CrowdStrike CCCS-203b Dumps

When using theFalcon Kubernetes Admission Controller, CrowdStrike allows administrators to precisely scope which Kubernetes assets are evaluated againstIndicators of Misconfiguration (IOMs)andImage Assessment policiesby usingboth namespaces and pod or service labels.

Namespaces provide a logical boundary within Kubernetes clusters, often representing environments such as dev, staging, or production. Labels add further granularity by identifying workloads based on application, team ownership, or deployment tier. By combining namespaces and labels, security teams can enforce policies with fine-grained control while minimizing unintended enforcement.

Using only namespaces or only labels limits flexibility and may lead to over- or under-enforcement. CrowdStrike documentation supports the combined approach as a best practice for scalable and precise policy enforcement in Kubernetes environments.

Therefore, the correct answer isNamespaces and Pod or Service labels.

Falcon Cloud Security categorizes IOAs usingMITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques, enriched withcloud-provider contextto accurately represent cloud-native attack behavior.

To identifyDefense Evasion via Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Toolsactivity specifically withinAzure, analysts must filter IOAs usingMITRE Tactic and Techniquewhile also scoping the environment to thecloud provider. This ensures visibility into attacker behaviors such as disabling logging, modifying security services, or impairing monitoring controls at the cloud-provider level.

Filtering by attack type alone lacks the structured MITRE mapping required for accurate investigative workflows. Service-level filters are insufficient because impairment of defenses in cloud environments often impacts provider-managed services rather than individual workloads.

Therefore,MITRE Tactic and Technique – Cloud provideris the correct and most precise filter to identify Azure-specific defense evasion IOAs.

The secure and recommended way to test whether firewall restrictions are causing CSPM operation failures is to verify that the required CrowdStrike IP addresses are allowlisted. Falcon Cloud Security relies on outbound API communication between CrowdStrike and the cloud provider. If firewall rules block this traffic, asset inventory collection and IOM detection can fail even though registration appears successful.

CrowdStrike publishes a list of IP addresses and endpoints that must be permitted for proper operation. Validating firewall allowlists against this documentation is a low-risk, best-practice troubleshooting step that preserves security controls while testing connectivity assumptions.

Temporarily opening firewalls to all inbound traffic is insecure and strongly discouraged. Dismissing firewall-related causes without validation can delay resolution. Therefore, the correct and secure approach is to check that the CrowdStrike IP addresses are allowlisted.

In CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Cloud Groups can be applied to container images using three specific image attributes: Image registry, Image repository, and Image tag. These attributes uniquely identify container images and allow precise scoping of policies and visibility.

Image registry identifies where the image is hosted (for example, Amazon ECR or Docker Hub).

Image repository defines the namespace or project within that registry.

Image tag specifies the version or variant of the image.

Together, these attributes provide a consistent and cloud-native method to group images across environments. Other attributes such as image version or type are not used as Cloud Group selectors in Falcon. Therefore, the correct answer is Image registry, Image repository, and Image tag.

During thecloud inventory phase of image assessmentinCrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, the platform performs a deep, non-runtime analysis of container images to establish a complete software and binary inventory. This phase is designed to build visibility and context before vulnerability analysis or enforcement occurs.

Falcon expandsall container image layersto inspect their contents individually. This layered expansion is critical because vulnerabilities and malicious artifacts can exist in any layer, including inherited base images. During this process, Falcon collectscryptographic hashes for all binary objectsfound within the image. These hashes allow Falcon to uniquely identify binaries, correlate them with known threats, and support future detection and investigation workflows.

In addition to binary hashing, Falcon enumerates andlists operating system (OS) packagesinstalled in the image. This includes system libraries and dependencies provided by the base operating system, which are essential for accurate vulnerability mapping and exposure analysis later in the assessment lifecycle.

Importantly,vulnerability identification does not occur during the inventory phase. That activity is handled in subsequent analysis stages. The inventory phase focuses exclusively onexpansion, identification, and catalogingof image contents to ensure complete visibility and accuracy.

Therefore, the correct answer isOption C, as it precisely reflects the documented activities performed during the cloud inventory phase of image assessment in CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security.

To confirm whether malware exists within a container image, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security directs investigators to reviewImage detection findings. These findings are generated during container image assessments, where Falcon performs deep inspection of image layers, binaries, and embedded artifacts.

Image detection findings include indicators of known malware, suspicious executables, malicious scripts, and other threats identified through CrowdStrike’s threat intelligence and detection engines. Because container images are often reused across environments, identifying malware at the image level is critical to preventing widespread propagation.

Other options do not directly confirm malware within an image.Drift indicatorsrelate to changes in a running container compared to its original image, not malware embedded in the image itself.Container alertsare typically runtime detections triggered by behavior during execution.Container misconfigurationsfocus on insecure settings rather than malicious code.

By reviewing image detection findings, security teams can identify infected images early, remediate by rebuilding clean images, and prevent deployment through policy enforcement mechanisms such as the Kubernetes Admission Controller. Therefore, the correct investigation path for suspected malware in a container image isImage detection findings.

WhenAWS Systems Manager (SSM)is unavailable,Ansibleis the supported and recommended IT automation tool for generating an inventory of unmanaged workloads and deploying the Falcon sensor using1-click sensor deployment workflows.

CrowdStrike integrates with Ansible to enable discovery, inventory generation, and automated sensor installation across cloud and on-prem environments. Ansible’s agentless architecture makes it especially suitable when native cloud management services are unavailable or restricted.

Other tools listed—Jet, Rudder, and Puppet—are not natively integrated with Falcon’s 1-click deployment workflows for unmanaged workload discovery in cloud environments.

Therefore,Ansibleis the correct answer.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security supportsscheduled reportingas the preferred mechanism for automatically distributing security findings to stakeholders who may not have direct access to the Falcon console. When container vulnerabilities need to be reviewed on aweekly basis, the correct and most operationally efficient approach is tocreate a scheduled report covering the last 7 days.

Scheduled reports can be configured to run automatically and delivered via email to designated recipients, including users without Falcon console access. This makes them ideal for cross-functional teams, auditors, or management who require regular visibility into container risk without interactive access.

UsingAdvanced Event Searchrequires console access and manual execution, which does not meet the requirement for automatic distribution. Dashboards also require console access and cannot be securely shared externally. A 24-hour report would not align with the stated weekly review cadence and could result in incomplete visibility.

CrowdStrike documentation and best practices recommend scheduled reports for recurring compliance, vulnerability, and risk reporting use cases. Therefore, the correct solution is tocreate a scheduled report to list vulnerable container data from the last 7 days.

In Falcon Cloud Security, theRegistry assessment statuswidget provides visibility into the current state of container image assessments for connected registries. This widget displaysaggregate totals of assessed and unassessed images, allowing analysts to quickly determine whether images are being successfully scanned.

When investigating unassessed images, this widget is the primary starting point because it reflects real-time assessment coverage across all configured registry connections. It helps identify gaps caused by authentication failures, network restrictions, throttling, or configuration limits such as assessment age thresholds.

Other widgets provide narrower views.Image processingfocuses on images currently being scanned,Assessed imagesonly shows completed scans without highlighting gaps, andConnection statusreflects connectivity health but not assessment coverage.

CrowdStrike documentation and UI design emphasize the Registry assessment status widget as the authoritative summary for image assessment completeness. Therefore, the correct answer isRegistry assessment status.

To identify issues related to anoverprivileged cloud identity, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security directs users toCloud Indicators of Misconfiguration (CIM). These indicators focus specifically on risky configurations, including excessive permissions, overly broad IAM roles, and violations of least-privilege principles.

By filtering Cloud Indicators of Misconfiguration for the specific identity, security teams can quickly identify misaligned permissions such as wildcard actions, unused privileges, or access that exceeds the role’s intended function. This view is purpose-built for identifying configuration risk—not active attacks or behavioral anomalies.

Cloud Indicators of Attack (CIA)are used to detect suspicious or malicious activity, not static permission risk.Investigate User Searchfocuses on observed behavior rather than permission design.Falcon Users Roles and Permissionsapplies to Falcon console access, not cloud-provider IAM identities.

Therefore, the correct and CrowdStrike-aligned approach is to reviewCloud Indicators of Misconfigurationfor the identity in question.

Visibility intoAWS IAM controls, includingrestricted use of AWS CloudShell (CIS IAM 1.20), is provided throughCrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security posture managementusingIndicators of Misconfiguration (IOMs). These checks continuously evaluate cloud resources againstindustry-standard benchmarks, including theCIS Foundations Benchmarks for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud.

CrowdStrike maintainsprebuilt, managed IOM policiesthat are automatically updated to reflect the latest CIS guidance. Leveraging existing IOM policies ensures immediate coverage without the operational risk or overhead of creating and maintaining custom rules. These policies assess IAM configurations, permissions usage, service access controls, and policy enforcement related to CloudShell usage.

IOAs are designed for runtime behavioral detections and are not suitable for posture or configuration validation. Creating custom IOMs is unnecessary for CIS-aligned controls because CrowdStrike already provides validated, benchmark-mapped policies maintained by CrowdStrike security research.

Therefore,leveraging existing IOM policiesis the correct and recommended approach to maintaincontinuous, benchmark-aligned visibilityacross multi-cloud environments.

In CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, exclusions for cloud scans are designed to be precise and scalable so that organizations can safely reduce noise without weakening overall security coverage. According to CrowdStrike best practices,tagsare the recommended and supported criterion for creating cloud scan exclusions.

Tags are metadata labels applied to cloud resources (such as AWS accounts, instances, or services) and are commonly used for ownership, environment classification (for example, dev, test, or prod), or application grouping. By using tags as exclusion criteria, security teams can dynamically control which resources are excluded from scans without relying on static identifiers. This is especially important in cloud environments where resources are frequently created, modified, or terminated.

Exclusions based onaccounts,regions, orservicesare broader in scope and can unintentionally exclude large portions of the environment, increasing the risk of blind spots. Tag-based exclusions allow CrowdStrike Falcon to maintain least-privilege security principles by excluding only explicitly labeled resources.

Because Falcon continuously evaluates cloud resources, tag-based exclusions automatically apply to newly created assets that inherit the same tag, ensuring consistent policy enforcement. For these reasons, CrowdStrike documentation and operational guidance identifyTagas the correct and most effective criterion for creating cloud scan exclusions.

Unassessed images pose a security risk because theyexist in connected image registries but have not been evaluated for vulnerabilities. Even if they are not currently running, these images can be deployed at any time, potentially introducing critical vulnerabilities, secrets, or malware into production environments.

Falcon Cloud Security emphasizes proactive image assessment to ensure risks are identifiedbefore deployment. Unassessed images represent blind spots where vulnerabilities may go unnoticed until runtime, increasing exposure and response time.

Options describing actively running containers are incorrect because running workloads are typically assessed through runtime sensors. The primary concern with unassessed images is theirunknown risk posture prior to use.

Therefore, the correct answer isThey are in one of your connected image registries but have not been checked for vulnerabilities.

When registering an AWS account with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, enabling real-time visibility and detection is recommended to improve overall security posture. This ensures continuous monitoring of cloud activity, identities, and resources rather than relying solely on periodic posture assessments.

Real-time detection allows Falcon to identify risky behavior, misconfigurations, and attack techniques as they occur, reducing dwell time and improving response effectiveness. The other options are not registration-specific security enhancements within Falcon.

Therefore, the correct answer is Real-time visibility and detection.

When registering an individual AWS account in CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security using the Falcon UI, therecommended and supported method is AWS CloudFormation. CrowdStrike provides a prebuilt CloudFormation template that automates the creation of required AWS resources, including IAM roles, permissions, and trust relationships needed for secure, read-only API access.

Using CloudFormation ensures the deployment isconsistent, auditable, and aligned with AWS best practices. It minimizes human error by automatically configuring the correct permissions required for Falcon to collect configuration, identity, and resource metadata from AWS. This method also simplifies lifecycle management—resources can be updated or removed cleanly by managing the CloudFormation stack.

Other options are not recommended for this use case.AWS Configis a native AWS compliance service but does not handle Falcon onboarding.Terraform scriptsmay be used in advanced or large-scale automation scenarios, but they are not the default or recommended approach for single-account registration in the Falcon UI.Bash scriptslack governance, validation, and repeatability.

Therefore, when registering a single AWS account through the Falcon console,AWS CloudFormationis the correct and CrowdStrike-recommended method.

To reduce operational overhead and help security teams remediate cloud misconfigurations efficiently, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security recommends enablingCloud posture remediation. This CSPM capability is designed to streamline and automate remediation workflows for cloud control plane misconfigurations identified through Indicators of Misconfiguration (IOMs).

Cloud posture remediation provides guided, cloud-native remediation instructions and, in supported scenarios, automated fixes that align with provider best practices (such as AWS IAM, logging, and networking controls). This is particularly valuable when internal teams lack deep cloud expertise or when remediation is outsourced to third parties, as it reduces back-and-forth communication and manual investigation.

Other options do not directly remediate issues.Scheduled reportsandJSON exportsare reporting mechanisms only. TheSIEM Connectorforwards telemetry but does not resolve misconfigurations. Cloud posture remediation directly addresses the root problem by accelerating corrective actions and reducing mean time to remediation (MTTR).

Therefore, the correct answer isCloud posture remediation.

In CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Cloud Groups are used to logically group container images so that policies, assessments, and controls can be applied consistently across workloads. When editing or defining a Cloud Group for container images, Falcon allows administrators to select specificimage propertiesto precisely target the desired scope.

The three supported image properties areRegistry, Repository, and Tag.

Registryidentifies where the container image is hosted, such as Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, or Docker Hub.

Repositorydefines the image namespace or project within the registry.

Tagspecifies the image version or variant (for example, latest, v1.2.3, or prod).

Using these three properties together enables highly granular targeting. For example, security teams can apply stricter policies only to production-tagged images from a specific registry and repository, while allowing more flexibility for development images.

Options that includeNameare incorrect because CrowdStrike does not use a standalone “image name” field when defining Cloud Group image criteria. Instead, image identity is derived from the combination of registry, repository, and tag.

Therefore, the correct and fully supported selection isRegistry, Repository, and Tag, which aligns with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security configuration and documentation.