Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Dumps

Explanation

Correct Answer: Traffic between Mule applications deployed to an Anypoint VPC and on-premises systems can stay within a private network

*****************************************

>> The private IP address range of an Anypoint VPC is NOT automatically chosen by CloudHub. It is chosen by us at the time of creating VPC using thr CIDR blocks.

CIDR Block: The size of the Anypoint VPC in Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) notation.

For example, if you set it to 10.111.0.0/24, the Anypoint VPC is granted 256 IP addresses from 10.111.0.0 to 10.111.0.255.

Ideally, the CIDR Blocks you choose for the Anypoint VPC come from a private IP space, and should not overlap with any other Anypoint VPC’s CIDR Blocks, or any CIDR Blocks in use in your corporate network.

that each CloudHub environment requires a separate Anypoint VPC. Once an Anypoint VPC is created, we can choose a same VPC by multiple environments. However, it is generally a best and recommended practice to always have seperate Anypoint VPCs for Non-Prod and Prod environments.

>> We use Anypoint VPN to link the underlying AWS VPC to an on-premises (non AWS) private network. NOT VPC Peering.

Scenario Analysis:

The API implementation is experiencing high CPU usage (over 90%) during bursts of requests, which correlates with slow response times, as indicated by a 99th percentile response time greater than 120 seconds.

The API implementation is running on Anypoint Runtime Fabric with two non-clustered replicas and has a reserved vCPU of 1.0 and a vCPU limit of 2.0.

The high CPU usage during bursts suggests that the current resources may not be sufficient to handle peak loads.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A (Correct Answer): Increasing the vCPU resources for each replica would provide more processing power to handle high traffic volumes, potentially reducing the response time during spikes. Since the CPU usage is consistently high during bursts, this option directly addresses the resource bottleneck.

Option B: Modifying the API client to split requests may reduce individual request load but could be complex to implement on the client side and may not fully address the high CPU issue.

Option C: Increasing the number of replicas could help distribute the load; however, with a high CPU load on each replica, adding more replicas without increasing CPU resources may not fully resolve the problem.

Option D: Throttling the client would reduce the number of requests, but this may not be acceptable if the client needs to maintain a high request rate. It also does not directly address the CPU limitations of the API implementation.

Conclusion:

Option A is the best choice as it addresses the root cause of high CPU usage by increasing the vCPU allocation, allowing the API to handle more requests efficiently. This should be pursued first before considering other options.

Refer to MuleSoft’s documentation on Runtime Fabric and vCPU resource allocation for more details on optimizing API performance in high-demand environments.

To achieve the goal of exposing financial data to a new mobile application while following MuleSoft’s best practices, the company should follow an API-led connectivity approach. This approach ensures minimal disruption to existing clients, maximizes reusability, and respects the separation of concerns across API layers.

Explanation of Solution:

Experience APIs for Client-Specific Requirements:

Create two new Experience APIs (EAPI-1 and EAPI-2) for the mobile application, tailored to meet the specific data and format requirements of the mobile application. These APIs encapsulate the client-specific needs and provide a custom interface without impacting other clients.

Process API Layer for Data Transformation:

By adding Mobile PAPI-2, we allow the mobile application to access the required subset of data, formatted according to the mobile application’s requirements. This approach ensures that data transformation and aggregation are handled in the Process layer, maintaining consistency and reusability across different applications.

Reuse of System APIs:

Both the new Mobile PAPI-2 and existing PAPI-1 access data from System APIs (SAPI-1 and SAPI-2), which continue to expose data from each legacy system in a consistent, reusable manner. This avoids duplicating logic and ensures that data access remains centralized and manageable.

Why Option A is Correct:

Option A aligns with MuleSoft’s best practices by isolating client-specific requirements in the Experience layer, utilizing Process APIs for data orchestration and transformation, and maintaining reusable System APIs for backend access.

This approach also ensures that the current API clients are not impacted, as new clients (e.g., the mobile app) interact with newly defined Experience APIs without modifying the existing API setup.

Explanation of Incorrect Options:

Option B: This option seems similar but lacks clarity on the separation of mobile-specific requirements and does not explicitly mention data transformation, which is essential in this scenario.

Option C: Creating a single mobile Experience API that exposes a subset of PAPI endpoints directly adds unnecessary complexity and may violate the separation of concerns, as transformation logic should not be in the Experience layer.

Option D: Deploying a new PAPI and using an API Proxy to redirect existing endpoints would add unnecessary complexity, disrupt the current API clients, and increase maintenance efforts.

ReferencesFor additional guidance, refer to MuleSoft documentation on API-led connectivity best practices and best practices for structuring Experience, Process, and System APIs​​.

Explanation

Correct Answer: To invoke OAuth 2.0-protected APIs managed by Anypoint Platform, API clients must submit access tokens issued by that same Identity Provider

*****************************************

>> It is NOT necessary that single sign-on is required to sign in to Anypoint Platform because we are using an external Identity Provider for Client Management

>> It is NOT necessary that all APIs managed by Anypoint Platform must be protected by SAML 2.0 policies because we are using an external Identity Provider for Client Management

>> Not TRUE that the application network must include System APIs that interact with the Identity Provider because we are using an external Identity Provider for Client Management

Only TRUE statement in the given options is - "To invoke OAuth 2.0-protected APIs managed by Anypoint Platform, API clients must submit access tokens issued by that same Identity Provider"

To create a unified schema in MuleSoft's DataGraph, APIs must be exposed in a way that allows DataGraph to pull and consolidate data from these APIs into a single schema accessible to consumers. DataGraph provides a federated approach, combining multiple APIs to form a single, unified API endpoint.

In this setup:

APIs 1, 2, 3, and 4 are suitable candidates for DataGraph because they are hosted within the Customer VPC on CloudHub and are accessible either through a Shared Load Balancer (LB) or a Dedicated Load Balancer (DLB). Both of these load balancers provide public access, which is a necessary condition for DataGraph as it must access the APIs to aggregate data.

APIs 5 and 6 are hosted on Customer Hosted Server 2, which is explicitly marked as "Not public". Since DataGraph requires API access through a publicly reachable endpoint to aggregate them into a unified schema, APIs 5 and 6 cannot be used with DataGraph in this configuration.

APIs 3 and 4 on Customer Hosted Server 1 appear accessible through a Shared LB, implying public accessibility that meets DataGraph’s requirements.

By combining APIs 1, 2, 3, and 4 within DataGraph, you can create a unified schema that enables clients to query data seamlessly from all these APIs as if it were from a single source.

This setup allows for efficient data retrieval and can simplify API consumption by reducing the need to call multiple APIs individually, thus optimizing performance and developer experience.

ReferencesFor more detailed information on setting up and managing unified schemas in DataGraph, refer to the DataWeave documentation and MuleSoft DataGraph resources which provide in-depth guidelines on schema aggregation and API federation​​.

Explanation

Correct Answer: Set a timeout of 100ms; that leaves 400ms for other two downstream APIs to complete

*****************************************

Key details to take from the given scenario:

>> Upstream API's designed SLA is 500ms (median). Lets ignore maximum SLA response times.

>> This API calls 3 downstream APIs sequentially and all these are of similar complexity.

>> The first downstream API is offering median SLA of 100ms, 80th percentile: 500ms; 95th percentile: 1000ms.

Based on the above details:

>> We can rule out the option which is suggesting to set 50ms timeout. Because, if the median SLA itself being offered is 100ms then most of the calls are going to timeout and time gets wasted in retried them and eventually gets exhausted with all retries. Even if some retries gets successful, the remaining time wont leave enough room for 2nd and 3rd downstream APIs to respond within time.

>> The option suggesting to NOT set a timeout as the invocation of this API is mandatory and so we must wait until it responds is silly. As not setting time out would go against the good implementation pattern and moreover if the first API is not responding within its offered median SLA 100ms then most probably it would either respond in 500ms (80th percentile) or 1000ms (95th percentile). In BOTH cases, getting a successful response from 1st downstream API does NO GOOD because already by this time the Upstream API SLA of 500 ms is breached. There is no time left to call 2nd and 3rd downstream APIs.

>> It is NOT true that no timeout is possible to meet the upstream APIs desired SLA.

As 1st downstream API is offering its median SLA of 100ms, it means MOST of the time we would get the responses within that time. So, setting a timeout of 100ms would be ideal for MOST calls as it leaves enough room of 400ms for remaining 2 downstream API calls.

Explanation

Correct Answer: Invoke the system API deployed to the primary environment; add timeout and retry logic to the process API to avoid intermittent failures; if it still fails, invoke the system API deployed to the DR environment

*****************************************

There is one important consideration to be noted in the question which is - System API in DR environment provides only 20% of the rate limiting offered by the primary environment. So, comparitively, very less calls will be allowed into the DR environment API opposed to its primary environment. With this in mind, lets analyse what is the right and best fault-tolerant invocation strategy.

1. Invoking both the system APIs in parallel is definitely NOT a feasible approach because of the 20% limitation we have on DR environment. Calling in parallel every time would easily and quickly exhaust the rate limits on DR environment and may not give chance to genuine intermittent error scenarios to let in during the time of need.

2. Another option given is suggesting to add timeout and retry logic to process API while invoking primary environment's system API. This is good so far. However, when all retries failed, the option is suggesting to invoke the copy of process API on DR environment which is not right or recommended. Only system API is the one to be considered for fallback and not the whole process API. Process APIs usually have lot of heavy orchestration calling many other APIs which we do not want to repeat again by calling DR's process API. So this option is NOT right.

3. One more option given is suggesting to add the retry (no timeout) logic to process API to directly retry on DR environment's system API instead of retrying the primary environment system API first. This is not at all a proper fallback. A proper fallback should occur only after all retries are performed and exhausted on Primary environment first. But here, the option is suggesting to directly retry fallback API on first failure itself without trying main API. So, this option is NOT right too.

This leaves us one option which is right and best fit.

- Invoke the system API deployed to the primary environment

- Add Timeout and Retry logic on it in process API

- If it fails even after all retries, then invoke the system API deployed to the DR environment.

When managing high traffic to an API, especially with POST requests, it is crucial to ensure the API’s policies both protect the back-end systems and provide a smooth client experience. Here’s the approach to reducing errors:

Rate Limiting Policy: This policy enforces a limit on the number of requests within a defined time period. However, rate limiting alone may cause clients to hit limits during demand surges, leading to errors.

Adding an SLA-based Spike Control Policy:

Spike Control is designed to handle sudden increases in traffic by smoothing out bursts of requests, which is particularly useful during high-demand periods.

By configuring SLA-based Spike Control, you can define thresholds for specific client tiers. For instance, premium clients might have higher limits or more flexibility in traffic bursts than standard clients.

Why Option D is Correct:

Keeping the Rate Limiting policy continues to provide baseline protection for the back-end.

Adding the SLA-based Spike Control policy allows for differentiated control, where requests are queued or delayed during bursts rather than outright rejected. This approach significantly reduces error responses to clients while still controlling overall traffic.

Explanation of Incorrect Options:

Option A (adding Client ID Enforcement) would not reduce errors related to traffic surges.

Option B (HTTP Caching) is not applicable as caching is generally ineffective for non-idempotent requests like POST.

Option C (only Spike Control without Rate Limiting) may leave the back-end system vulnerable to sustained high traffic levels, reducing protection.

ReferencesFor more information on configuring Rate Limiting and SLA-based Spike Control policies, refer to MuleSoft documentation on API Policies and Rate Limiting​​.

Explanation

Correct Answer: A Non-Mule application

*****************************************

>> All type of Mule applications (Mule 3/ Mule 4/ with APIkit/ with Custom Java Code etc) running on Mule Runtimes support the Embedded Policy Enforcement on them.

>> The only option that cannot have or does not support embedded policy enforcement and must have API Proxy is for Non-Mule Applications.

So, Non-Mule application is the right answer.

Explanation

Correct Answer: A CloudHub worker fails with an out-of-memory exception.

*****************************************

>> An AWS Region itself going down will definitely result in an outage as it does not matter how many workers are assigned to the Mule App as all of those in that region will go down. This is a complete downtime and outage.

>> Extended outage of API manager during initial deployment of API implementation will of course cause issues in proper application startup itself as the API Autodiscovery might fail or API policy templates and polices may not be downloaded to embed at the time of applicaiton startup etc... there are many reasons that could cause issues.

>> A network outage onpremises would of course cause the Order Management System not accessible and it does not matter how many workers are assigned to the app they all will fail and cause outage for sure.

The only option that does NOT result in a service outage is if a cloudhub worker fails with an out-of-memory exception. Even if a worker fails and goes down, there are still other workers to handle the requests and keep the API UP and Running. So, this is the right answer.

In MuleSoft’s ecosystem, when a Process API needs to consume a System API (published to Exchange and protected by OAuth 2.0), the recommended approach is to utilize the REST Connect Connector. Here’s how it aligns with best practices:

Automated Connector Generation:

When a RAML or OAS specification is published in Exchange, MuleSoft automatically generates a REST Connect Connector for that API. This connector simplifies integration as it abstracts the complexity of making HTTP requests and handling OAuth authentication.

Streamlined Integration:

The Process API can import this generated connector from Exchange and configure OAuth credentials, streamlining secure access to the System API without manual HTTP setup.

Why Option C is Correct:

Using the REST Connect Connector directly leverages MuleSoft’s automated tooling, minimizing manual configurations and ensuring a more maintainable integration.

Explanation of Incorrect Options:

Option A (importing an OAuth module) is unnecessary; OAuth is handled within the connector’s configuration.

Option B (property YAML files with HTTP requests) involves manual setup, which is more error-prone and not recommended.

Option D (manually updating POM file) does not directly aid in invoking an API through Exchange.

ReferencesFor more information on using REST Connect Connectors and OAuth integration in MuleSoft, refer to the MuleSoft documentation on API Management and Connectors​​.

Explanation

Correct Answer: They provide an additional layer of resilience on top of the underlying backend system, thereby insulating clients from extended failure of these systems.

*****************************************

In API-led connectivity,

>> Experience APIs - allow for innovation at the user interface level by consuming the underlying assets without being aware of how data is being extracted from backend systems.

>> Process APIs - compose data from various sources and combine them with orchestration logic to create higher level value

>> System APIs - reduce the dependency on the underlying backend systems by helping unlock data from backend systems in a reusable and consumable way.

However, they NEVER promise that they provide an additional layer of resilience on top of the underlying backend system, thereby insulating clients from extended failure of these systems.

CloudHub Object Store v2 is a managed key-value store provided by MuleSoft to support various use cases where temporary data storage is required. Here’s why Option D is correct:

Key Length Support: Object Store v2 allows storage of keys with a length of up to 300 characters, making it suitable for applications needing flexible and descriptive keys.

Limitations on Size:

Object Store v2 is not intended for large payload storage and has a recommended size limit below 10 MB for each value. Payloads exceeding 15 MB may cause performance issues and are better suited to a file storage system or database.

Option B is incorrect because storing payloads above 15 MB exceeds Object Store’s optimal usage specifications.

Key-Value Limits: Object Store v2 is designed for moderate, transient storage needs, and does not support unlimited storage. Thus, Option A is incorrect.

Backward Compatibility: Object Store v2 does not support Mule 4 applications running Object Store v1. Option C is incorrect as Object Store v1 and v2 are distinct.

ReferencesFor more on CloudHub Object Store v2, refer to MuleSoft documentation on Object Store limitations and configuration​.

Explanation

Correct Answer: The remaining capacity allowed by the API implementation.

*****************************************

>> Reference:

Explanation

Correct Answers: API Design and Development and API Runtime Execution and Hosting

*****************************************

>> API Design and Development - Anypoint Studio, Anypoint Design Center, Anypoint Connectors

>> API Runtime Execution and Hosting - Mule Runtimes, CloudHub, Runtime Services

>> API Operations and Management - Anypoint API Manager, Anypoint Exchange

>> API Consumer Management - API Contracts, Public Portals, Anypoint Exchange, API Notebooks

Explanation

Correct Answers: API Operations and Management and API Consumer Engagement

*****************************************

>> API Design and Development - Anypoint Studio, Anypoint Design Center, Anypoint Connectors

>> API Runtime Execution and Hosting - Mule Runtimes, CloudHub, Runtime Services

>> API Operations and Management - Anypoint API Manager, Anypoint Exchange

>> API Consumer Management - API Contracts, Public Portals, Anypoint Exchange, API Notebooks

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

MuleSoft offers various tools to automate the deployment of Mule applications, which can streamline deployment and management processes. Here’s how each tool supports automated deployment:

Runtime Manager:

Anypoint Runtime Manager is MuleSoft’s web-based interface that allows users to deploy, manage, and monitor applications directly. It provides deployment automation through its user-friendly interface.

Anypoint Platform CLI:

The Anypoint CLI enables scripting of deployment and management tasks, making it possible to automate deployments via command-line scripts. This tool is ideal for CI/CD pipelines as it integrates with automated processes.

Platform APIs:

MuleSoft’s Platform APIs allow programmatic access to deployment functions, enabling integration with external automation tools and CI/CD systems. These APIs facilitate deployment through RESTful calls, which can be automated for continuous delivery.

Explanation of Incorrect Options:

Option D (Anypoint Studio) is primarily for development and does not support deployment automation.

Option E (Maven Plugin) can be used for building and deploying Mule applications but isn’t classified as a platform tool for deployment.

Option F (API Community Manager) is unrelated to deployment and instead focuses on managing API communities.

ReferencesFor detailed steps on automating deployments with these tools, refer to MuleSoft documentation on Runtime Manager, CLI, and Platform APIs​.

Explanation

Correct Answer: IP whitelist

*****************************************

>> OAuth 2.0 access token and Client ID enforcement policies are VERY common to apply on Experience APIs as API consumers need to register and access the APIs using one of these mechanisms

>> JSON threat protection is also VERY common policy to apply on Experience APIs to prevent bad or suspicious payloads hitting the API implementations.

>> IP whitelisting policy is usually very common in Process and System APIs to only whitelist the IP range inside the local VPC. But also applied occassionally on some experience APIs where the End User/ API Consumers are FIXED.

>> When we know the API consumers upfront who are going to access certain Experience APIs, then we can request for static IPs from such consumers and whitelist them to prevent anyone else hitting the API.

However, the experience API given in the question/ scenario is intended to work with a consumer mobile phone or tablet application. Which means, there is no way we can know all possible IPs that are to be whitelisted as mobile phones and tablets can so many in number and any device in the city/state/country/globe.

So, It is very LEAST LIKELY to apply IP Whitelisting on such Experience APIs whose consumers are typically Mobile Phones or Tablets.

Explanation

Correct Answer: The API consumer creates an API client, which sends API invocations to an API such that they are processed by an API implementation

*****************************************

Terminology:

>> API Client - It is a piece of code or program the is written to invoke an API

>> API Consumer - An owner/entity who owns the API Client. API Consumers write API clients.

>> API - The provider of the API functionality. Typically an API Instance on API Manager where they are managed and operated.

>> API Implementation - The actual piece of code written by API provider where the functionality of the API is implemented. Typically, these are Mule Applications running on Runtime Manager.

Understanding Anypoint Monitoring and Its Capabilities:

Anypoint Monitoring provides comprehensive visibility into Mule applications, offering metrics and analytics such as request counts, response times, CPU utilization, memory usage, and other key performance indicators (KPIs). This tool is designed to help teams monitor API usage, troubleshoot issues, and optimize application performance.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A (Correct Answer): Anypoint Monitoring is the ideal tool for this requirement. It provides real-time insights into metrics such as the number of requests, response times, CPU utilization, and active API usage.

Option B (API Manager): API Manager focuses on API lifecycle management, including applying policies, managing contracts, and setting access controls. It does not provide performance monitoring or KPI tracking.

Option C (Runtime Alerts): Runtime Alerts can notify users of specific conditions, like high CPU usage, but they do not provide a full suite of metrics or insights over a given time period.

Option D (Functional Monitoring): Functional Monitoring focuses on functional testing of APIs rather than performance and usage metrics. It does not provide continuous KPI tracking.

Conclusion:

Option A is the correct answer. Anypoint Monitoring is the most suitable tool to track the specified metrics, providing detailed insights into API requests, response times, CPU usage, and active API counts.

For further details, refer to MuleSoft’s Anypoint Monitoring documentation on configuring dashboards and tracking performance metrics.

Explanation

Correct Answer: XML over HTTP

*****************************************

>> API-led connectivity and Application Networks urge to have the APIs on HTTP based protocols for building most effective APIs and networks on top of them.

>> The HTTP based APIs allow the platform to apply various varities of policies to address many NFRs

>> The HTTP based APIs also allow to implement many standard and effective implementation patterns that adhere to HTTP based w3c rules.

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Explanation

Correct Answer: Bundle properties files for each environment into the Mule API implementation's deployable archive, then promote the Mule API implementation to the Production environment using Anypoint CLI or the Anypoint Platform REST APIs

*****************************************

>> Anypoint Exchange is for asset discovery and documentation. It has got no provision to modify the properties of Mule API implementations at all.

>> API Manager is for managing API instances, their contracts, policies and SLAs. It has also got no provision to modify the properties of API implementations.

>> API policies are to address Non-functional requirements of APIs and has again got no provision to modify the properties of API implementations.

So, the right way and recommended way to do this as part of development practice is to bundle properties files for each environment into the Mule API implementation and just point and refer to respective file per environment.

Explanation

Correct Answer:

1. Decrease the IT delivery gap

2. Meet various business demands without increasing the IT capacity

3. Make consumption of assets at the rate of production.

*****************************************

Explanation

Correct Answer: The credentials provided by the IdP for identity management

*****************************************

Explanation

Correct Answer: Configure a “Worker not responding” alert in Anypoint Runtime Manager.

*****************************************

>> All the options eventually helps to generate the alert required when the application stops responding.

>> However, handling exceptions within calling API and then raising alert from API client is inappropriate and silly. There could be many API clients invoking the API implementation and it is not ideal to have this setup consistently in all of them. Not a realistic way to do.

>> Implementing a health check/ heartbeat with in the API and calling from outside to detmine the health sounds OK but needs extra setup for it and same time there are very good chances of generating false alarms when there are any intermittent network issues between external tool calling the health check API on API implementation. The API implementation itself may not have any issues but due to some other factors some false alarms may go out.

>> Creating an alert in API Manager when the API receives no requests within a specified time period would actually generate realistic alerts but even here some false alarms may go out when there are genuinely no requests from API clients.

The best and right way to achieve this requirement is to setup an alert on Runtime Manager with a condition "Worker not responding". This would generate an alert AS SOON AS the workers become unresponsive.

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Understanding the Requirements:

The business needs to transfer daily data changes from the Salesforce Account and Case objects to AWS DynamoDB in a single JSON format.

Only a subset of attributes (5 from Account and 8 from Case) is required, so it is not necessary to include all 219 attributes of the Account object.

Design Approach:

A System API (SAPI) should be created for each Salesforce object (Account and Case), exposing only the required fields (5 attributes for Account and 8 for Case).

A Process API (PAPI) can be used to aggregate and transform the data from these SAPIs, combining the 13 selected attributes from Account and Case into a single JSON structure for DynamoDB.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A: Mimicking all attributes in the SAPI is inefficient and unnecessary, as only 13 attributes are required.

Option B: Replicating all attributes in DynamoDB is excessive and would result in higher storage and processing costs, which is unnecessary given the requirement for only a subset of attributes.

Option C: Implementing an Enterprise Data Model could be useful in broader data management but is not required here, as the focus is on a lightweight integration.

Option D (Correct Answer): Creating separate entities in SAPI for Account and Case with only the required attributes and using the PAPI to aggregate them into a single JSON is the most efficient and meets the requirements effectively.

Conclusion:

Option D is the best choice as it provides a lightweight, efficient design that meets the requirements by transferring only the necessary attributes and minimizing resource use.

Refer to MuleSoft's best practices for API-led connectivity and data modeling to structure SAPIs and PAPIs efficiently.

Scenario Analysis:

The eCommerce company’s Product Details feature requires low response time and consistent data for a feature where data rarely changes (only once or twice a year).

The database response time is slow due to high volume, so querying the database directly on each request would lead to poor performance and higher response times.

Optimal Solution Requirements:

Low Response Time: Data retrieval should be fast and not depend on database performance.

Fault Tolerance and Data Consistency: Cached or stored data should be consistent and resilient in case of database unavailability, as the product details data changes infrequently.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A: Using a Cache scope would temporarily store the product details in memory, which could improve performance but might not be suitable for infrequent updates (only twice a year), as cache expiration policies typically require shorter durations.

Option B: Storing product details in Anypoint MQ and then retrieving it through a subscriber is not suitable for this use case. Anypoint MQ is better for messaging rather than as a data storage mechanism.

Option C (Correct Answer): Using an object store to store and retrieve product details is ideal. Object stores in MuleSoft are designed for persistent storage of key-value pairs, which allows storing data retrieved from the database initially. This provides quick, consistent access without querying the database on every request, aligning with requirements for low response time, fault tolerance, and data consistency.

Option D: Selecting data directly from the database for each request would not meet the performance requirement due to known slow response times from the database.

Conclusion:

Option C is the best answer, as using an object store allows caching the infrequently updated product details. This approach reduces the dependency on the database, significantly improving response time and ensuring consistent data.

Refer to MuleSoft documentation on Object Store v2 and best practices for data caching to implement this solution effectively.

Explanation

Correct Answer: It makes API Manager aware of API implementations and hence enables it to enforce policies.

*****************************************

>> API Autodiscovery is a mechanism that manages an API from API Manager by pairing the deployed application to an API created on the platform.

>> API Management includes tracking, enforcing policies if you apply any, and reporting API analytics.

>> Critical to the Autodiscovery process is identifying the API by providing the API name and version.

Processing Requirements and Storage Mechanism:

The Reservation Mule application will be deployed to multiple CloudHub workers/replicas, meaning that each worker must share state information to handle records exactly once. This requires a shared storage mechanism where state can be stored and accessed by multiple instances to avoid duplicate processing of the same records.

A Persistent Object Store in Anypoint Platform can be used to store records in a way that is accessible across multiple workers, providing a reliable mechanism for "exactly once" processing.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A (Correct Answer): A Persistent Object Store is designed to retain data across different application instances and can be shared by all workers on CloudHub. It helps achieve idempotency by ensuring that a record is processed exactly once.

Option B: Runtime Fabric Object Store is used for applications deployed in Anypoint Runtime Fabric, not CloudHub. This option would not be compatible with the CloudHub deployment.

Option C: A Non-persistent Object Store does not retain data across application restarts or different instances, making it unsuitable for the requirement of synchronized storage for exactly-once processing.

Option D: An In-memory Mule Object Store is local to each worker and is not shared across instances, so it does not meet the requirement for a shared storage mechanism accessible to all CloudHub workers.

Conclusion:

Option A is the correct answer, as a Persistent Object Store allows data sharing across multiple CloudHub workers, enabling them to synchronize and achieve "exactly once" processing of passenger records with minimal development effort.

Refer to MuleSoft’s documentation on Object Store configurations and usage for best practices on handling state across distributed instances.

Explanation

Correct Answer: Apply a JSON threat protection policy to all APIs to detect potential threat vectors

*****************************************

>> Usually, if the APIs are designed and developed for specific consumers (known consumers/customers) then we would IP Whitelist the same to ensure that traffic only comes from them.

>> However, as this scenario states that the APIs are publicly available and being used by so many mobile and web applications, it is NOT possible to identify and blacklist all possible bad actors.

>> So, JSON threat protection policy is the best chance to prevent any bad JSON payloads from such bad actors.

Given that the application is designed to handle only one process at a time to maintain data consistency, here’s why horizontal scaling won’t increase the processing limit:

Single-Process Constraint:

The application limits to processing one transaction at a time due to its design for consistency, meaning horizontal scaling (adding more workers) does not increase processing speed beyond this limit.

Execution Time:

Since each request takes 200 ms, five requests per second is the maximum processing threshold. Increasing the number of workers does not bypass this single-process limitation.

Explanation of Correct Answer (A):

The scalability remains at five requests per second, as this constraint is intrinsic to the application’s design.

Explanation of Incorrect Options:

Option B suggests a change in execution time, which horizontal scaling does not affect.

Option C assumes doubling the throughput, which isn’t possible due to the single-threaded nature of the application.

Option D suggests horizontal scaling cannot apply, which is incorrect; however, scaling does not increase throughput in this context.

ReferencesFor more on understanding scaling and concurrency in Mule applications, see MuleSoft’s documentation on application performance and scaling limitations​.

Correct Answer: Persistent Object Store

*****************************************

>> Redis distributed cache is performant but NOT out-of-the-box solution in Anypoint Platform

>> File-storage is neither performant nor out-of-the-box solution in Anypoint Platform

>> java.util.WeakHashMap needs a completely custom implementation of cache from scratch using Java code and is limited to the JVM where it is running. Which means the state in the cache is not worker aware when running on multiple workers. This type of cache is local to the worker. So, this is neither out-of-the-box nor worker-aware among multiple workers on cloudhub.

>> Persistent Object Store is an out-of-the-box solution provided by Anypoint Platform which is performant as well as worker aware among multiple workers running on CloudHub.

So, Persistent Object Store is the right answer.

Explanation

Correct Answer: Model all API resources and methods to closely mimic the operations of the backend system.

*****************************************

>> There are NO fixed and straight best practices while opting data models for APIs. They are completly contextual and depends on number of factors. Based upon those factors, an enterprise can choose if they have to go with Enterprise Canonical Data Model or Bounded Context Model etc.

>> One should NEVER expose the technical details of API implementation to their API clients. Only the API interface/ RAML is exposed to API clients.

>> It is true that the RAML definitions of APIs should be as detailed as possible and should reflect most of the documentation. However, just that is NOT enough to call your API as best documented API. There should be even more documentation on Anypoint Exchange with API Notebooks etc. to make and create a developer friendly API and repository..

>> The best practice always when creating System APIs is to create their API interfaces by modeling their resources and methods to closely reflect the operations and functionalities of that backend system.

When defining data models for System APIs without an established Enterprise Data Model, MuleSoft recommends mirroring the back-end systems' data types to achieve quick and effective integration without adding complexity. This approach has several benefits:

Alignment with Backend Systems:

Mirroring data types ensures consistency with backend data sources, which simplifies integration, reduces mapping requirements, and minimizes potential data transformation issues.

Flexibility for Future Enhancements:

By retaining close alignment with backend data structures, System APIs can evolve to support an Enterprise Data Model in the future without immediate restructuring.

Explanation of Incorrect Options:

Option A (exposing misspellings) is not recommended as System APIs should still ensure a professional and coherent interface.

Option C (custom naming) complicates the API structure without adding immediate value in the absence of a clear data model.

Option D (exposing all fields) is unnecessary and can reduce performance and add complexity.

ReferencesRefer to MuleSoft best practices for data modeling in System APIs for additional information on mirroring backend systems​.

Understanding JSON Threat Protection Policies:

JSON Threat Protection policies are used to protect APIs from attacks that exploit JSON payloads, such as oversized payloads, deeply nested objects, and excessive array elements. This helps prevent Denial of Service (DoS) attacks and other malicious payload-related threats.

These policies are typically applied to safeguard APIs that are directly exposed to external clients, where the risk of receiving malicious payloads is highest.

API-led Connectivity Layers:

Experience Layer: This layer is designed to expose APIs to end-users or external API clients, often acting as the interface that interacts with users or applications.

Process Layer: This layer is used for orchestration and aggregation of data from various System APIs, typically operating within a trusted environment and not directly exposed to external clients.

System Layer: This layer provides access to backend systems and databases, often within the organization’s secure environment and not directly accessible to external clients.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A (All layers): While JSON Threat Protection can technically be applied to all layers, it is most commonly applied at the Experience layer, where APIs are exposed to external traffic and are more vulnerable to attacks.

Option B (System layer): The System layer is generally not exposed to external clients directly, so JSON Threat Protection is less critical here.

Option C (Process layer): Similar to the System layer, the Process layer is typically internal and not exposed directly to external clients, so JSON Threat Protection is less commonly applied.

Option D (Correct Answer): The Experience layer is the correct answer because it is the layer that directly interacts with external clients, making it the primary target for malicious payloads. Applying JSON Threat Protection here effectively protects the application network from external threats.

Conclusion:

Option D is the correct answer, as the Experience layer is the most common layer for applying JSON Threat Protection policies to protect against external attacks.

For further reference, consult MuleSoft's documentation on API security policies and best practices for securing APIs at the Experience layer.

Explanation

Correct Answer: Guarding against Denial of Service attacks

*****************************************

>> Backend system overloading can be handled by enforcing "Spike Control Policy"

>> Logging HTTP requests and responses can be done by enforcing "Message Logging Policy"

>> Credentials can be tamper-proofed using "Security" and "Compliance" Policies

However, unfortunately, there is no proper way currently on Anypoint Platform to guard against DOS attacks.

Understanding Coarse-Grained vs. Fine-Grained API Design:

A coarse-grained design consolidates multiple operations within a single API, leading to fewer APIs but with more complex implementations. Conversely, a fine-grained design breaks down functionalities into smaller, more specific APIs, resulting in simpler implementations but a larger number of APIs.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A (Correct Answer): With a coarse-grained design, each API handles more functionalities, increasing the complexity of each API implementation as it needs to manage more use cases and logic.

Option B: A coarse-grained design typically reduces the number of APIs, so fewer discoverable assets are available.

Option C: Fewer APIs generally mean fewer connections between them in the application network.

Option D: Network infrastructure usage may actually decrease with fewer APIs, as there are fewer calls between APIs.

Conclusion:

Option A is the correct answer, as the complexity of each API implementation increases in a coarse-grained design due to the consolidation of multiple functionalities into single APIs.

Refer to MuleSoft’s documentation on API design principles and best practices for coarse-grained vs. fine-grained API implementation.

Explanation

Correct Answer: Ask the Marketing Department to interact with a mocking implementation of the API using the automatically generated API Console.

*****************************************

As per MuleSoft's IT Operating Model:

>> API consumers need NOT wait until the full API implementation is ready.

>> NO technical test-suites needs to be shared with end users to interact with APIs.

>> Anypoint Platform offers a mocking capability on all the published API specifications to Anypoint Exchange which also will be rich in documentation covering all details of API functionalities and working nature.

>> No needs of arranging days of workshops with end users for feedback.

API consumers can use Anypoint Exchange features on the platform and interact with the API using its mocking feature. The feedback can be shared quickly on the same to incorporate any changes.

Explanation

Correct Answer: Create reusable assets, Make them discoverable so that LOB teams can self-serve and browse the APIs, Get active feedback and usage metrics.

*****************************************

Diagram, arrow Description automatically generated

For an organization starting with API-led connectivity to integrate a siloed back-end system with a new CRM, the following approach aligns with best practices and MuleSoft’s Center for Enablement (C4E) guidance:

API-led Connectivity: This model organizes APIs into distinct layers (System, Process, and Experience) to improve reusability, modularity, and manageability.

System APIs are used to expose and unlock data from core systems (such as back-end applications or databases).

Process APIs orchestrate data across multiple systems and transform it as needed.

Experience APIs format the data specifically for consumption by applications or devices, such as the CRM in this case.

Step to Support Application Network:

Create a System API for the back-end system. This API should expose the necessary data to support integration with the CRM.

By creating a System API with a RESTful interface, data can be accessed in a standardized way, making it easier to integrate with other systems and supporting future scalability.

Why Option D is Correct:

Creating a System API aligns with the principle of API-led connectivity, ensuring that data is exposed in a reusable manner. This API can then be orchestrated by Process APIs as needed to meet CRM requirements and can easily be extended to other applications.

Explanation of Incorrect Options:

Option A (creating a business process model) does not directly enable connectivity or expose back-end data through APIs.

Option B is unnecessary at this stage; assessing CRM capabilities like OAuth 2.0 support is not directly related to creating the application network via System APIs.

Option C contradicts API-led best practices by suggesting a point-to-point integration, which API-led connectivity seeks to avoid due to its lack of flexibility and scalability.

ReferencesRefer to MuleSoft’s API-led Connectivity resources for a detailed framework on building scalable integration layers using System, Process, and Experience APIs​​.

In this scenario, the best approach to satisfy the API-led connectivity principles and support future scalability is:

Experience APIs:

Create separate Experience APIs for the web application and the mobile application. This allows each application to have an optimized interface, supporting different needs and potential differences in request/response structures or security configurations.

Process API:

A single Process API can be used to orchestrate the workflow, including retrieving the email template from a database and preparing the email content. By centralizing this logic in the Process layer, we can ensure it is reusable and easily adaptable for different notification channels in the future.

System API:

A System API specifically designed for sending emails (using the Anypoint Connector for Email) abstracts the email-sending functionality from the business logic. This approach ensures that the email-sending function is reusable and scalable, and it can easily be extended or modified if other notification channels (like SMS or push notifications) are added later.

Why Option A is Correct:

This structure aligns with API-led connectivity principles by separating concerns across Experience, Process, and System layers. It provides flexibility for future notification channels and isolates each layer’s responsibility, making it easier to maintain and scale.

Explanation of Incorrect Options:

Option B lacks a separate System API for sending emails, which goes against the principle of isolating back-end functionality in System APIs.

Option C similarly lacks a dedicated System API, reducing flexibility and reusability.

Option D suggests creating multiple Process APIs for database retrieval, which adds unnecessary complexity and does not adhere to the single-orchestration principle typically followed in API-led design.

ReferencesFor further guidance on API-led connectivity and the responsibilities of each API layer, refer to MuleSoft’s documentation on API-led architecture and design best practices​​.

Explanation

Correct Answer: From the Mule runtime irrespective of the deployment model

*****************************************

>> Monitoring and Alerting metrics are always originated from Mule Runtimes irrespective of the deployment model.

>> It may seems that some metrics (Runtime Manager) are originated from Mule Runtime and some are (API Invocations/ API Analytics) from API Manager. However, this is realistically NOT TRUE. The reason is, API manager is just a management tool for API instances but all policies upon applying on APIs eventually gets executed on Mule Runtimes only (Either Embedded or API Proxy).

>> Similarly all API Implementations also run on Mule Runtimes.

So, most of the day required for monitoring and alerts are originated fron Mule Runtimes only irrespective of whether the deployment model is MuleSoft-hosted or Customer-hosted or Hybrid.

Explanation

Correct Answer: By default, the Anypoint CLI and Mule Maven plugin are NOT included in the Mule runtime, so are NOT available to be used by deployed Mule applications

*****************************************

>> We CANNOT apply API policies to the Anypoint Platform APIs like we can do on our custom written API instances. So, option suggesting this is FALSE.

>> Anypoint Platform APIs can be used for automating interactions with both CloudHub and customer-hosted Mule runtimes. Not JUST the CloudHub. So, option opposing this is FALSE.

>> Mule Maven plugin is NOT mandatory for deployment to customer-hosted Mule runtimes. It just helps your CI/CD to have smoother automation. But not a compulsory requirement to deploy. So, option opposing this is FALSE.

>> We DO NOT have any such special roles and permissions on the platform to separately control access for some users to have Anypoint CLI and others to have Anypoint Platform APIs. With proper general roles/permissions (API Owner, Cloudhub Admin etc..), one can use any of the options (Anypoint CLI or Platform APIs). So, option suggesting this is FALSE.

Only TRUE statement given in the choices is that - Anypoint CLI and Mule Maven plugin are NOT included in the Mule runtime, so are NOT available to be used by deployed Mule applications.

Maven is part of Studio or you can use other Maven installation for development.

CLI is convenience only. It is one of many ways how to install app to the runtime.

These are definitely NOT part of anything except your process of deployment or automation.

Explanation

Correct Answer: Spike control

*****************************************

>> First things first, HTTP Caching policy is for purposes different than avoiding the backend system from overloading. So this is OUT.

>> Rate Limiting and Throttling/ Spike Control policies are designed to limit API access, but have different intentions.

>> Rate limiting protects an API by applying a hard limit on its access.

>> Throttling/ Spike Control shapes API access by smoothing spikes in traffic.

That is why, Spike Control is the right option.