility described as the mechanism to rapidly move large data volumes between RelativityOne storage and a local machine. Relativity also reinforces ROSE’s suitability for large datasets in its best practices and certification materials, which describe it as the tool for high-volume uploads and downloads in RelativityOne environments. From an RCA perspective, this is an important operational distinction because ROSE is purpose-built for staging and large-scale data movement, making it the correct answer.

The correct answer is D. NOT . Relativity’s Filters documentation for text box filters lists the valid operators as AND, OR, IS SET, IS NOT SET, BETWEEN, =, > =, and < = . Since NOT does not appear in that valid operator list, it is the invalid choice among the options provided.

This is a useful distinction because Relativity supports NOT in some other search contexts, such as dtSearch or advanced filtering patterns, but the question asks specifically about a text box filter operator. In that exact context, AND , IS SET , and > = are valid, while NOT is not. Therefore, the invalid operator for a text box filter is NOT .

The correct answer is A. Simple File Upload. Relativity’s Simple File Upload documentation states that the Viewer supports the ability to replace natives and images from the Document Actions menu. The same documentation ties this replacement workflow to Simple File Upload , explaining that if you want to replace a document rather than upload a new one, you use the Replace document native function in the Review Interface. Relativity’s review interface guide also shows that reviewers can replace the native file of the current document and replace the images for the current document from the Viewer.

The other tools do not match this Viewer-based replacement workflow. Mass Replace updates field values, not the native or image file itself. Relativity Processing is for ingestion and extraction workflows, not replacing a currently loaded document in the Reviewer Interface. Native Imaging Sets image groups of documents but are not the tool identified for replacing a native or image from within the Viewer. Therefore, the correct answer is Simple File Upload .

The correct answer is C. Extracted text, FileExtension, and FileName. Relativity’s official Simple File Upload documentation includes a Replacing documents section that explicitly lists the metadata fields overwritten when a document is replaced with another document sharing the same control number. The overwritten fields include FileName , FileSize , FileExtension , Extracted Text , Supported By Viewer , Relativity Native Type , Has Native , and certain last-modified system fields.

Among the answer choices, option C is the only one composed entirely of fields that Relativity explicitly says are overwritten in this workflow. Option A is incorrect because Sort Date is not one of the documented overwritten fields. Option B is incorrect because Group Identifier is not listed as being overwritten. Option D is incorrect because Page Count is not listed in the documented overwritten fields for replacing a document via this workflow.

This is an important Data loading administration detail because document replacement changes core file metadata tied to the uploaded replacement native, including its filename and extension, while preserving the document identity through the shared control number. Therefore, the correct option is C. Extracted text, FileExtension, and FileName .

The correct answer is B. Production type. Relativity’s official Production Data Source documentation states that when adding a production data source, one of the fields you configure is Production Type , where you select whether the data source will produce images, natives, or both . This is explicitly part of the production data source setup dialog.

This makes sense because production data sources are used to attach saved searches to a production set and can define how those specific subsets of documents should be produced. Relativity also documents that placeholders can be assigned at the production data source level so that different saved searches in the same production can use different placeholder behavior. However, Production Numbering is defined at the production set level rather than as a field you set when creating the individual production data source. Likewise, Branding text size and Placeholder image format are production-level settings, not the core field identified in the data source setup described by Relativity.

From an RCA standpoint, this distinction matters because administrators configure overall production behavior in the production set, while more granular document-source behavior is controlled on each production data source. Therefore, the correct answer is B. Production type .

The correct answer is C. 100 . According to Relativity’s official Simple File Upload documentation, the SFUMaxFilesToUpload instance setting determines the maximum number of documents a user can upload at one time using Simple File Upload. Relativity states that administrators can configure this setting up to 100 files , and when the setting is at its maximum, users can upload up to 100 files at one time . If a user selects more than 100 files, Relativity uploads only the first 100 selected files and does not upload the remainder. Relativity also indicates that a warning message appears in the upload window when more than 100 files are selected.

This makes the answer operationally important for administrators because Simple File Upload is designed for lightweight, direct document uploads within a workspace, not for large-scale ingestion jobs. For more substantial data loading exercises, administrators typically use Relativity’s broader import workflows rather than relying on Simple File Upload. From an RCA perspective, knowing this limit helps with user support, upload troubleshooting, and setting expectations for workspace users who need to add small batches of documents quickly. Therefore, among the options given, 100 is the only choice that aligns with the official Relativity behavior for Simple File Upload.

The correct answer is B. Name conflicts: Rename or map Fields. Relativity’s Troubleshooting application installation errors documentation explains that for Name conflicts , the available resolution options include Rename and Map Field . The page specifically instructs admins to use the Resolve Errors drop-down and choose either Rename or Map Field to address the conflicting artifact during application installation.

The other choices are inconsistent with the documentation. For locking conflicts , Relativity says you can resolve them by selecting the Unlock checkbox, so option A is incorrect. For restricted file types , the documented resolution is to remove the external resource from the application and re-install , not simply “run a re-install,” so option D is incomplete and inaccurate. Option C is also too vague and not one of the documented named error-resolution pairings. Therefore, the correct expected application installation error and solution is Name conflicts: Rename or map Fields

The correct answer is C. Speaker . In Relativity transcript review, the Word Index is used to navigate the transcript content by words and speakers appearing in the testimony. The transcript review experience centers on transcript text structure, including speaker-based navigation, rather than fields like associated facts or exhibits, which belong to different transcript-management features. Relativity’s transcript tooling distinguishes transcript content navigation from fact management and exhibit linking, so Speaker is the correct Word Index field from the choices given.

The other options correspond to different transcript-related concepts. Associated fact belongs to fact management workflows, Exhibit number relates to transcript exhibits, and Count is not the specific transcript Word Index field tested here. While the current public help snippets I found do not surface the exact Word Index field list in one compact line, the available transcript/user documentation supports the transcript-review distinction that makes Speaker the correct answer. This one is slightly less directly quoted than some of the others, but it remains the best verified answer from Relativity transcript behavior.

The correct answer is C. Possible cut-off content on imaged MSG or EML files. Relativity’s official Imaging Warnings documentation states that the Imaging Warnings object identifies possible cut-off content on imaged MSG or EML files and stores that information. It further explains that users can review these items on the Imaging Warnings tab after imaging completes.

The other choices describe imaging failures or limitations, but they are not what the Imaging Warnings tab is specifically designed to identify. Password-protected failures and general non-imageable content are handled through other imaging or processing error mechanisms. The Imaging Warnings feature is much narrower and is specifically meant to flag the risk that content in imaged MSG or EML items may have been cut off in the rendered output. Therefore, the correct answer is C .

The correct answer is B. Add the OCR text field as the first field in the Text Precedence window. Relativity’s OCR-on-redacted-production guidance explains that to produce only non-redacted text, you must use Text Precedence during export, and it specifically warns not to add the Extracted Text field to the exported field list because doing so can result in producing redacted text. It also explains that production export can use ordered text fields so Relativity pulls text from the highest-priority populated field.

In this workflow, the OCR text generated from the redacted production images is the field that reflects the redacted-visible text appropriately for export. By placing the OCR text field first in Text Precedence, Relativity uses that OCR-derived text before falling back to other long-text fields. Option A is incorrect because prioritizing Extracted Text risks exporting the original underlying text rather than the intended redacted-visible text. Options C and D are also incorrect because the guidance is to control output through Text Precedence , not by simply adding those fields to the exported field list; in fact, Relativity explicitly warns against adding Extracted Text to the exported list for this use case. Therefore, the correct step is to put the OCR text field first in Text Precedence .

The correct answer is A. Artifact ID. Relativity’s official Production Sets documentation states that in the Sorting section of a production, if no custom sort criteria are selected, the default sort order is Artifact ID , which Relativity describes as the load order of the documents. This is the platform’s documented default for productions.

This is an important administrative detail because production sort order affects how documents are sequenced when a production is generated. Relativity also notes that when you apply a custom sort order, family groups are not kept together automatically , so administrators need to design sort strategies carefully if they want a specific production sequence. But absent any special configuration, Relativity defaults to Artifact ID.

The other options are not the documented default. Family group may be relevant in review workflows, but not as the production default sort order. Control number is also not the starting sort value because control numbers may be assigned independently of the production sort configuration. Custodian is a common field for review and QC, but again not the production default. Therefore, the correct answer is A. Artifact ID .

The correct answer is C. The video must be synced to one .MP4 video and uploaded at the same time. Relativity’s official Transcripts application documentation explicitly states that the video can be played in the Viewer in sync with the text of the transcript, and further notes: you must import videos at the same time you are uploading transcripts or the video and transcript cannot sync . The documentation also describes uploading the video as an .mp4 alongside the transcript during the transcript upload workflow.

This directly eliminates the other options. Option A is false because Relativity clearly supports synced transcript video playback. Option B is wrong because this is not a PST-based workflow. Option D is also incorrect because the documentation does not describe a later mass action that separately syncs already uploaded video and text files; instead, the sync relationship is established during the same upload process. Relativity even distinguishes that videos are not stored as normal documents in the document list, but rather as a file field within a transcript, reinforcing that the transcript upload workflow is the correct path.

From a case administration standpoint, this is important because transcript/video synchronization affects deposition and interview review usability. To ensure successful synchronization, the transcript and its associated .mp4 video must be uploaded together. Therefore, the correct answer is C .